The Comparative Plaque Removal Efficacy of Charcoal Based and Non Charcoal Based Manual Toothbrushes: A Clinical Study

S. Janakiram, M. Muthuraj, K. Chithresan, Praveen Krishna Maddur, Megha Madhusoodanan
{"title":"The Comparative Plaque Removal Efficacy of Charcoal Based and Non Charcoal Based Manual Toothbrushes: A Clinical Study","authors":"S. Janakiram, M. Muthuraj, K. Chithresan, Praveen Krishna Maddur, Megha Madhusoodanan","doi":"10.33882/linicaldent.15.30609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The studyaimed to compare the plaque removal efficacy of a novel- charcoal-based and a non-charcoal-based manual toothbrush of standardised toothbrush design.\n\nMaterials And Methods: Sixteen undergraduate students of Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and hospital, Coimbatore, were included in this clinical study. This is a randomised clinical trial with a split-mouth design in which the quadrants that undergo tooth brushing using charcoal-based (test) and non-charcoal-based (control) toothbrushes are randomly selected by tossing a coin. The subjects were asked to refrain from all kinds of oral hygiene practices for 48 hours, following which pre-brushing and post-brushing plaque scores were evaluated by Turesky Gilmore modification of Quigley-Hein plaque index using a two-tone disclosing solution. Tooth brushing was performed by the examiner for a standard time (45sec/quadrant) using the Modified Bass brushing technique with fluoridated toothpaste. \n\nResults: The study's results showed no statistical significance between the values. However, the correlation between the total plaque scores and the assigned toothbrushes was also analysed, and a positive correlation was observed between the total plaque score and the test toothbrush.\n\nConclusion:\nThe plaque removal efficacy of charcoal bristled manual toothbrushes with 0.01mm diameter was found to be more or less the same compared with the similar non-charcoal-based counterpoint (1.89,1.39) respectively.\n\nKey-words: Charcoal-based toothbrush, Modified Bass brushing technique","PeriodicalId":76040,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Indian Dental Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33882/linicaldent.15.30609","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The studyaimed to compare the plaque removal efficacy of a novel- charcoal-based and a non-charcoal-based manual toothbrush of standardised toothbrush design. Materials And Methods: Sixteen undergraduate students of Sri Ramakrishna Dental College and hospital, Coimbatore, were included in this clinical study. This is a randomised clinical trial with a split-mouth design in which the quadrants that undergo tooth brushing using charcoal-based (test) and non-charcoal-based (control) toothbrushes are randomly selected by tossing a coin. The subjects were asked to refrain from all kinds of oral hygiene practices for 48 hours, following which pre-brushing and post-brushing plaque scores were evaluated by Turesky Gilmore modification of Quigley-Hein plaque index using a two-tone disclosing solution. Tooth brushing was performed by the examiner for a standard time (45sec/quadrant) using the Modified Bass brushing technique with fluoridated toothpaste. Results: The study's results showed no statistical significance between the values. However, the correlation between the total plaque scores and the assigned toothbrushes was also analysed, and a positive correlation was observed between the total plaque score and the test toothbrush. Conclusion: The plaque removal efficacy of charcoal bristled manual toothbrushes with 0.01mm diameter was found to be more or less the same compared with the similar non-charcoal-based counterpoint (1.89,1.39) respectively. Key-words: Charcoal-based toothbrush, Modified Bass brushing technique
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
木炭基和非木炭基用手动牙刷去除牙菌斑效果的比较:临床研究
背景:本研究旨在比较标准化设计的新型炭基手动牙刷和非炭基手动牙刷的牙菌斑清除效果。材料与方法:选取哥印拜陀室利罗摩克里希纳牙科学院及医院的16名本科生进行临床研究。这是一项随机临床试验,采用开口设计,通过投掷硬币随机选择使用炭基牙刷(测试)和非炭基牙刷(对照)刷牙的象限。受试者被要求在48小时内停止各种口腔卫生习惯,然后使用双色披露液对刷前和刷后的牙菌斑评分进行评定。由检查者使用改良Bass刷牙技术和含氟牙膏进行标准时间(45秒/象限)的刷牙。结果:本研究结果无统计学意义。然而,我们也分析了菌斑总分与指定牙刷之间的相关性,发现菌斑总分与测试牙刷之间呈正相关。结论:直径0.01mm的炭刷与非炭刷的牙菌斑清除效果基本相同,分别为1.89、1.39。关键词:炭基牙刷;改良巴斯刷法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Coping and Resilience Among Endurance Athletes During the COVID-19 Pandemic.
IF 3.8 3区 心理学Frontiers in PsychologyPub Date : 2022-05-19 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.811499
Brian Harman, Grégory Dessart, Liene Puke, Roberta Antonini Philippe
Administrating the Development of Tourism and Hospitality Industries During the COVID-19 Pandemic
IF 0 Business InformPub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI: 10.32983/2222-4459-2021-5-215-220
A. Ryabev, M. Tonkoshkur, S. Kravtsova
Pandemic, Repair, and Resilience: Coping with Technology Breakdown during COVID-19
IF 0 ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable SocietiesPub Date : 2021-06-28 DOI: 10.1145/3460112.3471965
Rayhan Rashed, M. Rifat, Syed Ishtiaque Ahmed
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength Of Various Core Build – up Materials In Maxillary Anterior Teeth - An In-Vitro Study The Comparative Plaque Removal Efficacy of Charcoal Based and Non Charcoal Based Manual Toothbrushes: A Clinical Study Knowledge and Practices for Peri-Implantitis and Peri-Mucositis amongst dental practitioners: A Questionnaire Based Cross-Sectional study Fear and Anxiety among Dental Professionals to Combat Novel Coronovirus Disease (COVID-19) Outbreak in Mumbai city Cheiloscopy: A preliminary study of lip prints for gender determination
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1