Contract-Management Duties as a New Regulatory Device

Q2 Social Sciences Law and Contemporary Problems Pub Date : 2013-05-29 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.2285689
Lorenz Kaehler
{"title":"Contract-Management Duties as a New Regulatory Device","authors":"Lorenz Kaehler","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2285689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years contract management has changed the contractual practice dramatically. More and more, the negotiation, implementation, and review of contracts are carried out with standardized procedures based on information technology. This not only creates new opportunities to organize business but also new opportunities for the legislator to regulate contracts. In addition to the direct determination of the rights and duties of the parties via contract law, he might now regulate the way contracts are managed. First examples of such regulations have already been adopted. The paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of such regulations. On the one hand, they might substitute mandatory contract rules and hence increase freedom of contract between the parties. On the other hand, they can increase the bureaucracy within firms and thus decrease the parties’ freedom.","PeriodicalId":39484,"journal":{"name":"Law and Contemporary Problems","volume":"52 1","pages":"89-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law and Contemporary Problems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2285689","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

In recent years contract management has changed the contractual practice dramatically. More and more, the negotiation, implementation, and review of contracts are carried out with standardized procedures based on information technology. This not only creates new opportunities to organize business but also new opportunities for the legislator to regulate contracts. In addition to the direct determination of the rights and duties of the parties via contract law, he might now regulate the way contracts are managed. First examples of such regulations have already been adopted. The paper describes the advantages and disadvantages of such regulations. On the one hand, they might substitute mandatory contract rules and hence increase freedom of contract between the parties. On the other hand, they can increase the bureaucracy within firms and thus decrease the parties’ freedom.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
合同管理责任作为一种新的监管手段
近年来,合同管理极大地改变了合同实践。越来越多的合同的谈判、执行和审查都是基于信息技术的标准化程序进行的。这不仅为组织商业创造了新的机会,也为立法者规范合同创造了新的机会。除了通过合同法直接确定当事人的权利和义务外,他现在还可以规范合同的管理方式。这类条例的第一批例子已经通过。本文描述了这种规定的优点和缺点。一方面,它们可能取代强制性合同规则,从而增加当事人之间的合同自由。另一方面,它们会增加企业内部的官僚主义,从而减少各方的自由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Law and Contemporary Problems
Law and Contemporary Problems Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊介绍: Law and Contemporary Problems was founded in 1933 and is the oldest journal published at Duke Law School. It is a quarterly, interdisciplinary, faculty-edited publication of Duke Law School. L&CP recognizes that many fields in the sciences, social sciences, and humanities can enhance the development and understanding of law. It is our purpose to seek out these areas of overlap and to publish balanced symposia that enlighten not just legal readers, but readers from these other disciplines as well. L&CP uses a symposium format, generally publishing one symposium per issue on a topic of contemporary concern. Authors and articles are selected to ensure that each issue collectively creates a unified presentation of the contemporary problem under consideration. L&CP hosts an annual conference at Duke Law School featuring the authors of one of the year’s four symposia.
期刊最新文献
The Influence of Re-Selection on Independent Decision Making in State Supreme Courts Voting Rights and the “Statutory Constitution” Challenging Gender in Single-Sex Spaces: Lessons from a Feminist Softball League Treaties and Human Rights: The Role of Long-Term Trends Correcting Federalism Mistakes in Statutory Interpretation: The Supreme Court and the Federal Arbitration Act
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1