Understanding Referral Patterns for Bone Mineral Density Testing among Family Physicians: A Qualitative Descriptive Study

IF 1.1 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2016-01-19 DOI:10.1155/2016/2937426
S. Munce, S. Allin, L. Carlin, J. Sale, G. Hawker, Sandra A. Kim, D. Butt, I. Polidoulis, K. Tu, S. Jaglal
{"title":"Understanding Referral Patterns for Bone Mineral Density Testing among Family Physicians: A Qualitative Descriptive Study","authors":"S. Munce, S. Allin, L. Carlin, J. Sale, G. Hawker, Sandra A. Kim, D. Butt, I. Polidoulis, K. Tu, S. Jaglal","doi":"10.1155/2016/2937426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Evidence of inappropriate bone mineral density (BMD) testing has been identified in terms of overtesting in low risk women and undertesting among patients at high risk. In light of these phenomena, the objective of this study was to understand the referral patterns for BMD testing among Ontario's family physicians (FPs). Methods. A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted. Twenty-two FPs took part in a semi-structured interview lasting approximately 30 minutes. An inductive thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data in order to understand the referral patterns for BMD testing. Results. We identified a lack of clarity about screening for osteoporosis with a tendency for baseline BMD testing in healthy, postmenopausal women and a lack of clarity on the appropriate age for screening for men in particular. A lack of clarity on appropriate intervals for follow-up testing was also described. Conclusions. These findings lend support to what has been documented at the population level suggesting a tendency among FPs to refer menopausal women (at low risk). Emphasis on referral of high-risk groups as well as men and further clarification and education on the appropriate intervals for follow-up testing is warranted.","PeriodicalId":45384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Osteoporosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2937426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Introduction. Evidence of inappropriate bone mineral density (BMD) testing has been identified in terms of overtesting in low risk women and undertesting among patients at high risk. In light of these phenomena, the objective of this study was to understand the referral patterns for BMD testing among Ontario's family physicians (FPs). Methods. A qualitative descriptive approach was adopted. Twenty-two FPs took part in a semi-structured interview lasting approximately 30 minutes. An inductive thematic analysis was performed on the transcribed data in order to understand the referral patterns for BMD testing. Results. We identified a lack of clarity about screening for osteoporosis with a tendency for baseline BMD testing in healthy, postmenopausal women and a lack of clarity on the appropriate age for screening for men in particular. A lack of clarity on appropriate intervals for follow-up testing was also described. Conclusions. These findings lend support to what has been documented at the population level suggesting a tendency among FPs to refer menopausal women (at low risk). Emphasis on referral of high-risk groups as well as men and further clarification and education on the appropriate intervals for follow-up testing is warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解家庭医生骨密度检测的转诊模式:一项定性描述性研究
介绍。有证据表明,在低风险妇女中检测过度,在高风险妇女中检测不足,骨密度(BMD)检测不适当。鉴于这些现象,本研究的目的是了解安大略省家庭医生(FPs)的骨密度测试转诊模式。方法。采用了定性描述方法。22名FPs参加了持续约30分钟的半结构化面试。对转录数据进行归纳性专题分析,以了解BMD检测的转诊模式。结果。我们发现骨质疏松症筛查缺乏明确性,在健康的绝经后妇女中有基线骨密度检测的趋势,尤其是在男性筛查的合适年龄方面缺乏明确性。还描述了对后续检测的适当间隔缺乏明确规定。结论。这些发现支持了在人口水平上的记录,表明FPs倾向于转诊绝经期妇女(低风险)。强调高危人群和男性的转诊,并进一步澄清和教育后续检测的适当间隔是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changes in Testing and Treatment Methods in Osteoporosis Care The Effects of Switch Therapy in Osteoporosis Treatment after Romosozumab after Comparing with Prior Treatment Quantitative MR Analysis of Changes in the Radius Bone Marrow in Osteoporosis. Skeletal Manifestations, Bone Pain, and BMD Changes in Albanian Type 1 Gaucher Patients Treated with Taliglucerase Alfa Osteoporosis Screening Disparities among Ethnic and Racial Minorities: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1