Analytical study for neonates with respiratory distress on Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure admitted to NICU of Minia University Hospital

S. Abd-Allah, Abdel-Azeem M. El-Mazary, N. Okaily, E. Hassan, A. Amin
{"title":"Analytical study for neonates with respiratory distress on Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure admitted to NICU of Minia University Hospital","authors":"S. Abd-Allah, Abdel-Azeem M. El-Mazary, N. Okaily, E. Hassan, A. Amin","doi":"10.21608/anj.2019.45817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction:Using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for neonatal respiratory support is highly increasing in low and middle-income countries. It reduces the needs for mechanical ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress (RD) in tertiary hospitals. Objectives:This is a prospective non-randomized study aims to evaluate the role and efficiency of bubble CPAP in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress and correlation of bubble CPAP failure with different studied demographic, clinical and laboratory variable data. Patients and methods: The study included all neonates with respiratory distress admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) Minia University hospital from 1st of January to 31st of December 2017.The study analyzed the rate of failure and response of management of those patients on bubble CPAP and compared them with other different treatment modalities according to variable recorded demographic, clinical and laboratory data. Results: Among the 280 cases, 149 patients (53.2%) were treated with oxygen, 52 patients (18.6%) needed to be treated with bubble CPAP, 79 patients (28.2%) needed to be intubated and mechanically ventilated (MV). Our study showed more incidences of bubble CPAP therapy of RD cases with higher gestational ages and birth weight, milder grades of RD, absence of sepsis in comparison with mechanical ventilation and vice versa for comparison with nasal oxygen therapy. Conclusion:CPAP is an effective treatment of RD leading to significant improvement of outcome reducing hospital stay, need for invasive mechanical ventilation with its harmful adverse effects and thus the case fatality rate of RD cases and so the overall mortality rate of the NICU.","PeriodicalId":8054,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neonatology Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neonatology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/anj.2019.45817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction:Using nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for neonatal respiratory support is highly increasing in low and middle-income countries. It reduces the needs for mechanical ventilation in neonates with respiratory distress (RD) in tertiary hospitals. Objectives:This is a prospective non-randomized study aims to evaluate the role and efficiency of bubble CPAP in treatment of neonatal respiratory distress and correlation of bubble CPAP failure with different studied demographic, clinical and laboratory variable data. Patients and methods: The study included all neonates with respiratory distress admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) Minia University hospital from 1st of January to 31st of December 2017.The study analyzed the rate of failure and response of management of those patients on bubble CPAP and compared them with other different treatment modalities according to variable recorded demographic, clinical and laboratory data. Results: Among the 280 cases, 149 patients (53.2%) were treated with oxygen, 52 patients (18.6%) needed to be treated with bubble CPAP, 79 patients (28.2%) needed to be intubated and mechanically ventilated (MV). Our study showed more incidences of bubble CPAP therapy of RD cases with higher gestational ages and birth weight, milder grades of RD, absence of sepsis in comparison with mechanical ventilation and vice versa for comparison with nasal oxygen therapy. Conclusion:CPAP is an effective treatment of RD leading to significant improvement of outcome reducing hospital stay, need for invasive mechanical ventilation with its harmful adverse effects and thus the case fatality rate of RD cases and so the overall mortality rate of the NICU.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
南京大学附属医院新生儿重症监护病房气泡持续气道正压治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫的分析研究
在低收入和中等收入国家,使用鼻腔持续气道正压通气(CPAP)进行新生儿呼吸支持正在迅速增加。它减少了三级医院新生儿呼吸窘迫(RD)的机械通气需求。目的:这是一项前瞻性非随机研究,旨在评估气泡CPAP在治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫中的作用和效率,以及气泡CPAP失败与不同研究人口统计学、临床和实验室变量数据的相关性。患者和方法:研究纳入2017年1月1日至12月31日在南京大学附属医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治的所有呼吸窘迫新生儿。本研究分析了气泡CPAP患者的失败率和治疗效果,并根据不同的人口统计学、临床和实验室数据,将其与其他不同的治疗方式进行了比较。结果:280例患者中,149例(53.2%)患者需要吸氧治疗,52例(18.6%)患者需要气泡CPAP治疗,79例(28.2%)患者需要插管机械通气(MV)。我们的研究显示,与机械通气相比,胎龄和出生体重较高、RD分级较轻、无脓毒症的RD患者采用气泡CPAP治疗的发生率更高,与鼻氧治疗相比反之亦然。结论:CPAP是一种有效的治疗RD的方法,可显著改善预后,减少RD的住院时间,减少有创机械通气的不良反应,从而降低RD的病死率和NICU的总死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Associated Cardiac Anomalies Detected by Echocardiography in Infants and Children with Congenital Malformations. A Prospective-Analytical Study Perinatal Care and Threshold of Viability; A Great Dilemma Caffeine Citrate in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Fibreoptic Assessment of Post Intubation Laryngotracheal Injuries in Neonatal and Pediatrics Intensive Care Units. A Prospective-Cross Sectional Study The Role of Absolute Monocytic Count in Early Diagnosis of Nercotizing Enterocolitis in Premature Neonates. A Prospective Analytical Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1