Cognitive tests used in examining effects of physical training in elderly people

{"title":"Cognitive tests used in examining effects of physical training in elderly people","authors":"Sławomir Kujawski, A. Gajos, M. Gajos, Wojciech Stemplowski, Natalia Ciesielska, K. Kędziora–Kornatowska","doi":"10.12775/MBS.2015.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Cognitive tests are a valuable, sensitive and useful tool for examining the effectiveness of physical training. Purpose. To show which studies are sensitive in examining cognitive changes induced by physical training. We explored meta-analysis with healthy participants and patients with MCI. Materials and methods. Analysis of meta-analysis in the EBSCO database using keywords: meta-analysis, cognitive tests, physical training, elderly. Results. 4 meta-analysis have 10 researches in common; however, diverse of inclusion and exclusion criteria led to inability in obtaining reliable results. Discussion and conclusion. Some cognitive tests seems to be more sensitive in examining results of physical training. Diversity of research methodology induces much difficulties in comparing of studies.","PeriodicalId":18339,"journal":{"name":"Medical and Biological Sciences","volume":"39 1","pages":"11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical and Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/MBS.2015.011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Introduction. Cognitive tests are a valuable, sensitive and useful tool for examining the effectiveness of physical training. Purpose. To show which studies are sensitive in examining cognitive changes induced by physical training. We explored meta-analysis with healthy participants and patients with MCI. Materials and methods. Analysis of meta-analysis in the EBSCO database using keywords: meta-analysis, cognitive tests, physical training, elderly. Results. 4 meta-analysis have 10 researches in common; however, diverse of inclusion and exclusion criteria led to inability in obtaining reliable results. Discussion and conclusion. Some cognitive tests seems to be more sensitive in examining results of physical training. Diversity of research methodology induces much difficulties in comparing of studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于检查老年人体育锻炼效果的认知测试
介绍。认知测试是检验体育训练有效性的一种有价值、灵敏和有用的工具。目的。为了表明哪些研究在检测体育锻炼引起的认知变化方面是敏感的。我们对健康参与者和轻度认知障碍患者进行了荟萃分析。材料和方法。meta分析在EBSCO数据库中使用关键词:meta分析,认知测试,体能训练,老年人。结果:4项meta分析共有10项研究;然而,由于纳入和排除标准的多样化,导致无法获得可靠的结果。讨论与结论。一些认知测试在检查体育锻炼的结果时似乎更敏感。研究方法的多样性给比较研究带来了很多困难。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Effects of 5‐month interval walking training on cognitive function in elderly people
IF 4.8 2区 生物学The FASEB JournalPub Date : 2018-04-01 DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2018.32.1_supplement.588.10
Mayuka Furihata, M. Morikawa, Ryoichi Hayashi, Wayumi Tomita, S. Masuki, H. Nose
Integration of Cognitive and Physical Training in a Smart Home Environment for the Elderly People
IF 0 Studies in Health Technology and InformaticsPub Date : 2010-01-01 DOI: 10.3233/978-1-60750-588-4-58
E. Konstantinidis, Antonis Billis, Walter Hlauschek, P. Panek, P. Bamidis
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic hypothermia after a cardiac arrest – Benefits, limitations, controversy The epidemiology of breast cancer in Kujawsko-Pomorskie Voivodship in 2006-2010 Review of research tools for assessment of performance of nursing staff Role of mobility in cognitive development of children with motor deficyt – own observations of wheelchairs users Realization of the principles of rational nutrition by the universities of Bydgoszcz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1