Are Arms Trade Treaty Meetings Being Used to Their Full Potential?

IF 0.8 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Responsibility to Protect Pub Date : 2020-05-08 DOI:10.1163/1875984x-01202003
A. Pytlak
{"title":"Are Arms Trade Treaty Meetings Being Used to Their Full Potential?","authors":"A. Pytlak","doi":"10.1163/1875984x-01202003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When adopted in 2013 the international Arms Trade Treaty (att) was widely heralded for its life-saving potential and for bringing human rights and humanitarian concerns squarely into international arms transfers decision-making processes. This article takes a critical look at the att meeting cycle, which comprises an annual conference of states parties (csp), as well as preparatory sessions and meetings of the Treaty’s working groups. The article is guided by the question, are att meetings being used to their full potential to meet the Treaty’s objectives and prevent atrocities? It studies two aspects of the att meeting cycles—working groups and annual csp thematic areas of focus — to demonstrate the nature of the substantive outcomes that are emerging from conferences. The article identifies that the inability of states parties to use the meetings to address matters of compliance with the att’s prohibition and risk assessment requirements constitutes a major shortcoming, and offers suggestions and alternatives for states parties and other stakeholders.","PeriodicalId":38207,"journal":{"name":"Global Responsibility to Protect","volume":"9 1","pages":"156-177"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Responsibility to Protect","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/1875984x-01202003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When adopted in 2013 the international Arms Trade Treaty (att) was widely heralded for its life-saving potential and for bringing human rights and humanitarian concerns squarely into international arms transfers decision-making processes. This article takes a critical look at the att meeting cycle, which comprises an annual conference of states parties (csp), as well as preparatory sessions and meetings of the Treaty’s working groups. The article is guided by the question, are att meetings being used to their full potential to meet the Treaty’s objectives and prevent atrocities? It studies two aspects of the att meeting cycles—working groups and annual csp thematic areas of focus — to demonstrate the nature of the substantive outcomes that are emerging from conferences. The article identifies that the inability of states parties to use the meetings to address matters of compliance with the att’s prohibition and risk assessment requirements constitutes a major shortcoming, and offers suggestions and alternatives for states parties and other stakeholders.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
武器贸易条约会议正在充分发挥其潜力吗?
2013年通过的《武器贸易条约》因其拯救生命的潜力以及将人权和人道主义关切直接纳入国际武器转让决策过程而受到广泛赞誉。本文对《条约》的会议周期进行了批判性的审视,该周期包括年度缔约国会议(csp)以及筹备会议和《条约》工作组会议。该条的指导问题是,是否正在充分利用att会议的潜力来实现《条约》的目标和防止暴行?它研究了att会议周期的两个方面- -工作组和年度csp专题重点领域- -以说明会议所产生的实质性成果的性质。该条指出,缔约国无法利用会议解决遵守《武器贸易条约》禁止和风险评估要求的问题,这是一个重大缺陷,并为缔约国和其他利益攸关方提供了建议和替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Responsibility to Protect
Global Responsibility to Protect Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
44.40%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
The Responsibility to Protect: a Bibliography Residual Responsibility to Implement: the AU, the Constitutive Act, and the Responsibility to Protect Notes on Contributors China and Intervention at the UN Security Council: Reconciling Status, written by Courtney J. Fung Beyond the Responsibility to Protect in International Law: An Ethics of Irresponsibility, written by Angeliki Samara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1