The impact of organizational justice and trust on knowledge sharing behaviour

IF 0.5 Q4 MANAGEMENT Upravlenets-The Manager Pub Date : 2022-07-07 DOI:10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-3
Cetin Sabahattin, Merve Davarci, Ayhan Karakaş
{"title":"The impact of organizational justice and trust on knowledge sharing behaviour","authors":"Cetin Sabahattin, Merve Davarci, Ayhan Karakaş","doi":"10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The spread of knowledge sharing provides advantages to organizations in developing new solutions to problems along with a broader informational infrastructure. For this reason, it is important to know the factors affecting the knowledge sharing behaviour of individuals. The study examined the impact of employees’ perceptions of organizational justice and trust on knowledge sharing behaviour. The theories of organizational justice, organizational trust and knowledge sharing behavior constitute the methodological framework of the research. Within the scope of the study, data were collected from 421 participants (68 managers and 353 employees) working in public and private sectors in Bartin province (Turkey), using survey method. Within the scope of the study, organizational justice is divided into four sub-dimensions (procedural, distributive, interpersonal, and informational), and the construct of trust includes two sub-dimensions – trust in the manager and in the organization as a whole. As a result of the study, while no significant relationship was found between procedural justice, distributive justice and knowledge sharing, it was found between interpersonal justice, informational justice and knowledge sharing. In addition, a positive and significant relationship was found between trust in the manager, trust in the organization and knowledge sharing behaviour. According to the findings, it is seen that organizational trust has an important role in the exhibition of knowledge sharing behaviour; as the level of trust in organizations increases, knowledge sharing behaviour is positively affected. At the same time, informational and interpersonal justice dimensions affect knowledge sharing behaviour more than distributive and procedural justice. It is emerging that organizations should give more importance to justice’s informational and interpersonal dimensions.","PeriodicalId":42955,"journal":{"name":"Upravlenets-The Manager","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Upravlenets-The Manager","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29141/2218-5003-2022-13-3-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The spread of knowledge sharing provides advantages to organizations in developing new solutions to problems along with a broader informational infrastructure. For this reason, it is important to know the factors affecting the knowledge sharing behaviour of individuals. The study examined the impact of employees’ perceptions of organizational justice and trust on knowledge sharing behaviour. The theories of organizational justice, organizational trust and knowledge sharing behavior constitute the methodological framework of the research. Within the scope of the study, data were collected from 421 participants (68 managers and 353 employees) working in public and private sectors in Bartin province (Turkey), using survey method. Within the scope of the study, organizational justice is divided into four sub-dimensions (procedural, distributive, interpersonal, and informational), and the construct of trust includes two sub-dimensions – trust in the manager and in the organization as a whole. As a result of the study, while no significant relationship was found between procedural justice, distributive justice and knowledge sharing, it was found between interpersonal justice, informational justice and knowledge sharing. In addition, a positive and significant relationship was found between trust in the manager, trust in the organization and knowledge sharing behaviour. According to the findings, it is seen that organizational trust has an important role in the exhibition of knowledge sharing behaviour; as the level of trust in organizations increases, knowledge sharing behaviour is positively affected. At the same time, informational and interpersonal justice dimensions affect knowledge sharing behaviour more than distributive and procedural justice. It is emerging that organizations should give more importance to justice’s informational and interpersonal dimensions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组织公平和信任对知识共享行为的影响
知识共享的传播为组织开发新的问题解决方案以及更广泛的信息基础设施提供了优势。因此,了解影响个体知识共享行为的因素是非常重要的。本研究考察了员工对组织公平感和信任感对知识共享行为的影响。组织公正理论、组织信任理论和知识共享行为理论构成了研究的方法论框架。在研究范围内,使用调查方法从巴尔丁省(土耳其)的公共和私营部门工作的421名参与者(68名经理和353名员工)中收集数据。在研究范围内,组织公平分为程序、分配、人际和信息四个维度,信任的构建包括对管理者的信任和对组织整体的信任两个维度。结果表明,程序公平、分配公平与知识共享之间不存在显著关系,人际公平、信息公平与知识共享之间存在显著关系。此外,对管理者的信任、对组织的信任与知识分享行为之间存在显著的正相关关系。研究发现,组织信任对知识共享行为的表现具有重要作用;随着组织信任水平的提高,知识共享行为受到积极影响。与此同时,信息公平和人际公平对知识共享行为的影响大于分配公平和程序公平。越来越多的组织应该更加重视正义的信息和人际层面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Regional import substitution policy amid economic sanctions: The case of the Republic of Tatarstan Strengthening personal data regulation in Russia: Economic implications and risks On the coexistence of on-exchange and OTC segments in commodity markets Assessing the boundaries of the airport services market: Grounds for tariff deregulation Monetary policy on launching new production facilities in Russia: Opportunities in the semiconductor market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1