Understanding the Link between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS Stigmas.

Botanical Gazette Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-03-19 DOI:10.1177/19367244231159609
Newman Chun Wai Wong, Yok-Fong Paat
{"title":"Understanding the Link between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS Stigmas.","authors":"Newman Chun Wai Wong, Yok-Fong Paat","doi":"10.1177/19367244231159609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the HIV/AIDS epidemic has informed the responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a lack of understanding of the empirical links between stigmas associated with COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS. Surveying 247 adults in the United States online, this study aims to examine the relationships between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS stigmas in order to understand how they are similar and different from each other, taking into consideration the context relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic. Four scales of stigmas conveying different attitudes (i.e., rejection, despise, accusation, and caution) were used to examine the relationships between the stigmas of these two infectious diseases. Findings based on the mean comparisons from paired <i>t</i> tests showed the mean difference in scores between respondents who supported the exclusion of COVID-19-infected individuals versus HIV-infected individuals was statistically significant. In addition, the mean difference in scores between respondents who were wary of their need to protect their rights around COVID-19-infected persons versus HIV-infected persons was statistically significant. Controlling for the respondents' sociodemographics and factors that were relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple regression analyses showed that all four types of COVID-19 stigmas were positively associated with their corresponding types of HIV/AIDS stigmas. The preliminary findings between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS stigmas suggested that HIV/AIDS stigma mitigation strategies may present a fruitful approach to inform stigma mitigation of COVID-19.</p>","PeriodicalId":9213,"journal":{"name":"Botanical Gazette","volume":"78 1","pages":"272-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10028685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Botanical Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19367244231159609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While the HIV/AIDS epidemic has informed the responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a lack of understanding of the empirical links between stigmas associated with COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS. Surveying 247 adults in the United States online, this study aims to examine the relationships between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS stigmas in order to understand how they are similar and different from each other, taking into consideration the context relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic. Four scales of stigmas conveying different attitudes (i.e., rejection, despise, accusation, and caution) were used to examine the relationships between the stigmas of these two infectious diseases. Findings based on the mean comparisons from paired t tests showed the mean difference in scores between respondents who supported the exclusion of COVID-19-infected individuals versus HIV-infected individuals was statistically significant. In addition, the mean difference in scores between respondents who were wary of their need to protect their rights around COVID-19-infected persons versus HIV-infected persons was statistically significant. Controlling for the respondents' sociodemographics and factors that were relevant to the COVID-19 pandemic, multiple regression analyses showed that all four types of COVID-19 stigmas were positively associated with their corresponding types of HIV/AIDS stigmas. The preliminary findings between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS stigmas suggested that HIV/AIDS stigma mitigation strategies may present a fruitful approach to inform stigma mitigation of COVID-19.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解 COVID-19 与艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名之间的联系。
虽然艾滋病毒/艾滋病的流行为应对 COVID-19 大流行提供了信息,但人们对 COVID-19 和艾滋病毒/艾滋病相关污名之间的经验联系缺乏了解。本研究对美国 247 名成年人进行了在线调查,旨在研究 COVID-19 和艾滋病毒/艾滋病污名之间的关系,以了解它们之间的异同,同时考虑到 COVID-19 大流行的相关背景。研究使用了四种表达不同态度的污名量表(即拒绝、鄙视、指责和谨慎)来考察这两种传染病的污名之间的关系。基于配对 t 检验的均值比较结果显示,支持排除 COVID-19 感染者的受访者与支持排除 HIV 感染者的受访者之间的得分均值差异具有统计学意义。此外,对保护 COVID-19 感染者的权利持谨慎态度的受访者与 HIV 感染者之间的平均得分差异也具有统计学意义。在控制了受访者的社会人口学特征和与 COVID-19 大流行相关的因素后,多元回归分析表明,所有四种 COVID-19 耻辱类型都与相应的艾滋病毒/艾滋病 耻辱类型呈正相关。COVID-19 与艾滋病毒/艾滋病诋毁之间的初步研究结果表明,艾滋病毒/艾滋病诋毁减缓战略可能是一种富有成效的方法,可为减缓 COVID-19 的诋毁提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FoxP3 recognizes microsatellites and bridges DNA through multimerization. Understanding the Link between COVID-19 and HIV/AIDS Stigmas. National epidemiological analysis of the association of COVID-19 vaccination and incidence of COVID-19 cases in Canada, January to August 2021. Utility of a fulcrum for positioning support during flexion-extension radiographs for assessment of lumbar instability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eucalyptus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1