Dual stir bar sorptive extraction using conventional and solvent-assisted approaches including in-situ derivatization followed by thermal desorption and gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for analysis of polyfunctional thiols in white wine samples
Nobuo Ochiai , Kikuo Sasamoto , Frank David , Pat Sandra
{"title":"Dual stir bar sorptive extraction using conventional and solvent-assisted approaches including in-situ derivatization followed by thermal desorption and gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry for analysis of polyfunctional thiols in white wine samples","authors":"Nobuo Ochiai , Kikuo Sasamoto , Frank David , Pat Sandra","doi":"10.1016/j.sampre.2022.100034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A new method, based on the combination of two sorptive extraction methods, namely stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and solvent-assisted stir bar sorptive extraction (SA-SBSE), was developed for the quantitative determination of ultra-trace levels of polyfunctional thiols in white wine. Extraction of 4-methyl-4-sulfanyl-pentan-2-one (4-MSP), 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol (3-SH) and 2-furylmethanethiol (2-FMT) is performed by SA-SBSE combined with <em>in-situ</em> derivatization using ethylpropiolate (ETP), while 3-sulfanylhexyl acetate (3-SHA) is simultaneously extracted in parallel using SBSE, without derivatization. Analysis is performed by thermal desorption in combination with GC-MS/MS operated in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. All <em>four</em> target solutes could be detected in a single GC-MS/MS run at levels below the odor detection threshold (ODT) of the solutes (LODs: 0.20 ng/L for 4-MSP, 2.8 ng/L for 3-SH, 0.27 ng/L for 3-SHA and 0.11 ng/L for 2-FMT). The method could be successfully applied to a set of white wine samples, showing significant differences in polyfunctional thiol concentrations between samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100052,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Sample Preparation","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100034"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582022000316/pdfft?md5=1f41df1bb0c1d35c1ede1bce073bcb9b&pid=1-s2.0-S2772582022000316-main.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Sample Preparation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772582022000316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
A new method, based on the combination of two sorptive extraction methods, namely stir bar sorptive extraction (SBSE) and solvent-assisted stir bar sorptive extraction (SA-SBSE), was developed for the quantitative determination of ultra-trace levels of polyfunctional thiols in white wine. Extraction of 4-methyl-4-sulfanyl-pentan-2-one (4-MSP), 3-sulfanylhexan-1-ol (3-SH) and 2-furylmethanethiol (2-FMT) is performed by SA-SBSE combined with in-situ derivatization using ethylpropiolate (ETP), while 3-sulfanylhexyl acetate (3-SHA) is simultaneously extracted in parallel using SBSE, without derivatization. Analysis is performed by thermal desorption in combination with GC-MS/MS operated in selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mode. All four target solutes could be detected in a single GC-MS/MS run at levels below the odor detection threshold (ODT) of the solutes (LODs: 0.20 ng/L for 4-MSP, 2.8 ng/L for 3-SH, 0.27 ng/L for 3-SHA and 0.11 ng/L for 2-FMT). The method could be successfully applied to a set of white wine samples, showing significant differences in polyfunctional thiol concentrations between samples.