A Review on Bank Retreat: Mechanisms, Observations, and Modeling

IF 25.2 1区 地球科学 Q1 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Reviews of Geophysics Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1029/2021RG000761
Kun Zhao, Giovanni Coco, Zheng Gong, Stephen E. Darby, Stefano Lanzoni, Fan Xu, Kaili Zhang, Ian Townend
{"title":"A Review on Bank Retreat: Mechanisms, Observations, and Modeling","authors":"Kun Zhao,&nbsp;Giovanni Coco,&nbsp;Zheng Gong,&nbsp;Stephen E. Darby,&nbsp;Stefano Lanzoni,&nbsp;Fan Xu,&nbsp;Kaili Zhang,&nbsp;Ian Townend","doi":"10.1029/2021RG000761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Bank retreat plays a fundamental role in fluvial and estuarine dynamics. It affects the cross-sectional evolution of channels, provides a source of sediment, and modulates the diversity of habitats. Understanding and predicting the geomorphological response of fluvial/tidal channels to external driving forces underpins the robust management of water courses and the protection of wetlands. Here, we review bank retreat with respect to mechanisms, observations, and modeling, covering both rivers and (previously neglected) tidal channels. Our review encompasses both experimental and in situ observations of failure mechanisms and bank retreat rates, modeling approaches and numerical methods to simulate bank erosion. We identify that external forces, despite their distinct characteristics, may have similar effects on bank stability in both river and tidal channels, leading to the same failure mode. We review existing data and empirical functions for bank retreat rate across a range of spatial and temporal scales, and highlight the necessity to account for both hydraulic and geotechnical controls. Based on time scale considerations, we propose a new hierarchy of modeling styles that accounts for bank retreat, leading to clear recommendations for enhancing existing modeling approaches. Finally, we discuss systematically the feedbacks between bank retreat and morphodynamics, and suggest that to move this agenda forward will require a better understanding of multifactor-driven bank retreat across a range of temporal scales, with particular attention to the differences (and similarities) between riverine and estuarine environments, and the role of feedbacks exerted by the collapsed bank soil.</p>","PeriodicalId":21177,"journal":{"name":"Reviews of Geophysics","volume":"60 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":25.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2021RG000761","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2021RG000761","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Bank retreat plays a fundamental role in fluvial and estuarine dynamics. It affects the cross-sectional evolution of channels, provides a source of sediment, and modulates the diversity of habitats. Understanding and predicting the geomorphological response of fluvial/tidal channels to external driving forces underpins the robust management of water courses and the protection of wetlands. Here, we review bank retreat with respect to mechanisms, observations, and modeling, covering both rivers and (previously neglected) tidal channels. Our review encompasses both experimental and in situ observations of failure mechanisms and bank retreat rates, modeling approaches and numerical methods to simulate bank erosion. We identify that external forces, despite their distinct characteristics, may have similar effects on bank stability in both river and tidal channels, leading to the same failure mode. We review existing data and empirical functions for bank retreat rate across a range of spatial and temporal scales, and highlight the necessity to account for both hydraulic and geotechnical controls. Based on time scale considerations, we propose a new hierarchy of modeling styles that accounts for bank retreat, leading to clear recommendations for enhancing existing modeling approaches. Finally, we discuss systematically the feedbacks between bank retreat and morphodynamics, and suggest that to move this agenda forward will require a better understanding of multifactor-driven bank retreat across a range of temporal scales, with particular attention to the differences (and similarities) between riverine and estuarine environments, and the role of feedbacks exerted by the collapsed bank soil.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
河岸退缩:机制、观测和模型研究综述
河岸后退在河流和河口动力学中起着重要作用。它影响河道的横断面演化,提供泥沙来源,调节生境的多样性。了解和预测河流/潮汐通道对外部驱动力的地貌响应是河道管理和湿地保护的基础。在这里,我们回顾了河岸撤退的机制、观测和建模,包括河流和(以前被忽视的)潮汐通道。我们的综述包括对破坏机制和河岸后退率的实验和现场观察,模拟河岸侵蚀的建模方法和数值方法。我们发现,尽管外部作用力具有不同的特征,但它们可能对河流和潮汐通道的河岸稳定性产生相似的影响,从而导致相同的破坏模式。我们回顾了现有的数据和在一系列空间和时间尺度上的银行撤退率的经验函数,并强调了考虑水力和岩土控制的必要性。基于时间尺度的考虑,我们提出了一种考虑银行撤退的新的建模风格层次结构,从而为增强现有的建模方法提出了明确的建议。最后,我们系统地讨论了河岸退缩与形态动力学之间的反馈,并建议为了推进这一议程,需要更好地理解跨时间尺度的多因素驱动的河岸退缩,特别注意河流和河口环境之间的差异(和相似),以及崩塌的河岸土壤所施加的反馈作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews of Geophysics
Reviews of Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Geophysics Reviews (ROG) offers comprehensive overviews and syntheses of current research across various domains of the Earth and space sciences. Our goal is to present accessible and engaging reviews that cater to the diverse AGU community. While authorship is typically by invitation, we warmly encourage readers and potential authors to share their suggestions with our editors.
期刊最新文献
Carbon Mineralization in Fractured Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review Global Land Subsidence: Impact of Climate Extremes and Human Activities Dynamics, Monitoring, and Forecasting of Tephra in the Atmosphere Age of Stratospheric Air: Progress on Processes, Observations, and Long-Term Trends Managing Induced Seismicity Risks From Enhanced Geothermal Systems: A Good Practice Guideline
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1