Imago Dei: la perspectiva de Ibn ʻArabī a la luz de la tradición judeocristiana

IF 0.4 4区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY AL-QANTARA Pub Date : 2020-09-24 DOI:10.3989/ALQANTARA.2020.008
Saeideh Sayari, Mohd Zufri bin Mamat, Maisarah Bint Hasbullah
{"title":"Imago Dei: la perspectiva de Ibn ʻArabī a la luz de la tradición judeocristiana","authors":"Saeideh Sayari, Mohd Zufri bin Mamat, Maisarah Bint Hasbullah","doi":"10.3989/ALQANTARA.2020.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of the divine form of human being has been mentioned in various descriptions in the three largest Abrahamic religions. The Judeo-Christian traditional approach to Imago Dei (The Image of God) holds three major perspectives: substantive, functional , and relational . Ibn ‘Arabī, as a Muslim thinker and mystic, explained this concept through the concept of mirror and two other concepts, namely the ‘Perfect Man’ and God’s vicegerency. He considered the divine form of human being as a mirror through which God manifests Himself. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of Ibn ‘Arabī’s interpretation in light of Judeo-Christian approaches. Ibn ‘Arabī’s explanation includes three approaches. Through the concept of perfect man, Ibn ‘Arabī’s explanation approaches the substantive interpretation, and through the concept of vicegerency, he reveals the functional interpretation. The paper recognizes a relational interpretation of the divine form through some contradictory explanations which can be found in his books. This survey of his explanation also sheds much light on aspects of his anthropological perspective.","PeriodicalId":44299,"journal":{"name":"AL-QANTARA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL-QANTARA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3989/ALQANTARA.2020.008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of the divine form of human being has been mentioned in various descriptions in the three largest Abrahamic religions. The Judeo-Christian traditional approach to Imago Dei (The Image of God) holds three major perspectives: substantive, functional , and relational . Ibn ‘Arabī, as a Muslim thinker and mystic, explained this concept through the concept of mirror and two other concepts, namely the ‘Perfect Man’ and God’s vicegerency. He considered the divine form of human being as a mirror through which God manifests Himself. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of Ibn ‘Arabī’s interpretation in light of Judeo-Christian approaches. Ibn ‘Arabī’s explanation includes three approaches. Through the concept of perfect man, Ibn ‘Arabī’s explanation approaches the substantive interpretation, and through the concept of vicegerency, he reveals the functional interpretation. The paper recognizes a relational interpretation of the divine form through some contradictory explanations which can be found in his books. This survey of his explanation also sheds much light on aspects of his anthropological perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绿头的观点:IbnʻArabī根据传统judeocristiana
人类神性形态的概念在三大亚伯拉罕宗教的各种描述中都有提到。犹太教和基督教对上帝形象的传统看法有三个主要观点:实质、功能和关系。伊本·阿拉伯,作为一个穆斯林思想家和神秘主义者,通过镜子的概念和另外两个概念来解释这个概念,即“完美的人”和上帝的代理。他认为人类的神圣形态是一面镜子,上帝通过它来显示自己。这篇文章提供了一个全面的概述,伊本阿拉伯的解释,根据犹太教和基督教的方法。伊本的解释包括三种方法。通过完美人的概念,伊本的解释接近于实体的解释,通过代理的概念,他揭示了功能的解释。本文通过在他的著作中发现的一些相互矛盾的解释来认识神形的关系解释。对他的解释的调查也揭示了他的人类学观点的许多方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AL-QANTARA
AL-QANTARA Multiple-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
48 weeks
期刊介绍: Al-Qanṭara inició su publicación en 1980, como continuación de Al-Andalus (1933-1978). Al-Qanṭara está dedicada a la civilización del Islam clásico (hasta el siglo XVII incluido) con especial atención al Occidente islámico. Se publica en forma de dos fascículos anuales de unas 250 páginas cada uno. Una sección monográfica aparece en el segundo fascículo de cada año. La revista sólo solicita contribuciones para las secciones monográficas.
期刊最新文献
Cómo aprendió árabe Campomanes: sobre el aprendizaje de lenguas orientales en la Ilustración española La guerra y la esclavización de los moriscos de las Alpujarras (enero a abril de 1569): el reino de Granada como mercado coyuntural de esclavos La versión simple del instrumento al-sarrāŷiyya: comentarios textuales y técnicos Pintura califal de Bédar (Almería, 355/966) Entre musalsal et silsila, une frontière ténue: Le cas de la muṣāfaḥa et de la mushābaka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1