List context effects in reading Italian words and nonwords: Can the word frequency effect be eliminated?

Despina Paizi, C. Burani, P. Zoccolotti
{"title":"List context effects in reading Italian words and nonwords: Can the word frequency effect be eliminated?","authors":"Despina Paizi, C. Burani, P. Zoccolotti","doi":"10.1080/09541440903216492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been suggested that when words and nonwords are presented mixed in the same blocks in transparent scripts the word frequency effect can be eliminated. This is either because in reading mixed blocks the lexical route is deemphasised in favour of the nonlexical route (route deemphasis) or because a homogenisation of reaction times occurs for words and nonwords by adjustment of a time criterion for articulation (time criterion). In five experiments using different list manipulations and experimental designs, we assessed the effects of frequency and length in reading aloud words and nonwords in the Italian transparent orthography. The effect of word frequency remained constant irrespective of context manipulation and nonword characteristics. As reading nonwords may be easier in Italian than in English, control over reading processing may be unnecessary for Italian readers. The results are discussed with respect to current computational models of reading.","PeriodicalId":88321,"journal":{"name":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","volume":"11 1","pages":"1039 - 1065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European journal of cognitive psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440903216492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

It has been suggested that when words and nonwords are presented mixed in the same blocks in transparent scripts the word frequency effect can be eliminated. This is either because in reading mixed blocks the lexical route is deemphasised in favour of the nonlexical route (route deemphasis) or because a homogenisation of reaction times occurs for words and nonwords by adjustment of a time criterion for articulation (time criterion). In five experiments using different list manipulations and experimental designs, we assessed the effects of frequency and length in reading aloud words and nonwords in the Italian transparent orthography. The effect of word frequency remained constant irrespective of context manipulation and nonword characteristics. As reading nonwords may be easier in Italian than in English, control over reading processing may be unnecessary for Italian readers. The results are discussed with respect to current computational models of reading.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
列举阅读意大利语单词和非单词时的语境效应:词频效应可以消除吗?
有研究表明,在透明文本中,当单词和非单词混合在同一块中呈现时,可以消除词频效应。这要么是因为在阅读混合块时,词汇路径被弱化,而非词汇路径被弱化(路径弱化),要么是因为通过调整发音的时间标准(时间标准),单词和非单词的反应时间发生了同质化。在五个实验中,我们使用不同的列表操作和实验设计,评估了频率和长度对意大利语透明正字法朗读单词和非单词的影响。词频的影响不受语境操纵和非词特征的影响。由于意大利语阅读非单词可能比英语更容易,因此意大利语读者可能没有必要控制阅读过程。讨论了当前阅读计算模型的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What are the Bayesian constraints in the Bayesian reader? Reply to Norris and Kinoshita (2010) Explanation versus accommodation: Reply to Bowers (2010) Assessing changes in performance and monitoring processes in individual and collaborative tests according to students' metacognitive skills The contribution of familiarity to within- and between-domain associative recognition memory: Use of a modified remember/know procedure Does masked and unmasked priming reflect Bayesian inference as implemented in the Bayesian Reader?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1