Guilt Historicism: Walter Benjamin’s “Capitalism as Religion,” Aura, and the Case of Chaucer’s Pardoner

IF 0.1 0 CLASSICS Exemplaria Classica Pub Date : 2022-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10412573.2022.2070357
G. Edmondson
{"title":"Guilt Historicism: Walter Benjamin’s “Capitalism as Religion,” Aura, and the Case of Chaucer’s Pardoner","authors":"G. Edmondson","doi":"10.1080/10412573.2022.2070357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article takes up Walter Benjamin’s allusive 1921 sketch “Capitalism as Religion” in order to think about the place of debt and guilt in our relation, as members (or perhaps apostates) of what Benjamin describes as the “purely cultic religion” of capitalism, to the Middle Ages. My focus here is on two aspects of Benjamin’s sketch. One is its evocation, diametrically opposed to that found in Benjamin’s celebrated essay on the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, of aura as a force of liberating distractedness, rather than politically suspect absorption. The other is the rejoinder “Capitalism as Religion” provides to Benjamin’s sweeping claim, made in another fragmentary sketch, that guilt is “the highest category of world history.” Taking up the disciplinary implications of that claim, the essay reads Chaucer’s Pardoner as a test case for a possible practice of guilt historicism.","PeriodicalId":40762,"journal":{"name":"Exemplaria Classica","volume":"49 1","pages":"103 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exemplaria Classica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10412573.2022.2070357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article takes up Walter Benjamin’s allusive 1921 sketch “Capitalism as Religion” in order to think about the place of debt and guilt in our relation, as members (or perhaps apostates) of what Benjamin describes as the “purely cultic religion” of capitalism, to the Middle Ages. My focus here is on two aspects of Benjamin’s sketch. One is its evocation, diametrically opposed to that found in Benjamin’s celebrated essay on the work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction, of aura as a force of liberating distractedness, rather than politically suspect absorption. The other is the rejoinder “Capitalism as Religion” provides to Benjamin’s sweeping claim, made in another fragmentary sketch, that guilt is “the highest category of world history.” Taking up the disciplinary implications of that claim, the essay reads Chaucer’s Pardoner as a test case for a possible practice of guilt historicism.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
罪责历史主义:瓦尔特·本雅明的“作为宗教的资本主义”、光环和乔叟的赦免案
本文以沃尔特·本雅明(Walter Benjamin)在1921年的隐晦素描《作为宗教的资本主义》(Capitalism as Religion)为例,思考作为本雅明所描述的资本主义“纯粹邪教”的成员(或者可能是叛教者),在我们与中世纪的关系中,债务和罪恶感所处的位置。我在这里的重点是本雅明素描的两个方面。其一是它的唤起,与本雅明关于机械复制时代的艺术作品的著名文章截然相反,他认为光环是一种解放分心的力量,而不是政治上可疑的专注。另一个是《作为宗教的资本主义》对本雅明在另一个片段中提出的全面主张的反驳,即内疚是“世界历史的最高范畴”。这篇文章探讨了这一主张的学科含义,将乔叟的《赦免者》视为一种可能的内疚历史主义实践的测试案例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tra Iporchemi e Parteni (Pindaro, Hyporch. F9 Recchia) Il Paratesto in Catullo: alcune riflessioni su un saggio recente Pelasgus Sacca. Una nuova testimonianza su Sacada di Argo e alcune osservazioni sulla fortuna umanistica dei Deipnosofisti di Ateneo Cynthia e lo statuto dinamico dell’elegia, tra dream narrative, arte figurativa e modelli epici Olympica Pindarica (I)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1