‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries

Q1 Social Sciences The Journal of Men's Studies Pub Date : 2022-05-29 DOI:10.1177/10608265221092044
Andrea Waling
{"title":"‘Inoculate Boys Against Toxic Masculinity’: Exploring Discourses of Men and Masculinity in #Metoo Commentaries","authors":"Andrea Waling","doi":"10.1177/10608265221092044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines what discourses and assumed subject positions have emerged about men and masculinity in #MeToo debates. Using feminist critical discourse analysis and an exploratory approach to analyze 163 media articles, five key framings are noted: men are victims of masculinity requiring intervention, men are positioned as inherently ‘good’ or ‘bad’, boys and men are lost and need to be found, men are performative in their ‘awakenings’, and men’s take up of protector or allyship roles may in fact be attempts to be false heroes. The findings of this work note several tensions and contradictions that highlight an overall lack of coherency and agreement regarding men’s engagements with, and roles in, the #MeToo movement. These contradictions and tensions have implications for thinking about gender equality and gendered violence prevention initiatives.","PeriodicalId":22686,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Men's Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"130 - 156"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Men's Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265221092044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

This article examines what discourses and assumed subject positions have emerged about men and masculinity in #MeToo debates. Using feminist critical discourse analysis and an exploratory approach to analyze 163 media articles, five key framings are noted: men are victims of masculinity requiring intervention, men are positioned as inherently ‘good’ or ‘bad’, boys and men are lost and need to be found, men are performative in their ‘awakenings’, and men’s take up of protector or allyship roles may in fact be attempts to be false heroes. The findings of this work note several tensions and contradictions that highlight an overall lack of coherency and agreement regarding men’s engagements with, and roles in, the #MeToo movement. These contradictions and tensions have implications for thinking about gender equality and gendered violence prevention initiatives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“给男孩接种有毒的男子气概”:探索#Metoo评论中关于男人和男子气概的话语
本文研究了在#MeToo辩论中出现的关于男性和男子气概的话语和假设的主题立场。利用女权主义批评话语分析和探索性方法分析了163篇媒体文章,指出了五个关键框架:男性是需要干预的男性气质的受害者,男性被定位为天生的“好”或“坏”,男孩和男人是迷失的,需要被找到,男性在“觉醒”中是表演的,男性扮演保护者或盟友角色实际上可能是试图成为虚假的英雄。这项工作的发现指出了一些紧张和矛盾,这些矛盾突出了男性在#MeToo运动中的参与和角色总体上缺乏一致性和一致性。这些矛盾和紧张关系对思考性别平等和性别暴力预防举措产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
The Journal of Men's Studies
The Journal of Men's Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Male Victims’ Acknowledgement of Sexual Assault and Their Help-Seeking Process. A Qualitative Study Negotiating Non-normative Identities: Gender Nonconforming Malaysian Muslims on Instagram “Show Them Who You Are!”: Ritual Combat and Masculine Identities in Ryan Coogler’s Black Panther Intimate Partner Violence Victimization Among Refugee Men: Prevalence and Correlates With Associated Factors The Relationship Between Masculinity and Help-Seeking Among Australian Men Living in Non-urban Areas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1