Global Income Inequality – A Case Study of OECD Countries and Kazakhstan

S. Jumambayev, A. Dzhulaeva, S. Baimukhanova, G. Ilyashova, A. Dosmbek
{"title":"Global Income Inequality – A Case Study of OECD Countries and Kazakhstan","authors":"S. Jumambayev, A. Dzhulaeva, S. Baimukhanova, G. Ilyashova, A. Dosmbek","doi":"10.18778/1508-2008.25.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents the results of a study into the features of the formation of economic inequality in Kazakhstan in the context of global trends in the country’s development. The methodological basis of the study was a comparative analysis of the former Soviet Union (FSU) and OECD countries in terms of economic development and inequality in the context of global changes and trends, implemented with the help of econometric and economic‑statistical methods. The study revealed a direct statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlation between the level of income concentration of the 10% group and the economic growth of Iceland (r = 0.67) and the Republic of Belarus (r = 0.65). In the case of the Republic of Kazakhstan, no such correlation was found. However, in Kazakhstan, the link between the 10% group’s income concentration and gross domestic product per capita has been established. The dynamics of GDP growth and the values of Kazakhstan’s population’s real money incomes have a stable inverse relationship. The correlation coefficient between them is r = –0.46, and the determination coefficient is R = 0.215, based on data from 2008 to 2020. This suggests that economic growth is still the most important factor that influences the population’s real income. The results of the study will be put into practice by familiarizing government officials with the developed proposals for enhancing the state’s policy of overcoming economic inequality and setting the stage for sustainable economic growth. In addition, the results of this study will be of interest to academic science, actualizing new directions for further research.","PeriodicalId":44249,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Economic Research-Central and Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/1508-2008.25.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents the results of a study into the features of the formation of economic inequality in Kazakhstan in the context of global trends in the country’s development. The methodological basis of the study was a comparative analysis of the former Soviet Union (FSU) and OECD countries in terms of economic development and inequality in the context of global changes and trends, implemented with the help of econometric and economic‑statistical methods. The study revealed a direct statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlation between the level of income concentration of the 10% group and the economic growth of Iceland (r = 0.67) and the Republic of Belarus (r = 0.65). In the case of the Republic of Kazakhstan, no such correlation was found. However, in Kazakhstan, the link between the 10% group’s income concentration and gross domestic product per capita has been established. The dynamics of GDP growth and the values of Kazakhstan’s population’s real money incomes have a stable inverse relationship. The correlation coefficient between them is r = –0.46, and the determination coefficient is R = 0.215, based on data from 2008 to 2020. This suggests that economic growth is still the most important factor that influences the population’s real income. The results of the study will be put into practice by familiarizing government officials with the developed proposals for enhancing the state’s policy of overcoming economic inequality and setting the stage for sustainable economic growth. In addition, the results of this study will be of interest to academic science, actualizing new directions for further research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球收入不平等——以经合组织国家和哈萨克斯坦为例
本文介绍了在国家发展的全球趋势背景下对哈萨克斯坦经济不平等形成特征的研究结果。这项研究的方法基础是在全球变化和趋势的背景下,对前苏联和经合发组织国家在经济发展和不平等方面进行比较分析,并借助计量经济学和经济统计方法加以执行。研究显示,10%群体的收入集中水平与冰岛(r = 0.67)和白俄罗斯共和国(r = 0.65)的经济增长之间存在直接的统计学显著相关性(p < 0.05)。在哈萨克斯坦共和国的情况下,没有发现这种相关性。然而,在哈萨克斯坦,10%群体的收入集中度与人均国内生产总值之间的联系已经确立。GDP增长动态与哈萨克斯坦人口实际货币收入值呈稳定的反比关系。基于2008 - 2020年的数据,两者之间的相关系数为r = -0.46,决定系数为r = 0.215。这表明,经济增长仍然是影响人口实际收入的最重要因素。研究结果将付诸实践,使政府官员熟悉已制定的建议,以加强国家克服经济不平等的政策,并为可持续的经济增长奠定基础。此外,本研究的结果将引起学术界的兴趣,为进一步的研究提供新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Smart Cities for the Sustainable Development of Local Communities: the Cases of the Volyn Region and the City of Lublin Poverty in Selected European Countries. A Spatio-temporal Analysis from 2003–2020 The Impact of Economic Equilibrium, Globalization, Human Development, and Market Competitiveness on the Sustainable Development of Manufacturing Enterprises – the Case of France, Germany, Italy and Poland The Mundell‑Fleming Model and Macroeconomic Stabilization Policies A Reassessment of Oil Market Volatility and Stock Market Volatility: Evidence from Selected SAARC Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1