A Revolutionary Moment Founded on Forgetting: How Narratives of the UK’s Place in Europe and the World made Brexit Possible

Andrew Glencross
{"title":"A Revolutionary Moment Founded on Forgetting: How Narratives of the UK’s Place in Europe and the World made Brexit Possible","authors":"Andrew Glencross","doi":"10.5771/0947-9511-2023-1-35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines Brexit from the perspective of the role played by multiple historical narratives about the UK and its place in Europe, as well as the wider world. Existing accounts associate the 2016 referendum result with the rise of popu⁠lism and the spread of particular anti-EU narratives grounded in Englishness, the Anglosphere and, more problematically, nostalgia about former national glories. The analysis shows that these different historical narratives served to delegitimise European integration as inimical to UK democracy and sovereignty. Equally importantly, narratives of delegitimation in turn depended on a highly selective reading of British history and convenient acts of forgetting or misremembering the role of economic or political borders. It was precisely this combination of selective historical memory and a narrative of EU oppression that created a revolutionary moment. Brexit was thus founded on multiple acts of forgetting.","PeriodicalId":53497,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9511-2023-1-35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines Brexit from the perspective of the role played by multiple historical narratives about the UK and its place in Europe, as well as the wider world. Existing accounts associate the 2016 referendum result with the rise of popu⁠lism and the spread of particular anti-EU narratives grounded in Englishness, the Anglosphere and, more problematically, nostalgia about former national glories. The analysis shows that these different historical narratives served to delegitimise European integration as inimical to UK democracy and sovereignty. Equally importantly, narratives of delegitimation in turn depended on a highly selective reading of British history and convenient acts of forgetting or misremembering the role of economic or political borders. It was precisely this combination of selective historical memory and a narrative of EU oppression that created a revolutionary moment. Brexit was thus founded on multiple acts of forgetting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个建立在遗忘之上的革命性时刻:关于英国在欧洲和世界地位的叙述如何使英国脱欧成为可能
本文从英国及其在欧洲以及更广阔的世界中的地位的多种历史叙述所扮演的角色的角度来审视英国脱欧。现有的记录将2016年的公投结果与民粹主义的兴起,以及基于英国特色、盎格鲁文化圈(Anglosphere)以及(更成问题的)对昔日民族荣耀的怀旧情绪的特定反欧盟叙事的传播联系在一起。分析表明,这些不同的历史叙述有助于使欧洲一体化失去合法性,因为它不利于英国的民主和主权。同样重要的是,关于非合法性的叙述反过来依赖于对英国历史的高度选择性阅读,以及对经济或政治边界作用的遗忘或错误记忆。正是这种选择性历史记忆和欧盟压迫叙事的结合,创造了一个革命性的时刻。因此,英国脱欧建立在多重遗忘行为的基础上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of European Integration History
Journal of European Integration History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Divided by Memory: Divergent Memory Cultures and the Debate about Democracy in the EU Colonial Memories and the French Partisan Right: Preserving National Identity Through or Against Diversity (2002-2022) Constructing a Collective Memory in the Franco-German-Swiss Upper Rhine Region: European, Trans(national) or Regional? The Complexity of Memory in Global Relations and European Integration: A Theoretical Perspective In memoriam Claudia Hiepel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1