H45 The steps tool: an easy to use assessment measure that highlights impairments impacting stair safety

D. Kegelmeyer, S. Kostyk, David M Kline, K. Ambrogi, A. Kloos
{"title":"H45 The steps tool: an easy to use assessment measure that highlights impairments impacting stair safety","authors":"D. Kegelmeyer, S. Kostyk, David M Kline, K. Ambrogi, A. Kloos","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals with HD have progressive motor, cognitive and behavioral impairments that contribute to difficulty with stair negotiation leading to falls on stairs. To assess stair safety, we developed a tool called the Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) that allows systematic observation of movement and analysis of stair performance. The purpose of this study was to examine 1) the agreement of STEPs ratings between healthcare professionals who were experienced versus novice in movement analysis, and 2) STEPS items with the lowest ratings indicating areas to target fall prevention interventions. Methods Forty ambulatory individuals with a diagnosis of HD (mean age 50.35) participated. Three observers (2 experienced physical therapists (PTs) and one nurse with minimal experience in movement analysis) concurrently rated live performances of the STEPS. Results The nurse’s average total STEPS ratings did not significantly differ from the experienced PTs’ ratings with a difference of -0.05 (CI=-0.53, 0.43; p=0.83). Out of 16 items, the agreement between all raters was less than 75% for continuity of ascent (69%) and descent (72%), foot placement during ascent (74%) and eccentric control of the knee during descent (74%). Individuals with HD were most likely to have difficulty during ascent/descent of stairs with foot placement and trunk stability. Additionally many clients exhibited deficits in balance and eccentric control of the knee during descent. Conclusions Observation for continuity of movement has greater inter-rater variability than other STEPS items. Principal impairments that may negatively impact stair performance in HD are foot placement and control of descent along with trunk stability. Healthcare providers other than PTs can quickly be trained to use the STEPS tool reliably. Future areas to study would be whether therapy aimed at improving foot placement, trunk control and eccentric quadriceps strength would improve safety on stairs.","PeriodicalId":16509,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","volume":"93 1","pages":"A82 - A82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2018-EHDN.223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Individuals with HD have progressive motor, cognitive and behavioral impairments that contribute to difficulty with stair negotiation leading to falls on stairs. To assess stair safety, we developed a tool called the Step Test Evaluation of Performance on Stairs (STEPS) that allows systematic observation of movement and analysis of stair performance. The purpose of this study was to examine 1) the agreement of STEPs ratings between healthcare professionals who were experienced versus novice in movement analysis, and 2) STEPS items with the lowest ratings indicating areas to target fall prevention interventions. Methods Forty ambulatory individuals with a diagnosis of HD (mean age 50.35) participated. Three observers (2 experienced physical therapists (PTs) and one nurse with minimal experience in movement analysis) concurrently rated live performances of the STEPS. Results The nurse’s average total STEPS ratings did not significantly differ from the experienced PTs’ ratings with a difference of -0.05 (CI=-0.53, 0.43; p=0.83). Out of 16 items, the agreement between all raters was less than 75% for continuity of ascent (69%) and descent (72%), foot placement during ascent (74%) and eccentric control of the knee during descent (74%). Individuals with HD were most likely to have difficulty during ascent/descent of stairs with foot placement and trunk stability. Additionally many clients exhibited deficits in balance and eccentric control of the knee during descent. Conclusions Observation for continuity of movement has greater inter-rater variability than other STEPS items. Principal impairments that may negatively impact stair performance in HD are foot placement and control of descent along with trunk stability. Healthcare providers other than PTs can quickly be trained to use the STEPS tool reliably. Future areas to study would be whether therapy aimed at improving foot placement, trunk control and eccentric quadriceps strength would improve safety on stairs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
H45台阶工具:一个易于使用的评估措施,突出影响楼梯安全的损伤
HD患者有进行性运动、认知和行为障碍,导致在楼梯上行走困难,导致在楼梯上摔倒。为了评估楼梯安全性,我们开发了一种工具,称为楼梯性能的台阶测试评估(STEPS),可以系统地观察运动和分析楼梯性能。本研究的目的是检验1)在运动分析方面经验丰富的医疗保健专业人员与新手之间STEPs评分的一致性,以及2)评分最低的STEPs项目表明目标预防跌倒干预的领域。方法40例确诊为HD的患者,平均年龄50.35岁。三名观察员(2名经验丰富的物理治疗师(PTs)和一名缺乏运动分析经验的护士)同时对STEPS的现场表现进行评分。结果护士的平均总STEPS评分与经验丰富的PTs评分无显著差异,差异为-0.05 (CI=-0.53, 0.43;p = 0.83)。在16个项目中,所有评分者对上升(69%)和下降(72%)的连续性、上升时的足部位置(74%)和下降时膝盖的偏心控制(74%)的一致性低于75%。HD患者在上/下楼梯时最可能出现足部放置和躯干稳定方面的困难。此外,许多患者在下降过程中表现出平衡和膝关节偏心控制的缺陷。结论观察运动连续性比其他STEPS项目具有更大的比值变异性。可能对HD患者楼梯性能产生负面影响的主要障碍是脚的位置和控制下降以及躯干的稳定性。PTs以外的医疗保健提供者可以快速接受培训,以可靠地使用STEPS工具。未来的研究领域将是旨在改善足部位置、躯干控制和偏心股四头肌力量的治疗是否会提高楼梯上的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
WED 253 An atypical presentation of sneddon syndrome H29 Practical tools and transfer aids in daily care for clients with advanced hd F06 When and how does manifest hd begin? a comparison of age at onset of motor and non-motor symptoms F33 Task-switching abilities in pre-manifest huntington’s disease subjects F56 Psychiatric symptoms in huntington’s disease: relationship to disease stage in the CAPIT-HD2 beta-testing study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1