Long-Term Outcomes of Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients: Where Do We Stand?

F. Nicolini, D. Fortuna, G. A. Contini, D. Pacini, D. Gabbieri, R. De Palma, T. Gherli
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes of Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients: Where Do We Stand?","authors":"F. Nicolini, D. Fortuna, G. A. Contini, D. Pacini, D. Gabbieri, R. De Palma, T. Gherli","doi":"10.5761/ATCS.OA.16-00165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE\nThe introduction of transcatheter aortic valves has focused attention on the results of conventional aortic valve surgery in high-risk patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate 5-years outcomes in this category of patients in the current surgical era.\n\n\nMETHODS\nThis is an observational retrospective study of 581 high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from 2008 to 2013, with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 26.6% ± 14.6%. Data were prospectively collected in a database of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy).\n\n\nRESULTS\nOverall 30-day mortality was 9.3%. Stroke rate was 1.5%. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years overall mortality was 18.2%, 30.4%, and 42.2%, cardiac death rate was 3.9%, 9.2%, and 12.9%, stroke rate 2.5%, 7.7%, and 10.2%, re-operation occurrence 0.2%, 0.9% and 1.3%, and new pacemaker implantation was 2.3%, 5.1% and 7.8%. At multivariate analysis, urgency, hemodynamic instability, LVEF ≤30%, NYHA III-IV, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), extra-cardiac arteriopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL remained independent predictors of 5-year mortality.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe results of the current study add weight to the evidence that traditional aortic valve replacement can be performed in high-risk patients with satisfactory 5-year mortality and morbidity. Our study may help to improve decision-making in this category of high-risk patients with aortic valve disease.","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/ATCS.OA.16-00165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

PURPOSE The introduction of transcatheter aortic valves has focused attention on the results of conventional aortic valve surgery in high-risk patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate 5-years outcomes in this category of patients in the current surgical era. METHODS This is an observational retrospective study of 581 high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacement from 2008 to 2013, with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 26.6% ± 14.6%. Data were prospectively collected in a database of Emilia-Romagna region (Italy). RESULTS Overall 30-day mortality was 9.3%. Stroke rate was 1.5%. At 1-, 3-, and 5-years overall mortality was 18.2%, 30.4%, and 42.2%, cardiac death rate was 3.9%, 9.2%, and 12.9%, stroke rate 2.5%, 7.7%, and 10.2%, re-operation occurrence 0.2%, 0.9% and 1.3%, and new pacemaker implantation was 2.3%, 5.1% and 7.8%. At multivariate analysis, urgency, hemodynamic instability, LVEF ≤30%, NYHA III-IV, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), extra-cardiac arteriopathy, cerebrovascular disease, and creatinine >2.0 mg/dL remained independent predictors of 5-year mortality. CONCLUSION The results of the current study add weight to the evidence that traditional aortic valve replacement can be performed in high-risk patients with satisfactory 5-year mortality and morbidity. Our study may help to improve decision-making in this category of high-risk patients with aortic valve disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
高危患者常规主动脉瓣置换术的长期疗效:我们站在哪里?
目的:经导管主动脉瓣的引入引起了人们对高危患者常规主动脉瓣手术效果的关注。本研究的目的是评估这类患者在当前手术时代的5年预后。方法对2008 - 2013年581例接受主动脉瓣置换术的高危患者进行观察性回顾性研究,平均logistic EuroSCORE为26.6%±14.6%。数据在意大利艾米利亚-罗马涅地区的数据库中进行前瞻性收集。结果30天总死亡率为9.3%。卒中发生率为1.5%。1年、3年和5年总死亡率分别为18.2%、30.4%和42.2%,心脏死亡率分别为3.9%、9.2%和12.9%,卒中发生率分别为2.5%、7.7%和10.2%,再手术发生率分别为0.2%、0.9%和1.3%,新起搏器植入率分别为2.3%、5.1%和7.8%。在多因素分析中,急症、血流动力学不稳定、LVEF≤30%、NYHA III-IV、严重慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、心外动脉病变、脑血管疾病和肌酐>2.0 mg/dL仍然是5年死亡率的独立预测因素。结论本研究结果进一步证明,传统的主动脉瓣置换术对高危患者具有满意的5年死亡率和发病率。我们的研究可能有助于改善这类高危主动脉瓣疾病患者的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lateral Dorsal Basal Lung Resection Based on Functional Preserving Sublobectomy Method: Single-Center Experience. A Novel Method of Real-Time Assessment for Coronary Artery Anastomosis Skill. Can Open Distal Repair Be Safely Used in All Patients with Type A Acute Aortic Dissection? Long-Term Outcomes of Simple Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Based on the Initial Aortic Diameter. Total Arterial Revascularization: Evaluating the Length of the Radial Artery in a Composite Graft Configuration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1