"The outward shows be least themselves": Speech Acts, Authority, and Visual Ambiguity in The Merchant of Venice

Pub Date : 2021-12-02 DOI:10.5325/intelitestud.23.4.0437
Jeanette E. Goddard
{"title":"\"The outward shows be least themselves\": Speech Acts, Authority, and Visual Ambiguity in The Merchant of Venice","authors":"Jeanette E. Goddard","doi":"10.5325/intelitestud.23.4.0437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:This article uses Judith Butler's work on speech-act theory in Excitable Speech to examine The Merchant of Venice. Portia as a woman and Shylock as a Jew are outsiders, and both use the language of the Venetian ruling class to attempt to become legitimate speakers. In other words, they use the language of the powerful to challenge power. Shylock is unsuccessful in achieving the status of legitimate speaker and is punished for his attempt. In contrast, Portia disguises herself as a man and has a legitimate speaker, Bellario, vouch for her performance. This combination leads to her success. Both Shylock and Portia highlight the exclusions of the Christian Venetian men's normative language, though they do so differently. Shylock highlights that an illegitimate speaker can appropriate the language and the anxiety this creates. Portia's success demonstrates the failure of those in an authoritative position to accurately identify illegitimate speakers. Additionally, Bellario's letter demonstrates that not all authorized speakers are invested in maintaining its exclusive hegemony. This suggests that as long as the exclusions that shore up authority are based at least in part on visual recognition, there exists the possibility of exploiting visual ambiguity to produce the effect of authority.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/intelitestud.23.4.0437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

abstract:This article uses Judith Butler's work on speech-act theory in Excitable Speech to examine The Merchant of Venice. Portia as a woman and Shylock as a Jew are outsiders, and both use the language of the Venetian ruling class to attempt to become legitimate speakers. In other words, they use the language of the powerful to challenge power. Shylock is unsuccessful in achieving the status of legitimate speaker and is punished for his attempt. In contrast, Portia disguises herself as a man and has a legitimate speaker, Bellario, vouch for her performance. This combination leads to her success. Both Shylock and Portia highlight the exclusions of the Christian Venetian men's normative language, though they do so differently. Shylock highlights that an illegitimate speaker can appropriate the language and the anxiety this creates. Portia's success demonstrates the failure of those in an authoritative position to accurately identify illegitimate speakers. Additionally, Bellario's letter demonstrates that not all authorized speakers are invested in maintaining its exclusive hegemony. This suggests that as long as the exclusions that shore up authority are based at least in part on visual recognition, there exists the possibility of exploiting visual ambiguity to produce the effect of authority.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
“外在表现是最不真实的”:《威尼斯商人》中的言语行为、权威与视觉模糊
本文运用巴特勒在《兴奋性言语》中的言语行为理论来考察《威尼斯商人》。作为女人的鲍西娅和作为犹太人的夏洛克都是局外人,他们都使用威尼斯统治阶级的语言,试图成为合法的说话者。换句话说,他们用强权的语言来挑战强权。夏洛克未能取得合法发言人的地位,并因此受到惩罚。相比之下,鲍西娅把自己伪装成一个男人,并有一个合法的发言人贝拉里奥为她的表演担保。这种结合导致了她的成功。夏洛克和鲍西娅都强调了基督教威尼斯人的规范语言的排除,尽管他们的做法不同。鲍西娅的成功证明了那些处于权威地位的人在准确识别非法说话者方面的失败。此外,贝拉里奥的信表明,并非所有授权发言人都致力于维持其独家霸权。这表明,只要支持权威的排除至少部分地基于视觉识别,就存在利用视觉模糊性来产生权威效果的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1