Interdependencies or integration? A qualitative evaluation of a national emergency department improvement programme

IF 0.8 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2022-08-04 DOI:10.1108/jica-04-2022-0026
K. Jones, Jaynie Rance
{"title":"Interdependencies or integration? A qualitative evaluation of a national emergency department improvement programme","authors":"K. Jones, Jaynie Rance","doi":"10.1108/jica-04-2022-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeIn Wales (United Kingdom (UK)), a programme known as the emergency department quality and delivery framework (EDQDF) was launched in 2018 with the purpose of designing a framework of what good looks like for emergency care and then implementing this framework in a measurable and sustainable way.Design/methodology/approachA gatekeeper emailed attendees of the EDQDF launch event (n = 70), providing recipients with an information sheet and inviting them to contact the researcher (KJ) if they agreed to be interviewed. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with all respondents (n = 8) after three invitation rounds sent between August and October 2021. The authors used a thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006).FindingsParticipants agreed with the aims and design of the framework, and the authors identified four themes relating to barriers and to facilitators of implementation. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but findings correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding emergency departments’ (EDs') system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Research limitations/implicationsA quality improvement method for health services known as CAREMORE® is found to be a useful approach for the collaborative design of service improvements. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but the interviews correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding EDs' system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Practical implicationsThis evaluation relies on a relatively small number of participants, but as a qualitative evaluation it does not aim towards broadly generalisable findings but rather contributes to broad field concerned with the production of knowledge on the implementation of health service improvements. The project under evaluation is also on-going, and the findings reflect the period from inception to December 2021, but not beyond that date.Originality/valueThis evaluation builds upon previous work in relation to the application of CAREMORE to design a quality improvement framework in a complex area (see Nelson et al., 2018), but this evaluation considers the implementation process. The findings echo research elsewhere and add to a growing body of research that underlines system interconnectivities that impact upon the emergency department.","PeriodicalId":51837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Integrated Care","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jica-04-2022-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeIn Wales (United Kingdom (UK)), a programme known as the emergency department quality and delivery framework (EDQDF) was launched in 2018 with the purpose of designing a framework of what good looks like for emergency care and then implementing this framework in a measurable and sustainable way.Design/methodology/approachA gatekeeper emailed attendees of the EDQDF launch event (n = 70), providing recipients with an information sheet and inviting them to contact the researcher (KJ) if they agreed to be interviewed. The authors conducted semi-structured interviews with all respondents (n = 8) after three invitation rounds sent between August and October 2021. The authors used a thematic analysis approach (Braun and Clarke, 2006).FindingsParticipants agreed with the aims and design of the framework, and the authors identified four themes relating to barriers and to facilitators of implementation. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but findings correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding emergency departments’ (EDs') system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Research limitations/implicationsA quality improvement method for health services known as CAREMORE® is found to be a useful approach for the collaborative design of service improvements. Participants perceive a softening of geographical boundaries through the project, but the interviews correspond with evidence generated elsewhere regarding EDs' system-wide interdependencies and a need for cross-organisational collaboration.Practical implicationsThis evaluation relies on a relatively small number of participants, but as a qualitative evaluation it does not aim towards broadly generalisable findings but rather contributes to broad field concerned with the production of knowledge on the implementation of health service improvements. The project under evaluation is also on-going, and the findings reflect the period from inception to December 2021, but not beyond that date.Originality/valueThis evaluation builds upon previous work in relation to the application of CAREMORE to design a quality improvement framework in a complex area (see Nelson et al., 2018), but this evaluation considers the implementation process. The findings echo research elsewhere and add to a growing body of research that underlines system interconnectivities that impact upon the emergency department.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相互依赖还是集成?对国家急诊科改进方案进行定性评价
目的:在威尔士(联合王国),2018年启动了一项名为急诊科质量和交付框架(EDQDF)的方案,目的是为急诊护理设计一个良好的框架,然后以可衡量和可持续的方式实施该框架。设计/方法/方法看门人通过电子邮件向EDQDF启动活动的与会者(n = 70)发送信息表,并邀请他们联系研究员(KJ),如果他们同意接受采访。在2021年8月至10月发出三轮邀请后,作者对所有受访者(n = 8)进行了半结构化访谈。作者使用了主题分析方法(Braun and Clarke, 2006)。与会者同意框架的目标和设计,作者确定了与实施障碍和促进因素有关的四个主题。参与者认为,通过该项目,地理界限有所软化,但研究结果与其他地方产生的关于急诊科全系统相互依赖关系和跨组织协作需求的证据相一致。研究的局限性/意义一种被称为CAREMORE®的卫生服务质量改进方法被发现是一种有效的服务改进协同设计方法。参与者通过项目感知到地理界限的弱化,但访谈与其他地方产生的关于EDs系统范围内的相互依赖性和跨组织协作需求的证据相一致。实际影响这一评价依赖于相对较少的参与者,但作为一项定性评价,它的目的不是获得广泛的普遍结论,而是促进与产生关于实施保健服务改进的知识有关的广泛领域。正在评估的项目也在进行中,调查结果反映了从开始到2021年12月的时期,但不超过该日期。原创性/价值此评估建立在先前与应用CAREMORE在复杂领域设计质量改进框架相关的工作基础上(见Nelson等人,2018),但此评估考虑了实施过程。这些发现与其他地方的研究相呼应,并增加了越来越多的研究,这些研究强调系统互联性对急诊科的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Integrated Care
Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Are community health agents the link to integrating care? Lesson from Brazil Full Engagement with the NHS in an integrated age: reflections on past endeavours (the Wanless Report) and current challenges (the anti-vaxxer movement) Tackling health inequalities through integrated care in English police custodies: an inclusion perspective and model of care Integrated child mental health care provision in Pakistan: End-user and provider perspectives Health care model for people living in nursing homes based on integrated care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1