Probabilistic risk assessment of radiotherapy application

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Radioprotection Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1051/radiopro/2021037
Ç. Özbay, T. Özbay, A. Güler Yiğitoğlu, M. Bayburt
{"title":"Probabilistic risk assessment of radiotherapy application","authors":"Ç. Özbay, T. Özbay, A. Güler Yiğitoğlu, M. Bayburt","doi":"10.1051/radiopro/2021037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The recent rapid development and increasing complexity of radiotherapy devices and applications has increased the importance of correct and safe treatment. Risk management is very important in radiotherapy (RT), because incorrect treatment can have serious consequences in terms of mortality or morbidity. However, there are currently few studies on risk analysis in RT. This quantitative and qualitative study of the radiotherapy system (all radiotherapy process) uses the fault tree method, one of the probabilistic risk assessment methods in radiotherapy applications, which is used to devise accident preventive actions. First of all, RT applications were divided into simulation, treatment planning and treatment delivery. For each, work flow charts were determined, and fault trees were created in SAPHIRE (Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations) software. Fault probabilities were determined using the expert judgment method. This analysis allowed the identification of the weak points of the system, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The analyzes also revealed that there was a 0.5% occurrence probability of a top event, determined as an incorrect dose or dose distribution in RT. It was determined that the greatest contribution to this probability value was matching error with image guidance, 7.88%. Fault tree analysis (FTA) was found to facilitate a detailed examination of the radiotherapy system. After the risk analysis, the appropriate quality control method for weak points should be determined and implemented for safety management in radiotherapy.","PeriodicalId":21009,"journal":{"name":"Radioprotection","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioprotection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/radiopro/2021037","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The recent rapid development and increasing complexity of radiotherapy devices and applications has increased the importance of correct and safe treatment. Risk management is very important in radiotherapy (RT), because incorrect treatment can have serious consequences in terms of mortality or morbidity. However, there are currently few studies on risk analysis in RT. This quantitative and qualitative study of the radiotherapy system (all radiotherapy process) uses the fault tree method, one of the probabilistic risk assessment methods in radiotherapy applications, which is used to devise accident preventive actions. First of all, RT applications were divided into simulation, treatment planning and treatment delivery. For each, work flow charts were determined, and fault trees were created in SAPHIRE (Systems Analysis Programs for Hands-on Integrated Reliability Evaluations) software. Fault probabilities were determined using the expert judgment method. This analysis allowed the identification of the weak points of the system, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The analyzes also revealed that there was a 0.5% occurrence probability of a top event, determined as an incorrect dose or dose distribution in RT. It was determined that the greatest contribution to this probability value was matching error with image guidance, 7.88%. Fault tree analysis (FTA) was found to facilitate a detailed examination of the radiotherapy system. After the risk analysis, the appropriate quality control method for weak points should be determined and implemented for safety management in radiotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射治疗应用的概率风险评估
近年来放疗设备和应用的快速发展和日益复杂,增加了正确和安全治疗的重要性。风险管理在放射治疗(RT)中非常重要,因为不正确的治疗可能在死亡率或发病率方面产生严重后果。然而,目前对放射治疗系统(整个放射治疗过程)的风险分析研究较少。本文对放射治疗系统(整个放射治疗过程)的定量和定性研究采用了放射治疗应用中概率风险评估方法之一的故障树方法,用于制定事故预防措施。首先,RT的应用分为模拟、治疗计划和治疗交付。对于每一个,工作流程图被确定,故障树被创建在sapire(系统分析程序动手集成可靠性评估)软件中。采用专家判断法确定故障概率。这种分析可以从定性和定量两方面确定系统的弱点。分析还发现,顶级事件发生的概率为0.5%,确定为rt中剂量或剂量分布不正确。确定该概率值的最大贡献是与图像引导的匹配误差,为7.88%。发现故障树分析(FTA)有助于对放射治疗系统进行详细检查。在进行风险分析后,针对薄弱环节确定相应的质量控制方法,实施放射治疗安全管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radioprotection
Radioprotection ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
54.50%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radioprotection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes (theoretical and practical aspects): dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments.
期刊最新文献
Use of a drone-based gamma-ray spectrometry system to assess point or extended radioactive sources Comparative Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of Guidelines for Nuclear Accident Recovery Etablissement de niveaux de référence diagnostiques locaux pour les protocoles de tomodensitométrie en radiothérapie du cancer du sein dans un seul centre marocain REQUIREMENT FOR DIAGNOSTIC MEDICAL PHYSICISTS IN VIETNAM Evaluating the Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Radiation Protection in Portable Radiological Examinations Among Nurses in Pediatric Intensive Care Units
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1