A structural model of HIV risk-taking intentions in Barbados

IF 0.3 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES HIV & AIDS Review Pub Date : 2019-01-01 DOI:10.5114/HIVAR.2019.84171
Kimone Phillips, Troy Lorde, Dwayne Devonish
{"title":"A structural model of HIV risk-taking intentions in Barbados","authors":"Kimone Phillips, Troy Lorde, Dwayne Devonish","doi":"10.5114/HIVAR.2019.84171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive explanation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (sexual) risk-taking intentions in Barbados using an extended model derived from the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) using structural equation modelling (SEM). The study extends this model by including two other factors essential for the prediction of an individual’s intention to engage in unsafe sexual behaviours: knowledge about HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and perceived risk of or susceptibility to HIV infection. Material and methods: A structured questionnaire was used as the main data collection tool. The main constructs were: HIV Risk-taking Intentions, Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control, Knowledge of HIV/AIDS, and Perceived Risk. Three models were tested: SEM; a direct effects model; and the traditional TPB model. Results: The traditional TPB model performed best. Attitudes and perceived behavioural control were significant predictors of HIV risk-taking intentions; knowledge of HIV/AIDS and perceived risk of HIV infection had no influence. Conclusions: Behavioural change interventions should focus on changing attitudes towards sex and sexual behaviours among individuals since attitudes are important determinants of intentions. In terms of perceived behavioural control, efforts should be made to identify those persons who find it difficult to control their sexual behaviours. Enhancing these individuals’ self-efficacy beliefs and confidence about condom use and other safe sex practices would curb intentions to engage in risky sexual practices as well as actual behaviours. HIV AIDS Rev 2019; 18, 1: 62-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/hivar.2019.84171","PeriodicalId":53943,"journal":{"name":"HIV & AIDS Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV & AIDS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/HIVAR.2019.84171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of the study was to provide a comprehensive explanation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (sexual) risk-taking intentions in Barbados using an extended model derived from the theory of planned behaviour (TPB) using structural equation modelling (SEM). The study extends this model by including two other factors essential for the prediction of an individual’s intention to engage in unsafe sexual behaviours: knowledge about HIV/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) and perceived risk of or susceptibility to HIV infection. Material and methods: A structured questionnaire was used as the main data collection tool. The main constructs were: HIV Risk-taking Intentions, Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control, Knowledge of HIV/AIDS, and Perceived Risk. Three models were tested: SEM; a direct effects model; and the traditional TPB model. Results: The traditional TPB model performed best. Attitudes and perceived behavioural control were significant predictors of HIV risk-taking intentions; knowledge of HIV/AIDS and perceived risk of HIV infection had no influence. Conclusions: Behavioural change interventions should focus on changing attitudes towards sex and sexual behaviours among individuals since attitudes are important determinants of intentions. In terms of perceived behavioural control, efforts should be made to identify those persons who find it difficult to control their sexual behaviours. Enhancing these individuals’ self-efficacy beliefs and confidence about condom use and other safe sex practices would curb intentions to engage in risky sexual practices as well as actual behaviours. HIV AIDS Rev 2019; 18, 1: 62-69 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/hivar.2019.84171
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴巴多斯艾滋病毒冒险意愿的结构模型
前言:本研究的目的是利用结构方程建模(SEM)从计划行为理论(TPB)衍生的扩展模型,全面解释巴巴多斯人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)(性)冒险意图。该研究扩展了这一模型,纳入了另外两个对预测个人是否有意从事不安全性行为至关重要的因素:对艾滋病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合症(艾滋病)的了解和对艾滋病毒感染的感知风险或易感性。材料与方法:采用结构化问卷作为主要数据收集工具。主要构念为:HIV冒险意愿、态度、主观规范、感知行为控制、HIV/AIDS知识和感知风险。测试了三种模型:SEM;直接效应模型;以及传统的城市规划模式。结果:传统TPB模型效果最好。态度和感知行为控制是HIV冒险意愿的显著预测因子;对艾滋病毒/艾滋病的了解和对感染艾滋病毒风险的认知没有影响。结论:行为改变干预措施应侧重于改变个人对性和性行为的态度,因为态度是意向的重要决定因素。在行为控制方面,应努力查明难以控制其性行为的人。增强这些个体的自我效能感信念和对避孕套使用和其他安全性行为的信心,将抑制从事危险性行为的意图以及实际行为。艾滋病毒/艾滋病Rev 2019;DOI: https://doi.org/10.5114/hivar.2019.84171 . DOI: 10.3969 / j.i ssn . 1001 - 1001
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
HIV & AIDS Review
HIV & AIDS Review INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing Aysoo: a mobile-based self-management application for people living with HIV Survival analysis and predictors of mortality for adult HIV/AIDS patients following antiretroviral therapy in Mizan-Tepi University Teaching Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia: a retrospective cohort study Self-esteem and self-efficacy among HIV-positive adolescents: an intervention study Reverse transcriptase inhibition: a way to defeat HIV Primary syphilis as oral lesion in HIV/AIDS-positive patient: case report of unusual manifestation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1