P. H. F. Peres, Maxihilian S. Polverini, M. L. D. Oliveira, J. M. Duarte
{"title":"Accessing camera trap survey feasibility for estimating Blastocerus dichotomus (Cetartiodactyla, Cervidae) demographic parameters","authors":"P. H. F. Peres, Maxihilian S. Polverini, M. L. D. Oliveira, J. M. Duarte","doi":"10.1590/1678-4766E2017041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demographic information is the basis for evaluating and planning conservation strategies for an endangered species. However, in numerous situations there are methodological or financial limitations to obtain such information for some species. The marsh deer, an endangered Neotropical cervid, is a challenging species to obtain biological information. To help achieve such aims, the study evaluated the applicability of camera traps to obtain demographic information on the marsh deer compared to the traditional aerial census method. Fourteen camera traps were installed for 3 months on the Capao da Cruz floodplain, in Sao Paulo State, and 10 helicopter flyovers were made along a 13-kilometer trajectory to detect resident marsh deer. In addition to counting deer, the study aimed to identify the sex, age group and individual identification of the antlered males recorded. Population estimates were performed using the capture-mark-recapture method with the camera trap data and by the distance method for aerial observation data. The costs and field efforts expended for both methodologies were calculated and compared. Twenty independent photographic records and 42 sightings were obtained and generated estimates of 0.98 and 1.06 ind/km², respectively. In contrast to the aerial census, camera traps allowed us to individually identify antlered males, determine the sex ratio and detect fawns in the population. The cost of camera traps was 78% lower but required 20 times more field effort. Our analysis indicates that camera traps present a superior cost-benefit ratio compared to aerial surveys, since they are more informative, cheaper and offer simpler logistics. Their application extends the possibilities of studying a greater number of populations in a long-term monitoring.","PeriodicalId":56300,"journal":{"name":"Iheringia Serie Zoologia","volume":"37 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iheringia Serie Zoologia","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4766E2017041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Demographic information is the basis for evaluating and planning conservation strategies for an endangered species. However, in numerous situations there are methodological or financial limitations to obtain such information for some species. The marsh deer, an endangered Neotropical cervid, is a challenging species to obtain biological information. To help achieve such aims, the study evaluated the applicability of camera traps to obtain demographic information on the marsh deer compared to the traditional aerial census method. Fourteen camera traps were installed for 3 months on the Capao da Cruz floodplain, in Sao Paulo State, and 10 helicopter flyovers were made along a 13-kilometer trajectory to detect resident marsh deer. In addition to counting deer, the study aimed to identify the sex, age group and individual identification of the antlered males recorded. Population estimates were performed using the capture-mark-recapture method with the camera trap data and by the distance method for aerial observation data. The costs and field efforts expended for both methodologies were calculated and compared. Twenty independent photographic records and 42 sightings were obtained and generated estimates of 0.98 and 1.06 ind/km², respectively. In contrast to the aerial census, camera traps allowed us to individually identify antlered males, determine the sex ratio and detect fawns in the population. The cost of camera traps was 78% lower but required 20 times more field effort. Our analysis indicates that camera traps present a superior cost-benefit ratio compared to aerial surveys, since they are more informative, cheaper and offer simpler logistics. Their application extends the possibilities of studying a greater number of populations in a long-term monitoring.
人口统计信息是评估和规划濒危物种保护战略的基础。然而,在许多情况下,获得某些物种的这类资料存在方法上或财政上的限制。沼泽鹿是一种濒危的新热带鹿科动物,是一种具有挑战性的生物信息获取物种。为了帮助实现这一目标,该研究评估了相机陷阱与传统的空中普查方法相比在获取沼泽鹿人口统计信息方面的适用性。在圣保罗州的Capao da Cruz洪漫平原上安装了14个相机陷阱,历时3个月,并沿着13公里的轨迹进行了10次直升机飞行,以探测沼泽鹿。除了计算鹿的数量,这项研究还旨在确定被记录的有角雄性鹿的性别、年龄和个体身份。对相机陷阱数据采用捕获-标记-再捕获法,对空中观测数据采用距离法进行种群估计。计算和比较了两种方法的费用和实地工作。获得了20个独立的摄影记录和42个目击记录,分别产生了0.98和1.06 ind/km²的估计值。与空中普查相比,相机陷阱使我们能够单独识别有鹿角的雄性,确定性别比例并发现种群中的小鹿。相机陷阱的成本降低了78%,但需要20倍的现场工作。我们的分析表明,与航空调查相比,相机陷阱具有更高的成本效益比,因为它们提供的信息更多,成本更低,物流也更简单。它们的应用扩大了在长期监测中研究更多种群的可能性。
期刊介绍:
The journal Iheringia, Série Zoologia, edited by the “Museu de Ciências Naturais” of the “Fundação Zoobotânica do Rio Grande do Sul”, publishes original research findings in zoology with emphasis on taxonomy, systematics, morphology, natural history, and community or population ecology of species from current Neotropical fauna. Scientific notes will not be accepted for publication. Species lists without a taxonomic approach, or that are not the result of studies on the ecology or natural history of communities will not normally be accepted. The same applies to identification keys of groups of taxa defined by political boundaries. Authors wishing to inquire about the scope of the journal or the suitability of a particular topic are encouraged to contact the Editorial Board prior to submission. Furthermore, articles with a main focus on agronomy, veterinary, zootechny or other areas involving applied zoology will not be accepted.
Its abbreviated title is Iheringia, Sér. Zool., which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.