Working from home during COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and issues

E. Bolisani, E. Scarso, Christine Ipsen, Kathrin Kirchner, J. P. Hansen
{"title":"Working from home during COVID-19 pandemic: lessons learned and issues","authors":"E. Bolisani, E. Scarso, Christine Ipsen, Kathrin Kirchner, J. P. Hansen","doi":"10.2478/mmcks-2020-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract During the COVID pandemic, many companies, schools, and public organizations all around the world asked their employees to work from home i.e. to adopt what are called “smart working” modalities. This has and will presumably have a serious impact on both employees and employers, which still needs to be clarified and investigated: indeed, if smart working becomes a common working modality, this may have a significant impact on both organizations and employees. This paper reports the results of an online survey of “smart workers” in Italy during the COVID pandemic, when a great number of employees suddenly moved to working from home with no or little preparation. The study offers interesting indications about the involvement and usefulness perception of smart working by the sampled people and makes it possible to single out different categories of employees based on their attitude towards this modality. Also, it points out the potential impact on socialization among colleagues, and the consequent implications for knowledge sharing and knowledge management. From the collected responses, a fully positive or negative conclusion about working from home was not possible, nor a clear indication about the efficiency and effectiveness of this working modality. The analysis, instead, highlighted the presence of different but numerically similar groups of people, i.e. those who were not satisfied at all with the experience, those who were very satisfied, and those who were “undecided”. Furthermore, respondents underlined the importance and the difficulty to maintain working contacts and the intense use of communication systems made for this purpose. Lastly, collected opinions on positive and negative aspects of working from home provided some practical suggestions about how to successfully implement this solution.","PeriodicalId":44909,"journal":{"name":"Management & Marketing-Challenges for the Knowledge Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"84","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Marketing-Challenges for the Knowledge Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2020-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 84

Abstract

Abstract During the COVID pandemic, many companies, schools, and public organizations all around the world asked their employees to work from home i.e. to adopt what are called “smart working” modalities. This has and will presumably have a serious impact on both employees and employers, which still needs to be clarified and investigated: indeed, if smart working becomes a common working modality, this may have a significant impact on both organizations and employees. This paper reports the results of an online survey of “smart workers” in Italy during the COVID pandemic, when a great number of employees suddenly moved to working from home with no or little preparation. The study offers interesting indications about the involvement and usefulness perception of smart working by the sampled people and makes it possible to single out different categories of employees based on their attitude towards this modality. Also, it points out the potential impact on socialization among colleagues, and the consequent implications for knowledge sharing and knowledge management. From the collected responses, a fully positive or negative conclusion about working from home was not possible, nor a clear indication about the efficiency and effectiveness of this working modality. The analysis, instead, highlighted the presence of different but numerically similar groups of people, i.e. those who were not satisfied at all with the experience, those who were very satisfied, and those who were “undecided”. Furthermore, respondents underlined the importance and the difficulty to maintain working contacts and the intense use of communication systems made for this purpose. Lastly, collected opinions on positive and negative aspects of working from home provided some practical suggestions about how to successfully implement this solution.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2019冠状病毒病大流行期间在家工作:经验教训和问题
在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,世界各地的许多公司、学校和公共组织要求员工在家工作,即采用所谓的“智能工作”模式。这可能会对员工和雇主产生严重的影响,这仍然需要澄清和调查:的确,如果智能工作成为一种常见的工作方式,这可能会对组织和员工产生重大影响。本文报道了在COVID大流行期间对意大利“聪明工人”进行的在线调查结果,当时大量员工突然在没有或几乎没有准备的情况下转向在家工作。这项研究提供了有趣的迹象,表明被抽样的人对智能工作的参与和有用性的看法,并使其有可能根据他们对这种模式的态度来挑选出不同类别的员工。此外,它还指出了对同事之间社会化的潜在影响,以及随之而来的对知识共享和知识管理的影响。从收集到的答复来看,不可能对在家工作作出完全肯定或否定的结论,也不可能明确指出这种工作方式的效率和效力。相反,分析强调了不同但数量相似的人群的存在,即那些对体验完全不满意的人,那些非常满意的人,以及那些“犹豫不决”的人。此外,答复者强调维持工作联系的重要性和困难,以及为此目的大量使用通讯系统。最后,收集了关于在家工作的积极和消极方面的意见,为如何成功实施这一解决方案提供了一些实用的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.70%
发文量
25
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Managing energy performance through heat pumps. Success drivers and barriers in residential sector An innovative conceptual model for education and training on hybrid warfare Sales effect of a software product series’ length in Japan Determinants of digital wallet adoption and super app: A review and research model Capital Market Volatility During Crises: Oil Price Insights, VIX Index, and Gold Price Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1