Chawton House and its Library: Legacies and Futures

Kim Simpson
{"title":"Chawton House and its Library: Legacies and Futures","authors":"Kim Simpson","doi":"10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1334","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a review of Women’s Writing, 1660-1830: Feminisms and Futures, Paula Backscheider draws attention to “the miracle that is Chawton House, whose conferences nurtured these essays” in the collection. This essay will examine the legacy of this unique institution and explore the futures for the organization both as heritage site and as home to a substantial collection of women’s writing of the long eighteenth century. The community encouraged and nurtured by Chawton House since it opened to the public in 2003, as is so often the case with all things related to Jane Austen, complicates divisions between the academic and the popular, bringing together people of different backgrounds from all over the world. For diverse audiences, Chawton House—the Visiting Fellowship program, the reading group, the reading rooms, the collections, and, increasingly, the gardens and parkland—have provided the time, space, and material to explore, share, and delight in women’s contributions. This essay will celebrate work already done to maintain and shape the legacy of Jane Austen, her contemporaries, and her predecessors—the legacy of the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century literary world. It considers some of the challenges faced by heritage organizations like Chawton House in recovering and representing the work of early British women writers and shaping their legacy, exploring the ways in which issues of canonicity, value and reputation play out in both academic research and public engagement. It outlines some of the strategies used by Chawton House over the last two decades to meet these challenges, including public programming that introduces women writers little-known outside academic circles, but that also asks audiences to consider the conditions that rendered them obscure in the first place. It goes on to consider the ways in which the current moment – both the culture wars and the pandemic—has revitalized these questions of legacy by demanding new perspectives and providing new audiences for heritage organizations.","PeriodicalId":30251,"journal":{"name":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ABO Interactive Journal for Women in the Arts 16401830","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/2157-7129.13.1.1334","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a review of Women’s Writing, 1660-1830: Feminisms and Futures, Paula Backscheider draws attention to “the miracle that is Chawton House, whose conferences nurtured these essays” in the collection. This essay will examine the legacy of this unique institution and explore the futures for the organization both as heritage site and as home to a substantial collection of women’s writing of the long eighteenth century. The community encouraged and nurtured by Chawton House since it opened to the public in 2003, as is so often the case with all things related to Jane Austen, complicates divisions between the academic and the popular, bringing together people of different backgrounds from all over the world. For diverse audiences, Chawton House—the Visiting Fellowship program, the reading group, the reading rooms, the collections, and, increasingly, the gardens and parkland—have provided the time, space, and material to explore, share, and delight in women’s contributions. This essay will celebrate work already done to maintain and shape the legacy of Jane Austen, her contemporaries, and her predecessors—the legacy of the eighteenth- and nineteenth-century literary world. It considers some of the challenges faced by heritage organizations like Chawton House in recovering and representing the work of early British women writers and shaping their legacy, exploring the ways in which issues of canonicity, value and reputation play out in both academic research and public engagement. It outlines some of the strategies used by Chawton House over the last two decades to meet these challenges, including public programming that introduces women writers little-known outside academic circles, but that also asks audiences to consider the conditions that rendered them obscure in the first place. It goes on to consider the ways in which the current moment – both the culture wars and the pandemic—has revitalized these questions of legacy by demanding new perspectives and providing new audiences for heritage organizations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
查顿故居及其图书馆:遗产与未来
在《女性写作,1660-1830:女权主义和未来》的评论中,保拉·巴克谢德尔(Paula Backscheider)提请人们注意“查顿府的奇迹,它的会议孕育了这些文章”。本文将研究这一独特机构的遗产,并探索该组织作为遗产遗址和18世纪大量女性写作的家园的未来。查顿故居自2003年向公众开放以来,就像所有与简·奥斯汀有关的事情经常发生的那样,它鼓励和培育了一个社区,使学术和大众之间的界限复杂化,将来自世界各地不同背景的人聚集在一起。对于不同的读者,查顿之家——访问奖学金项目、阅读小组、阅览室、藏书,以及越来越多的花园和公园——提供了时间、空间和材料来探索、分享和欣赏女性的贡献。这篇文章将庆祝已经完成的工作,以维护和塑造遗产的简·奥斯汀,她的同时代人,和她的前辈-遗产的18和19世纪的文学世界。它考虑了查顿之家(Chawton House)等遗产组织在恢复和展示早期英国女作家的作品并塑造她们的遗产时所面临的一些挑战,探索了经典、价值和声誉问题在学术研究和公众参与中发挥作用的方式。它概述了查顿之家在过去二十年中为应对这些挑战所采取的一些策略,包括通过公共节目介绍在学术界之外鲜为人知的女作家,但同时也要求观众考虑最初使她们默默无闻的条件。它继续考虑当前时刻——文化战争和流行病——通过要求新的视角和为遗产组织提供新的受众,使这些遗产问题重新焕发活力的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
“Before I am Quite Forgot": Women’s Critical Literary Biography and the Future Mary Prince’s Undisciplining Lessons: Counter-Narrative and Testimonio in The History Plotting the Plantationocene with The History of Mary Prince Why Austen, not Burney? Tracing the Mechanisms of Reputation and Legacy Review of Figurations of the Feminine, by Siobhán McIlvanney
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1