The effect of weed control timing on the growth and yield of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.2298/JAS2101027E
K. Emmanuel, J. A. Aremu, O. Raphael, O. Samuel, G. Jacob
{"title":"The effect of weed control timing on the growth and yield of upland rice (Oryza sativa L.)","authors":"K. Emmanuel, J. A. Aremu, O. Raphael, O. Samuel, G. Jacob","doi":"10.2298/JAS2101027E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weed interference is a major threat to rice production, leading to high yield reduction and reduced profitability. Therefore, field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of the different timings of weed control on the growth and yield of upland rice in the 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons. The treatments consisted of periods when the crop was allowed to be weed-infested for the first 3, 6 and 9 weeks after sowing (WAS) and periods when the weeds were controlled for the first 3, 6 and 9 WAS. Two treatments of weed infestation and weed control until harvest were also included as the checks in a randomized complete block design with three replications. In both years, rice grain yields ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 t ha-1 in plots kept weed-infested until harvest, and from 3.5 to 3.9 t ha-1 in plots kept weed-free until harvest, indicating a 79-83% yield loss with uncontrolled weed growth. Weed infestation for the first 3 WAS did not cause a significant reduction in the growth and yield of rice provided the weeds were removed thereafter. However, the delay in weed control until 9 WAS reduced rice growth and resulted in irrevocable yield reduction. It was only necessary to remove the weeds between 3 and 9 WAS for optimum grain yield, as no significant yield increase was observed in weed control after 9 WAS in both years. This study showed that weed control between 3 and 9 WAS would give the optimum growth and yield of upland rice.","PeriodicalId":14882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade","volume":"191 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/JAS2101027E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weed interference is a major threat to rice production, leading to high yield reduction and reduced profitability. Therefore, field experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of the different timings of weed control on the growth and yield of upland rice in the 2015 and 2016 cropping seasons. The treatments consisted of periods when the crop was allowed to be weed-infested for the first 3, 6 and 9 weeks after sowing (WAS) and periods when the weeds were controlled for the first 3, 6 and 9 WAS. Two treatments of weed infestation and weed control until harvest were also included as the checks in a randomized complete block design with three replications. In both years, rice grain yields ranged from 0.6 to 0.8 t ha-1 in plots kept weed-infested until harvest, and from 3.5 to 3.9 t ha-1 in plots kept weed-free until harvest, indicating a 79-83% yield loss with uncontrolled weed growth. Weed infestation for the first 3 WAS did not cause a significant reduction in the growth and yield of rice provided the weeds were removed thereafter. However, the delay in weed control until 9 WAS reduced rice growth and resulted in irrevocable yield reduction. It was only necessary to remove the weeds between 3 and 9 WAS for optimum grain yield, as no significant yield increase was observed in weed control after 9 WAS in both years. This study showed that weed control between 3 and 9 WAS would give the optimum growth and yield of upland rice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
除草时机对旱稻生长和产量的影响
杂草干扰是水稻生产的主要威胁,导致产量大幅下降和盈利能力下降。为此,通过田间试验,评价了2015年和2016年旱稻种植季不同除草时间对旱稻生长和产量的影响。这些处理包括播种后3周、6周和9周的杂草侵染期和播种后3周、6周和9周的杂草控制期。杂草侵染和杂草控制直到收获的两种处理也包括在随机完全区组设计中进行检查,有三个重复。在这两年中,杂草侵染至收获期的稻田产量为0.6 ~ 0.8 t ha-1,无杂草侵染至收获期的稻田产量为3.5 ~ 3.9 t ha-1,表明在杂草生长不受控制的情况下,水稻产量损失为79 ~ 83%。在前3个WAS中,如果杂草被清除,则杂草侵扰不会导致水稻生长和产量的显著降低。然而,直到9月9日才开始控制杂草,导致水稻生长下降,导致不可逆转的产量下降。仅在3 ~ 9个was之间拔除杂草即可获得最佳产量,因为两个年份在9个was之后的杂草控制均未观察到显著增产。结果表明,3 ~ 9个WAS对旱稻生长和产量最有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade
Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Belgrade Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Sustainability and perspectives of the North Macedonian dairy industry Effect of compost with banana peel and Moringa leaf powders on seed yield and yield components of green gram (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) Comparative evaluation of the productivity of winter crops (wheat [Triticum aestivum L.], rye [Secale cereale L.], triticale [Triticosecale Witt.]) in the western forest-steppe of Ukraine Nutritive value of field pea - oat and common vetch - oat bicrops Application of sodium selenite in the growing technology of white lupin (Lupinus albus L.)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1