Qualidade física de um latossolo vermelho acriférrico sob diferentes sistemas de uso e manejo

IF 2 4区 农林科学 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo Pub Date : 2009-06-01 DOI:10.1590/S0100-06832009000300020
R. G. Aratani, O. S. Freddi, J. F. Centurion, I. Andrioli
{"title":"Qualidade física de um latossolo vermelho acriférrico sob diferentes sistemas de uso e manejo","authors":"R. G. Aratani, O. S. Freddi, J. F. Centurion, I. Andrioli","doi":"10.1590/S0100-06832009000300020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Agricultural management systems can cause degradation of the soil physical quality, with consequences to the environment and crop yields. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the physical quality of an anionic Acrustox in Guaira, Sao Paulo state, under the following treatments: no-tillage with irrigation, no-tillage without irrigation, croppasture rotation, conventional tillage, and native forest. The organic matter content, aggregate stability, soil bulk density, porosity and index S were evaluated. Results showed that human intervention reduced the soil quality and that no-tillage led to no increase in organic matter contents, but it did increase aggregation indices as compared with conventional tillage. In the no-tillage system plus irrigation, the aggregate stability increased in all evaluated soil layers and there also was gains in macropore volume in the 0-0.10 m soil layer over time. The use of crop-pasture rotation did not improve the soil physical quality and the index S varied according to the systems, although it was always higher than the value suggested as limit for good soil physical quality.","PeriodicalId":21215,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","volume":"39 1","pages":"677-687"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-06832009000300020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 38

Abstract

Agricultural management systems can cause degradation of the soil physical quality, with consequences to the environment and crop yields. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the physical quality of an anionic Acrustox in Guaira, Sao Paulo state, under the following treatments: no-tillage with irrigation, no-tillage without irrigation, croppasture rotation, conventional tillage, and native forest. The organic matter content, aggregate stability, soil bulk density, porosity and index S were evaluated. Results showed that human intervention reduced the soil quality and that no-tillage led to no increase in organic matter contents, but it did increase aggregation indices as compared with conventional tillage. In the no-tillage system plus irrigation, the aggregate stability increased in all evaluated soil layers and there also was gains in macropore volume in the 0-0.10 m soil layer over time. The use of crop-pasture rotation did not improve the soil physical quality and the index S varied according to the systems, although it was always higher than the value suggested as limit for good soil physical quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同使用和管理系统下氧化土的物理质量
农业管理制度可能导致土壤物理质量退化,对环境和作物产量造成影响。因此,本研究的目的是评价和比较圣保罗州瓜伊拉(Guaira)阴离子Acrustox在以下处理下的物理质量:免耕带灌溉、免耕不灌溉、轮作、常规耕作和原生林。对有机质含量、团聚体稳定性、土壤容重、孔隙度和S指数进行了评价。结果表明:人为干预降低了土壤质量,免耕对土壤有机质含量没有增加作用,但与常规耕作相比,免耕提高了土壤团聚指数;在免耕加灌溉系统中,所有评估土层的团聚体稳定性都有所增加,0-0.10 m土层的大孔体积也随着时间的推移而增加。作物-牧草轮作对土壤物理质量没有改善作用,土壤物理质量指数S在不同系统中存在差异,但总高于土壤物理质量良好的极限值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo
Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
32
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society for Soil Science (SBCS), founded in 1947, and is responsible for the propagation of original and inedited technical-scientific work of interest for Soil Science. Contributions must not have been previously published or submit to other periodicals, with the only exception of articles presented in summarized form at professional meetings. Literature reviews are accepted when solicited by the Editorial Board.
期刊最新文献
Adapting the land agricultural suitability assessment scheme for drylands edaphoclimatic conditions Educational procedures guided by emancipatory principles for education on soils in higher education: A proposal Conservation agriculture practices in a peanut cropping system: Effects on pod yield and soil penetration resistance Biogenic and physicogenic aggregates as indicators of quality in soils with sandy texture in areas of organic agriculture Identifying appropriate reference ecosystems based on soil indicators to evaluate postmining reclamation: A multivariate framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1