Let’s Talk about the Animals – Taking the Outcomes of Animal Models of Human Emotion and Affective Behavior Back to Understanding Animal Minds and Emotions

Augusta Gaspar, Constança Carvalho
{"title":"Let’s Talk about the Animals – Taking the Outcomes of Animal Models of Human Emotion and Affective Behavior Back to Understanding Animal Minds and Emotions","authors":"Augusta Gaspar, Constança Carvalho","doi":"10.1163/25889567-bja10032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The socioemotional lives of animals have been brought to light over the years by studies seeking to address specific topics in animal emotion, cognition and behavior. Breakthrough information has been provided by field work with natural communities, and notable advances have stemmed from non-invasive research with captive animals and from laboratory work entailing varying degrees of invasiveness. But there is a source of information on animals that has not always been integrated in the knowledge on animals’ emotional lives: the outputs of studies where animals served as models of human emotional processes but that were seldom published as literature on animals. This article proposes an integrated view whereby the vast amount of information amassed by the brain and behavioral sciences over the course of the last 30 years on the affective experiences of animals, their triggers, biomarkers and behavioral correlates is fully integrated in an account of animal emotions. Topics where this knowledge can accommodate further integration from studies with animals models of the human mind are the parental care and different types of affective bonds; the experience of empathic reactions, the association between emotions, expressive behavior and affective bonds, and conscience. Fostering further connection between these neuroscience and behavioral studies might contribute to 1) widening the breath of measures used in assessing the well-being of animals, 2) widening criteria used by ethical committees considering studies with animals, and 3) to review some common practices that by those who have key roles in the management of wild or captive animals.","PeriodicalId":73601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied animal ethics research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/25889567-bja10032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The socioemotional lives of animals have been brought to light over the years by studies seeking to address specific topics in animal emotion, cognition and behavior. Breakthrough information has been provided by field work with natural communities, and notable advances have stemmed from non-invasive research with captive animals and from laboratory work entailing varying degrees of invasiveness. But there is a source of information on animals that has not always been integrated in the knowledge on animals’ emotional lives: the outputs of studies where animals served as models of human emotional processes but that were seldom published as literature on animals. This article proposes an integrated view whereby the vast amount of information amassed by the brain and behavioral sciences over the course of the last 30 years on the affective experiences of animals, their triggers, biomarkers and behavioral correlates is fully integrated in an account of animal emotions. Topics where this knowledge can accommodate further integration from studies with animals models of the human mind are the parental care and different types of affective bonds; the experience of empathic reactions, the association between emotions, expressive behavior and affective bonds, and conscience. Fostering further connection between these neuroscience and behavioral studies might contribute to 1) widening the breath of measures used in assessing the well-being of animals, 2) widening criteria used by ethical committees considering studies with animals, and 3) to review some common practices that by those who have key roles in the management of wild or captive animals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让我们谈谈动物——把人类情感和情感行为的动物模型的结果带回理解动物的思想和情感
多年来,通过寻求解决动物情感、认知和行为方面的特定主题的研究,动物的社会情感生活已经被揭示出来。对自然群落的实地工作提供了突破性的信息,对圈养动物的非侵入性研究和涉及不同程度侵入性的实验室工作取得了显著进展。但是,有一个关于动物的信息来源并不总是被整合到关于动物情感生活的知识中:动物作为人类情感过程模型的研究结果,但很少作为关于动物的文献发表。这篇文章提出了一个综合的观点,在过去的30年里,大脑和行为科学在动物的情感体验、触发因素、生物标志物和行为相关方面积累了大量的信息,这些信息被完全整合到动物情感的描述中。这些知识可以从人类思维的动物模型研究中进一步整合的主题是父母照顾和不同类型的情感纽带;共情反应的经验,情感之间的联系,表达行为和情感纽带,以及良心。促进这些神经科学和行为研究之间的进一步联系可能有助于:1)扩大用于评估动物福利的措施的范围;2)扩大伦理委员会考虑动物研究时使用的标准;3)审查那些在野生动物或圈养动物管理中发挥关键作用的人的一些常见做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Phenomenology and Critical Hermeneutics of the “Livestock” Industry and Associated Sanctuaries Neglected Tropical Diseases and Long-Term Captive Animals: Ethical Considerations with Venom Lab Snakes Quality Management and Animal Welfare as Culture of Care for Animal Experiments under Biosafety Level-3, taking COVID-19 as a Practical Example Rejecting an Additive Solution to Regan’s Lifeboat Case Zoonoses in Unconventional Companion Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1