Risks to Persian Gulf Cities from Spent Fuel Fires at the Barakah and Bushehr Nuclear Power Plants

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Science & Global Security Pub Date : 2021-05-04 DOI:10.1080/08929882.2021.1951000
Thomas Spence, A. Ahmad
{"title":"Risks to Persian Gulf Cities from Spent Fuel Fires at the Barakah and Bushehr Nuclear Power Plants","authors":"Thomas Spence, A. Ahmad","doi":"10.1080/08929882.2021.1951000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Interest in nuclear power has grown in some Middle Eastern states despite poor economics, seismic activity, and attacks on nuclear facilities in the region. This article assesses risks from cesium-137 release and dispersal from spent nuclear fuel fires at Barakah in the United Arab Emirates and Bushehr in Iran to public health, the water supply, and the food security of major Persian Gulf cities. Doha, Dammam, Al-Hofuf, and Manama are most at risk of receiving 1.5 MBq/m2 for a spent fuel fire at Barakah, while a spent fuel fire at Bushehr could affect Shiraz, Ahvaz, Basrah, and Kuwait City, albeit at lower probabilities. Absent a decision to end nuclear power in the region, options for reducing the potential risks of spent fuel fires on Persian Gulf populations include the timely transfer of spent fuel from pools into safer dry cask storage, multilateral disaster-response planning, and a commitment not to attack nuclear facilities.","PeriodicalId":55952,"journal":{"name":"Science & Global Security","volume":"48 1","pages":"67 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Global Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2021.1951000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Interest in nuclear power has grown in some Middle Eastern states despite poor economics, seismic activity, and attacks on nuclear facilities in the region. This article assesses risks from cesium-137 release and dispersal from spent nuclear fuel fires at Barakah in the United Arab Emirates and Bushehr in Iran to public health, the water supply, and the food security of major Persian Gulf cities. Doha, Dammam, Al-Hofuf, and Manama are most at risk of receiving 1.5 MBq/m2 for a spent fuel fire at Barakah, while a spent fuel fire at Bushehr could affect Shiraz, Ahvaz, Basrah, and Kuwait City, albeit at lower probabilities. Absent a decision to end nuclear power in the region, options for reducing the potential risks of spent fuel fires on Persian Gulf populations include the timely transfer of spent fuel from pools into safer dry cask storage, multilateral disaster-response planning, and a commitment not to attack nuclear facilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴拉卡和布什尔核电站乏燃料火灾对波斯湾城市的风险
尽管经济状况不佳,地震活动频繁,核设施遭到袭击,但中东一些国家对核能的兴趣却在增长。本文评估了在阿拉伯联合酋长国巴拉卡和伊朗布什尔的乏燃料火灾中铯-137的释放和扩散对波斯湾主要城市的公共卫生、供水和粮食安全的风险。多哈、达曼、胡富夫和麦纳麦最有可能因巴拉卡的乏燃料火灾而受到1.5 MBq/m2的影响,而布什尔的乏燃料火灾可能影响设拉子、阿瓦士、巴士拉和科威特城,尽管概率较低。在没有决定终止该地区的核电的情况下,减少乏燃料火灾对波斯湾人口的潜在风险的选择包括及时将乏燃料从池转移到更安全的干桶储存,多边灾难响应计划,以及承诺不攻击核设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Global Security
Science & Global Security INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Utilizing a Virtual Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Digital Twin to Aid in Diversion Pathway Analysis for International Safeguards Applications Editors’ Note Plutonium Production under Uranium Constraint Hypersonic Weapons: Vulnerability to Missile Defenses and Comparison to MaRVs Ceci N’est Pas Une Bombe: Lessons from a Field Experiment Using Neutron and Gamma Measurements to Confirm the Absence of Nuclear Weapons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1