{"title":"Stigmatizing attributions towards depression among South Asian and Caucasian college students","authors":"Natasha Thapar-Olmos, H. Myers","doi":"10.1080/17542863.2017.1340969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study examined differences in stigmatizing attributions, affect, and treatment recommendations between South Asian and Caucasian college students in response to a vignette describing a hypothetical friend who was either male or female, and either South Asian or Caucasian, experiencing symptoms of depression. South Asian participants made significantly higher attributions of responsibility and reported more anger in response to the vignette compared to Caucasian participants, regardless of vignette ethnicity. Both South Asian and Caucasian participants attributed more responsibility and control to the vignette of the same ethnicity compared to the vignette of a different ethnicity, although this effect was slightly stronger for the South Asian participants. Exploratory analyses conducted to examine interactions between participant ethnicity and vignette gender yielded no significant effects. This study suggests that South Asians may have a more stigmatized view of depression than Caucasians, especially when the depressed person is South Asian.","PeriodicalId":38926,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","volume":"5 1","pages":"134 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Culture and Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17542863.2017.1340969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study examined differences in stigmatizing attributions, affect, and treatment recommendations between South Asian and Caucasian college students in response to a vignette describing a hypothetical friend who was either male or female, and either South Asian or Caucasian, experiencing symptoms of depression. South Asian participants made significantly higher attributions of responsibility and reported more anger in response to the vignette compared to Caucasian participants, regardless of vignette ethnicity. Both South Asian and Caucasian participants attributed more responsibility and control to the vignette of the same ethnicity compared to the vignette of a different ethnicity, although this effect was slightly stronger for the South Asian participants. Exploratory analyses conducted to examine interactions between participant ethnicity and vignette gender yielded no significant effects. This study suggests that South Asians may have a more stigmatized view of depression than Caucasians, especially when the depressed person is South Asian.
期刊介绍:
This title has ceased (2018). This important peer-review journal provides an innovative forum, both international and multidisciplinary, for addressing cross-cultural issues and mental health. Culture as it comes to bear on mental health is a rapidly expanding area of inquiry and research within psychiatry and psychology, and other related fields such as social work, with important implications for practice in the global context. The journal is an essential resource for health care professionals working in the field of cross-cultural mental health.Readership includes psychiatrists, psychologists, medical anthropologists, medical sociologists, psychiatric nurses and social workers, general practitioners and other mental health professionals interested in the area. The International Journal of Culture and Mental Health publishes original empirical research, review papers and theoretical articles in the fields of cross-cultural psychiatry and psychology. Contributions from the fields of medical anthropology and medical sociology are particularly welcome. A continuing dialogue between members of various disciplines in various fields is encouraged. The aim of the journal is to encourage its readers to think about various issues which have clouded cross-cultural development of ideas. The journal lays special emphasis on developing further links between medical anthropology, medical sociology, clinical psychiatry and psychology, and implications of the findings on service provisions. The journal is published four times a year. The style of reference is Harvard. All research articles in this journal, including those in special issues, special sections or supplements, have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymized refereeing by at least two independent referees.