{"title":"The quiet politics and gentle literary activism behind the battle for Utah’s Bears Ears National Monument","authors":"Laura Smith","doi":"10.1111/area.12609","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the closing weeks of his administration, President Obama used his authority under the 1906 Antiquities Act to designate the 1.35-million-acre Bears Ears National Monument in southern Utah, a redrock landscape sacred to many Native American tribes. With the designation, Bears Ears became the second national monument in Utah—after Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, designated in 1996—where literature and the literary imagination had formed part of the arsenal of campaigners petitioning for the designation. This discussion looks to the works of writers across the American West who have spoken out in defence of Bears Ears (both pre- and post-designation), to consider the place of literature in environmental activism. In particular, this discussion examines how literary activism emerges as a creative yet gently subversive performance, allowing commentators to speak back to an ethics of (ecological) care and responsibility, and to respond to injustices at Bears Ears. Across these two national monuments, and three accompanying and pivotal anthologies, this discussion unpacks and interrogates an ongoing gentle political rhetoric and dialogue surrounding the Bears Ears National Monument. But this quiet resilience has been disrupted, upended by the Trump administration’s review of more than two dozen national monument designations, which specifically targets Bears Ears, but also includes Grand Staircase-Escalante.</p><p>In the closing weeks of his administration, President Obama used his authority under the 1906 Antiquities Act to designate the 1.35-million-acre Bears Ears National Monument in southern Utah, a redrock landscape sacred to many Native American tribes. This discussion looks to the works of writers across the American West who have spoken out in defence of Bears Ears (both pre- and post-designation), to consider the place of literature in environmental activism. In particular, this discussion examines how literary activism emerges as a creative yet gently subversive performance, allowing commentators to speak back to an ethics of (ecological) care and responsibility, and to respond to injustices at Bears Ears.</p>","PeriodicalId":8422,"journal":{"name":"Area","volume":"57 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Area","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://rgs-ibg.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/area.12609","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the closing weeks of his administration, President Obama used his authority under the 1906 Antiquities Act to designate the 1.35-million-acre Bears Ears National Monument in southern Utah, a redrock landscape sacred to many Native American tribes. With the designation, Bears Ears became the second national monument in Utah—after Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, designated in 1996—where literature and the literary imagination had formed part of the arsenal of campaigners petitioning for the designation. This discussion looks to the works of writers across the American West who have spoken out in defence of Bears Ears (both pre- and post-designation), to consider the place of literature in environmental activism. In particular, this discussion examines how literary activism emerges as a creative yet gently subversive performance, allowing commentators to speak back to an ethics of (ecological) care and responsibility, and to respond to injustices at Bears Ears. Across these two national monuments, and three accompanying and pivotal anthologies, this discussion unpacks and interrogates an ongoing gentle political rhetoric and dialogue surrounding the Bears Ears National Monument. But this quiet resilience has been disrupted, upended by the Trump administration’s review of more than two dozen national monument designations, which specifically targets Bears Ears, but also includes Grand Staircase-Escalante.
In the closing weeks of his administration, President Obama used his authority under the 1906 Antiquities Act to designate the 1.35-million-acre Bears Ears National Monument in southern Utah, a redrock landscape sacred to many Native American tribes. This discussion looks to the works of writers across the American West who have spoken out in defence of Bears Ears (both pre- and post-designation), to consider the place of literature in environmental activism. In particular, this discussion examines how literary activism emerges as a creative yet gently subversive performance, allowing commentators to speak back to an ethics of (ecological) care and responsibility, and to respond to injustices at Bears Ears.
在2010年的最后几周,奥巴马总统利用他在1906年《古物法》(Antiquities Act)下的权力,在犹他州南部指定了135万英亩的熊耳国家纪念碑(Bears Ears National Monument),这是一片对许多美国原住民部落来说是神圣的红岩景观。随着这一指定,熊耳朵成为了犹他州的第二座国家纪念碑,仅次于1996年指定的大阶梯-埃斯卡兰特国家纪念碑,在那里,文学和文学想象成为请愿指定的活动家的一部分。本次讨论着眼于美国西部作家的作品,他们在熊耳朵被指定之前和之后都为熊耳朵辩护,并考虑文学在环境行动主义中的地位。特别地,本讨论探讨了文学行动主义是如何作为一种创造性而又温和颠覆性的表演出现的,它允许评论家们回到(生态)关怀和责任的伦理,并对熊耳的不公正做出回应。通过这两个国家纪念碑,以及三个配套的关键选集,这次讨论解开并询问了围绕熊耳国家纪念碑的温和政治言论和对话。但这种平静的韧性被特朗普政府对二十多个国家纪念碑的审查打乱了,这些国家纪念碑专门针对熊耳朵,但也包括大楼梯-埃斯卡兰特。在2010年的最后几周,奥巴马总统利用他在1906年《古物法》(Antiquities Act)下的权力,在犹他州南部指定了135万英亩的熊耳国家纪念碑(Bears Ears National Monument),这是一片对许多美国原住民部落来说是神圣的红岩景观。本次讨论着眼于美国西部作家的作品,他们在熊耳朵被指定之前和之后都为熊耳朵辩护,并考虑文学在环境行动主义中的地位。特别地,本讨论探讨了文学行动主义是如何作为一种创造性而又温和颠覆性的表演出现的,它允许评论家们回到(生态)关怀和责任的伦理,并对熊耳的不公正做出回应。
期刊介绍:
Area publishes ground breaking geographical research and scholarship across the field of geography. Whatever your interests, reading Area is essential to keep up with the latest thinking in geography. At the cutting edge of the discipline, the journal: • is the debating forum for the latest geographical research and ideas • is an outlet for fresh ideas, from both established and new scholars • is accessible to new researchers, including postgraduate students and academics at an early stage in their careers • contains commentaries and debates that focus on topical issues, new research results, methodological theory and practice and academic discussion and debate • provides rapid publication