More Indigenous than Others: The Paradox of Indigeneity among the Higaunon Lumad

IF 0.3 Q3 AREA STUDIES SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia Pub Date : 2022-04-16 DOI:10.1355/sj37-1b
Oona Paredes
{"title":"More Indigenous than Others: The Paradox of Indigeneity among the Higaunon Lumad","authors":"Oona Paredes","doi":"10.1355/sj37-1b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In the Philippines there is a stark disconnect between the static notion of indigeneity legalized by the state and an emic concept employed by Indigenous peoples themselves. This paper explores indigeneity as operationalized by the Higaunon of Mindanao, one of the island's many Lumad or indigenous groups. Higaunons conceptualize 'indigeneity' as determined by ancestral pedigrees tied strongly to place and geography, and according to the precedence of founding ancestors, whose direct descendants are recognized universally as being 'more indigenous' than others. In the Higaunon case, indigeneity is a modern legal concept with both national and global pretensions, as well as a deeply embedded, pre-existing, highly localized cultural concept that overrides all other considerations. While efforts at poverty alleviation have seen Higaunons emphasize community unity, this indigenous/emic notion of indigeneity continues to intervene where ancestral precedence is at risk of being superseded by 'universal'/etic notions of indigeneity that romanticize an egalitarian ethic and cultural inclination towards democratization. In Mindanao, at least, indigeneity as a working concept depends heavily on how such disconnects are negotiated and reconciled with respect to codes of national and customary law.","PeriodicalId":43547,"journal":{"name":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","volume":"14 1","pages":"27 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOJOURN-Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1355/sj37-1b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In the Philippines there is a stark disconnect between the static notion of indigeneity legalized by the state and an emic concept employed by Indigenous peoples themselves. This paper explores indigeneity as operationalized by the Higaunon of Mindanao, one of the island's many Lumad or indigenous groups. Higaunons conceptualize 'indigeneity' as determined by ancestral pedigrees tied strongly to place and geography, and according to the precedence of founding ancestors, whose direct descendants are recognized universally as being 'more indigenous' than others. In the Higaunon case, indigeneity is a modern legal concept with both national and global pretensions, as well as a deeply embedded, pre-existing, highly localized cultural concept that overrides all other considerations. While efforts at poverty alleviation have seen Higaunons emphasize community unity, this indigenous/emic notion of indigeneity continues to intervene where ancestral precedence is at risk of being superseded by 'universal'/etic notions of indigeneity that romanticize an egalitarian ethic and cultural inclination towards democratization. In Mindanao, at least, indigeneity as a working concept depends heavily on how such disconnects are negotiated and reconciled with respect to codes of national and customary law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比他人更本土化:伊古农原住民的本土化悖论
摘要:在菲律宾,被国家合法化的静态土著概念与土著人民自己使用的地方性概念之间存在着明显的脱节。本文探讨了棉兰老岛的higunon人(岛上众多Lumad或土著群体之一)所实施的土著性。higunons将“土著”概念定义为由与地点和地理紧密相关的祖先谱系决定的,并根据创始祖先的优先顺序,他们的直系后代被普遍认为比其他人“更具土著性”。在higunon案中,土著是一个现代法律概念,具有国家和全球的主张,也是一个根深蒂固的、预先存在的、高度本地化的文化概念,凌驾于所有其他考虑之上。虽然在减轻贫困的努力中,希古农人强调社区团结,但这种土著/地方性的土著观念继续在祖先的优先地位有被“普遍”/遗传的土著观念所取代的危险的地方进行干预,这种观念将平等主义的伦理和民主化的文化倾向浪漫化。至少在棉兰老岛,土著作为一个工作概念在很大程度上取决于如何就这种脱节进行谈判,并根据国家法律和习惯法进行协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Innovative Application of Guangdong Chaoyang Paper Cutting Elements in Cheongsam Design Extension Model of Administration and Management for Business of Community Enterprise The Application of Place-Based Education in Social Studies of Grade 5 Bhutanese Students The Correlation between Hostel Brand Equity Dimensions in Thailand Evaluating English Proficiency Requirement for logistics core competency: CEFR framework for entry-level logisticians in Thailand’s EEC context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1