Investigating the Etiology of Sour Knuckles in Postchilled Beef Carcasses

T. Thompson, I. Geornaras, R. Delmore, B. Mcfarlane, K. Belk, M. N. Nair
{"title":"Investigating the Etiology of Sour Knuckles in Postchilled Beef Carcasses","authors":"T. Thompson, I. Geornaras, R. Delmore, B. Mcfarlane, K. Belk, M. N. Nair","doi":"10.22175/MMB.11557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Development of sourness in beef round muscle cuts, such as knuckles, has been a long-standing issue in the beef industry with little characterization. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate and characterize the sour odor associated with beef knuckles using sensory, analytical (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [GC-MS]), and microbiological approaches. Knuckles (n = 10) with no sour odor (control), a slight sour odor, or severe sour odor were collected during fabrication from a commercial beef processing plant. In addition, the synovial fluid from the femur joint, and the femur surface associated with the collected knuckles, were sponge-sampled. Knuckles were separated into 2 halves, with one half subjected to an odor panel, GC-MS, and microbial analyses on the day of collection (day 0). The remaining half was analyzed for odor and microbial populations following 35 d of vacuum-packaged storage at 0°C ± 2°C (day 35). Odor panelists identified differences (P < 0.05) between control and sour knuckles (slight sour odor and severe sour odor) for all attributes tested (off-odor, oxidation, putrid, and sour notes) regardless of storage day. GC-MS analysis found no statistical difference (P > 0.05) in volatiles between control and severe-sour-odor samples. Microbial analysis (aerobic plate counts and lactic acid bacteria counts) of muscle tissue on day 0 and day 35 of storage revealed no (P > 0.05) differences between the 3 treatment groups. Similarly, no (P > 0.05) differences between the treatment groups were obtained following analysis of synovial fluid and femur surface sponge samples for psychrotrophic anaerobic sporeformer counts. The findings of the study indicated that the souring condition in knuckles exists at identifiable intensities with no volatile acid or microbial population differences; therefore, further investigation is needed to determine the etiology.","PeriodicalId":18316,"journal":{"name":"Meat and Muscle Biology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat and Muscle Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22175/MMB.11557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Development of sourness in beef round muscle cuts, such as knuckles, has been a long-standing issue in the beef industry with little characterization. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate and characterize the sour odor associated with beef knuckles using sensory, analytical (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry [GC-MS]), and microbiological approaches. Knuckles (n = 10) with no sour odor (control), a slight sour odor, or severe sour odor were collected during fabrication from a commercial beef processing plant. In addition, the synovial fluid from the femur joint, and the femur surface associated with the collected knuckles, were sponge-sampled. Knuckles were separated into 2 halves, with one half subjected to an odor panel, GC-MS, and microbial analyses on the day of collection (day 0). The remaining half was analyzed for odor and microbial populations following 35 d of vacuum-packaged storage at 0°C ± 2°C (day 35). Odor panelists identified differences (P < 0.05) between control and sour knuckles (slight sour odor and severe sour odor) for all attributes tested (off-odor, oxidation, putrid, and sour notes) regardless of storage day. GC-MS analysis found no statistical difference (P > 0.05) in volatiles between control and severe-sour-odor samples. Microbial analysis (aerobic plate counts and lactic acid bacteria counts) of muscle tissue on day 0 and day 35 of storage revealed no (P > 0.05) differences between the 3 treatment groups. Similarly, no (P > 0.05) differences between the treatment groups were obtained following analysis of synovial fluid and femur surface sponge samples for psychrotrophic anaerobic sporeformer counts. The findings of the study indicated that the souring condition in knuckles exists at identifiable intensities with no volatile acid or microbial population differences; therefore, further investigation is needed to determine the etiology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷却后牛肉尸体中酸指关节的病因研究
牛肉圆形肌肉切口(如指关节)的酸味发展一直是牛肉行业长期存在的问题,很少有表征。因此,本研究的目的是通过感官、分析(气相色谱-质谱分析[GC-MS])和微生物学方法来研究和表征与牛肉指关节相关的酸味。在商业牛肉加工厂的制造过程中收集了无酸气味(对照),轻微酸气味或严重酸气味的指关节(n = 10)。此外,从股骨关节和股骨表面收集指关节的滑液进行海绵取样。将指关节分成两半,其中一半在收集当天(第0天)进行气味检测、气相色谱-质谱分析和微生物分析。剩余一半在0°C±2°C真空包装储存35 d(第35天)后进行气味和微生物种群分析。气味小组成员发现,无论储存日期如何,控制组和酸指节(轻微酸臭和严重酸臭)在所有测试属性(异味、氧化、腐烂和酸味)上都存在差异(P < 0.05)。气相色谱-质谱分析发现,对照与重度酸臭样品挥发物含量差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。贮藏第0天和第35天肌肉组织微生物(好氧平板计数和乳酸菌计数)分析显示,3个处理组间无显著差异(P > 0.05)。同样,在分析滑液和股骨表面海绵样本的厌氧孢子菌计数后,各组间无差异(P > 0.05)。研究结果表明,指关节酸败状况存在可识别的强度,无挥发性酸或微生物种群差异;因此,需要进一步调查以确定病因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Title Pending 17698 Characterization of Pork Loin Chop Color Stability Using Loin Quality Traits and Instrumental Discoloration Measures Supranutritional Supplementation of Vitamin E Influences Myoglobin Post-Translational Modifications in Postmortem Beef Longissimus Lumborum Muscle Determination of the impact of labeling terms on consumer sensory evaluation Product yield and color of fresh beef transported at different refrigerated temperatures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1