Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.

IF 2 4区 管理学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183
Makam S Harsha, Pradeep K Bhatia, Ankur Sharma, Priyanka Sethi
{"title":"Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study.","authors":"Makam S Harsha, Pradeep K Bhatia, Ankur Sharma, Priyanka Sethi","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2-5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5-2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and -3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288, <i>p</i> <0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>CTRI/2019/07/020064.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491-495.</p>","PeriodicalId":46235,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing","volume":"21 1","pages":"491-495"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9067479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business-To-Business Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The quantium consciousness index (qCON), an electroencephalography (EEG)-based modality, has no studies regarding intensive care unit (ICU) sedation, though very few studies describe its use for assessing depth of anesthesia in the operation theater. In this study, we evaluated qCON for assessing sedation compared with Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in patients on a mechanical ventilator in the ICU.

Materials and methods: Eighty-seven mechanically ventilated patients aged between 18 and 60 years were investigated over a 12-hour period. They were given a standardized dosage of sedation comprised of a bolus dose of propofol 0.5 mg/kg and fentanyl 1 µg/kg, and then infusions of propofol 2-5 mg/kg/hour and fentanyl 0.5-2 µg/kg/hour. These drug infusions were adjusted to achieve a RASS score between 0 and -3. Using the qCON monitor, the investigator recorded the qCON values and then assessed the RASS score.

Results: A total of 1,218 readings were obtained. After contrasting each qCON value correspondingly with time to each RASS value, we found their correlation to be statistically significant (ρ = 0.288, p <0.0001). With the help of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, we were able to differentiate appropriate from inappropriate levels of sedation. A qCON value of 80 had a sensitivity of 72.67% and a specificity of 67.42% (AUC 0.738 with SE 0.021).

Conclusion: qCON can be used for assessing sedation levels in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.

Clinical trial registration: CTRI/2019/07/020064.

How to cite this article: Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Comparison of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients: An Observational Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491-495.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机械通气重症患者的量子意识指数与里士满躁动镇静量表的比较:一项观察研究。
背景:量子意识指数(qCON)是一种基于脑电图(EEG)的模式,目前还没有关于重症监护病房(ICU)镇静的研究,但很少有研究描述它可用于评估手术室的麻醉深度。在这项研究中,我们评估了 qCON 与里士满躁动镇静量表(RASS)相比在重症监护室使用机械呼吸机的患者中评估镇静的效果:我们对 87 名年龄在 18 岁至 60 岁之间的机械通气患者进行了为期 12 小时的调查。他们接受了标准化剂量的镇静治疗,包括异丙酚 0.5 毫克/千克和芬太尼 1 微克/千克的栓剂,然后输注异丙酚 2-5 毫克/千克/小时和芬太尼 0.5-2 微克/千克/小时。研究人员使用 qCON 监测器记录 qCON 值,然后评估 RASS 分数:总共获得了 1,218 个读数。将每个 qCON 值与每个 RASS 值的时间进行相应对比后,我们发现它们之间的相关性具有统计学意义(ρ = 0.288,p 结论:qCON 可用于评估机械通气重症患者的镇静水平:CTRI/2019/07/020064.如何引用本文:Harsha MS, Bhatia PK, Sharma A, Sethi P. Mechanically Ventilated Critically Ill Patients of Quantium Consciousness Index and Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale:一项观察性研究。Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(4):491-495.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
35.70%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing® encourages diversity in approaches to business marketing theory development, research methods, and managerial problem solving. An editorial board comprised of outstanding, internationally recognized scholars and practitioners ensures that the journal maintains impeccable standards of relevance and rigorous scholarship. The Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing features: •basic and applied research that reflects current business marketing theory, methodology, and practice •articles from leading researchers covering topics of mutual interest for the business and academic communities
期刊最新文献
Examining Buyers’ Attitudes Toward Climate Change Policy and Their firms’ Corporate Reputation: The Serial Mediation Effect of Suppliers’ Engagement and Commitment Collaborating with Public Research Institutions: Using Strategic Intent and Co-Created Value to Gain Strategic Opportunities in New Product Development The Role of Digital Communication Technologies Through Customer and Market Knowledge in B2B on Sales Performance and Satisfaction Delving into the Architecture of International B2B Relationship Marketing During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Business Convergence to Partnership Effectiveness “Business-to-Business-to-Brain?” Reviewing Neuroscience Research in B2B-Marketing Using TCCM Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1