Carrier and Liquid Heat Inactivation of Poliovirus and Adenovirus

S. S. Zhou, C. Wilde, Zheng Chen, Tanya Kapes, JenniferPurgill, R. Nims, D. Suchmann
{"title":"Carrier and Liquid Heat Inactivation of Poliovirus and Adenovirus","authors":"S. S. Zhou, C. Wilde, Zheng Chen, Tanya Kapes, JenniferPurgill, R. Nims, D. Suchmann","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Viral inactivation is typically studied using virus suspended in liquid (liquid inactivation) or virus deposited on surfaces (carrier inactivation). Carrier inactivation more closely mimics disinfection of virus contaminating a surface, while liquid inactivation mimics virus inactiva- tion in process solutions. The prevailing opinion has been that viruses are more susceptible to heat inactivation when suspended in liquid than when deposited on surfaces. In part, this reflects a paucity of comparative studies performed in a side-by-side manner. In the present study, we investigated the relative susceptibilities of the enteroviruses poliovirus-1 and adenovirus type 5 to heat inactivation in liquid versus carrier studies. The results of our side-by-side studies suggest that these two viruses are more readily inactivated when heat is applied to virus deposited on carriers. Decimal reduction values (i.e., the amount of time required to reduce the virus titer by one log 10 ) measured at 46°C displayed the greatest dif- ference between carrier and liquid inactivation approaches, with values ranging from 14.0 to 15.2 min (carrier) and from 47.4 to 64.1 min (liquid) for poliovirus. The corresponding values for adenovirus 5 were 18.2–29.2 min (carrier) and 20.8–38.3 min (liquid). At 65°C, the decimal reduction values were more similar (from 4 to 6 min) for the various inactivation approaches.","PeriodicalId":11317,"journal":{"name":"Disinfection affairs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disinfection affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.76340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Viral inactivation is typically studied using virus suspended in liquid (liquid inactivation) or virus deposited on surfaces (carrier inactivation). Carrier inactivation more closely mimics disinfection of virus contaminating a surface, while liquid inactivation mimics virus inactiva- tion in process solutions. The prevailing opinion has been that viruses are more susceptible to heat inactivation when suspended in liquid than when deposited on surfaces. In part, this reflects a paucity of comparative studies performed in a side-by-side manner. In the present study, we investigated the relative susceptibilities of the enteroviruses poliovirus-1 and adenovirus type 5 to heat inactivation in liquid versus carrier studies. The results of our side-by-side studies suggest that these two viruses are more readily inactivated when heat is applied to virus deposited on carriers. Decimal reduction values (i.e., the amount of time required to reduce the virus titer by one log 10 ) measured at 46°C displayed the greatest dif- ference between carrier and liquid inactivation approaches, with values ranging from 14.0 to 15.2 min (carrier) and from 47.4 to 64.1 min (liquid) for poliovirus. The corresponding values for adenovirus 5 were 18.2–29.2 min (carrier) and 20.8–38.3 min (liquid). At 65°C, the decimal reduction values were more similar (from 4 to 6 min) for the various inactivation approaches.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊髓灰质炎病毒和腺病毒的载体和液体热灭活
病毒灭活通常是用悬浮在液体中的病毒(液体灭活)或沉积在表面的病毒(载体灭活)来研究的。载体灭活更接近于模拟污染表面的病毒的消毒,而液体灭活模拟工艺溶液中的病毒灭活。流行的观点是,病毒悬浮在液体中比沉积在表面上更容易被热灭活。在某种程度上,这反映了以并排方式进行的比较研究的缺乏。在本研究中,我们在液体和载体研究中研究了肠病毒脊髓灰质炎病毒1型和腺病毒5型对热灭活的相对敏感性。我们的并排研究结果表明,当加热沉积在载体上的病毒时,这两种病毒更容易灭活。在46°C下测量的十进制还原值(即将病毒滴度降低1 log 10所需的时间)显示了载体和液体灭活方法之间的最大差异,脊髓灰质炎病毒的值范围为14.0至15.2分钟(载体)和47.4至64.1分钟(液体)。腺病毒5型的对应值为载体18.2 ~ 29.2 min,液体20.8 ~ 38.3 min。在65°C时,各种失活方法的十进制还原值更相似(从4到6分钟)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of entomopathogenic fungi against bed bugs Effect of rheological properties on the antimicrobial activity of isopropyl alcohol The comparative studying food bait for multi-resistant german cockroaches Comparative assessment of the toxicity and virucidal properties of disinfectants used when working with the SARS-CoV-2 virus in isolated virology laboratories Review of current epidemiological risks of introducing infectious diseases into the Russian Federation from the African continent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1