Professional male modern boxing: An analysis of activity profile by category

Vicente Puchol, Jose Antonio Sanchez Fuentes, Lluís Albesa Albiol, Toni Caparrós Pons
{"title":"Professional male modern boxing: An analysis of activity profile by category","authors":"Vicente Puchol, Jose Antonio Sanchez Fuentes, Lluís Albesa Albiol, Toni Caparrós Pons","doi":"10.47197/retos.v50.99923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to examine modern professional male boxing by analyzing world champions differences between winners and losers by categories. 322 male professional boxers (age 28.95 ± 4.10, height 175.26 ± 9.44 cm, and weight 147.82 ± 31.31 lb) were included in this observational descriptive analysis, through 320 fights separated by weight divisions [Heavy (H) (n = 24), Cruiser (C) (n = 48), Light Heavy (LH) (n = 62), Super Middle Weight (SMW) (n = 17), Middle Weight (MW) (n = 68), Light Middle Weight (LMW) (n = 42), Welter Weight (WW) (n = 49), Light Welter Weight (LWW) (n = 28), Light Welter (LW) (n = 33), Super Feather Weight (SFW) (n = 63), Feather Weight (FW) (n = 66), Super Bantam Weight (SBW) (n = 42), Bantam Weight (BW) (n = 30), Super Fly Weight (SFLW) (n = 39), Flyweight (F) (n = 29)]. Differences were found between winners and losers (U = 57804 - 90908.5; p <.001; d = 0.129 - 0.776) for all the variables analyzed. Four significant correlations were highlighted: %PL (Percentage of Punches Landed) (rho = .630); AVG PLxR (Punches Landed Per Round) (rho = .594); AVG PPLxR (Power Punches Landed Per Round) (rho = .517); %PPL (Percentage of Power Punches Landed) (rho = .672) and differences were also observed between weight categories (H = 32.29 - 93.11; p <.001 - .004), except for %PL, AVG JLxR, %JL (Percentage of Jabs Landed) and %PPL. This data suggests that in order to win these events, fighters must deliver precise punches, especially power punches, and that there are differences between the categories with this type of punch (AVG PPLxR).\nKeywords: Performance, trajectory analysis, punch indicators, power punches, ecological study","PeriodicalId":52896,"journal":{"name":"Retos de la Direccion","volume":"70 2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retos de la Direccion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v50.99923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine modern professional male boxing by analyzing world champions differences between winners and losers by categories. 322 male professional boxers (age 28.95 ± 4.10, height 175.26 ± 9.44 cm, and weight 147.82 ± 31.31 lb) were included in this observational descriptive analysis, through 320 fights separated by weight divisions [Heavy (H) (n = 24), Cruiser (C) (n = 48), Light Heavy (LH) (n = 62), Super Middle Weight (SMW) (n = 17), Middle Weight (MW) (n = 68), Light Middle Weight (LMW) (n = 42), Welter Weight (WW) (n = 49), Light Welter Weight (LWW) (n = 28), Light Welter (LW) (n = 33), Super Feather Weight (SFW) (n = 63), Feather Weight (FW) (n = 66), Super Bantam Weight (SBW) (n = 42), Bantam Weight (BW) (n = 30), Super Fly Weight (SFLW) (n = 39), Flyweight (F) (n = 29)]. Differences were found between winners and losers (U = 57804 - 90908.5; p <.001; d = 0.129 - 0.776) for all the variables analyzed. Four significant correlations were highlighted: %PL (Percentage of Punches Landed) (rho = .630); AVG PLxR (Punches Landed Per Round) (rho = .594); AVG PPLxR (Power Punches Landed Per Round) (rho = .517); %PPL (Percentage of Power Punches Landed) (rho = .672) and differences were also observed between weight categories (H = 32.29 - 93.11; p <.001 - .004), except for %PL, AVG JLxR, %JL (Percentage of Jabs Landed) and %PPL. This data suggests that in order to win these events, fighters must deliver precise punches, especially power punches, and that there are differences between the categories with this type of punch (AVG PPLxR). Keywords: Performance, trajectory analysis, punch indicators, power punches, ecological study
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
职业男子现代拳击:分类活动概况分析
本研究的目的是通过分析世界冠军的赢家和输家在类别上的差异来检验现代职业男子拳击。322名男性职业拳击手(28.95±4.10岁身高175.26±9.44厘米,和体重147.82±31.31磅)包括在这种观察描述性分析,通过320年争斗分离重分歧(重(H) (n = 24),巡洋舰(C) (n = 48),光(LH) (n = 62),超级中等重量(南都)(n = 17),中等体重(MW) (n = 68),光中间重量(流明瓦)(n = 42),混乱的体重(WW) (n = 49),光翻滚重量(LWW) (n = 28),光起伏(LW) (n = 33),超级羽毛重量(SFW) (n = 63),羽毛重量(FW) (n = 66),超级小矮脚猫重量(SBW) (n = 42),小矮脚猫重量(BW) (n = 30),超级苍蝇重量(SFLW) (n = 39),苍蝇重量(F) (n = 29)]。优胜者和失败者之间存在差异(U = 57804 - 90908.5;p <措施;D = 0.129 - 0.776)。突出显示了四个显著的相关性:%PL(出拳率)(rho = .630);AVG PLxR(每回合出拳数)(rho = .594);AVG PPLxR(每发威力冲量)(rho = .517);%PPL(着落的动力冲头百分比)(rho = 0.672),不同重量类别之间也存在差异(H = 32.29 - 93.11;p <。001 - 0.004),但%PL、AVG JLxR、%JL(落针百分比)和%PPL除外。这些数据表明,为了赢得这些比赛,拳击手必须提供精确的出拳,特别是力量出拳,并且这种出拳类型在类别之间存在差异(AVG PPLxR)。关键词:性能,轨迹分析,冲床指标,动力冲床,生态研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
¿Qué saben los escolares gallegos sobre soporte vital básico? Un estudio descriptivo (What do Galician schoolchildren know about basic life support? A descriptive study) Effects of a Sport Education Season of an Alternative Sport on School Climate, Emotional Intelligence, and Perceived Competence of Elementary School Students in a Culturally Diverse Context Modelos de enseñanza del deporte: Un estudio bibliométrico (Teaching models of sport: A bibliometric study) Mistreatment behaviours in the Athlete-coach relationship Condición física y calidad de vida de personas con patologías crónicas graves: programa de ejercicio EfiKroniK (Physical fitness and quality of life of patients with severe chronic diseases: EfiKroniK exercise program)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1