Comparative study of sinus earthquake forces and ground motion on structure behavioral response using linear time history analysis method

Suryatama Ageng Pamuji, S. Widodo, M. S. Nugroho, Faqih Ma`arif, Ahmed Wasiu Akande
{"title":"Comparative study of sinus earthquake forces and ground motion on structure behavioral response using linear time history analysis method","authors":"Suryatama Ageng Pamuji, S. Widodo, M. S. Nugroho, Faqih Ma`arif, Ahmed Wasiu Akande","doi":"10.21831/jeatech.v4i1.58666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to calculate the design earthquake with a harmonic sine wave approach at a frequency of 1.5 Hz; 2.5 Hz; 3.5 Hz; 4;5 Hz, as well as Loma Prieta, Northridge, and Kobe ground motion. In addition, a structural response review was also carried out based on a comparison of the effects of the ground motion and sine wave earthquake forces. This study used an experimental method of modelling an apartment building with a scale of 1: 50. The case study was located in Mantrijeron, Yogyakarta, which has a seismic category in the medium-size class. The analysis phase began with material definition, element dimension estimation, modelling by analysis software, loading estimation, structural analysis, and comparison of structural responses based on the deviation. The results indicate that the building model could withstand dynamic loads from harmonic waves up to a frequency of 5.5 Hz for one minute of vibration. The most significant deviation is shown at a frequency of 4.5 Hz with an x-axis direction of 0.110 and a y-direction of 0.160. The structural response resulting from ground motion loading shows that the highest deviation occurred due to the influence of the Kobe earthquake, with a deviation of 0.063 in the x-axis direction and 0.054 in the y-axis direction. Based on these results, the effect of harmonic sine waves is greater than the ground motion loading on the response of the building structure, so it is used as an experimental loading through a vibrating table with the actual residual deviation results showing a value of 0.9 mm in the y-axis direction. The difference in structural response results could be caused by the supports and connections modelling in planning through analysis software which could not precisely represent the actual implementation of the building model.","PeriodicalId":8524,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Engineering and Applied Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21831/jeatech.v4i1.58666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to calculate the design earthquake with a harmonic sine wave approach at a frequency of 1.5 Hz; 2.5 Hz; 3.5 Hz; 4;5 Hz, as well as Loma Prieta, Northridge, and Kobe ground motion. In addition, a structural response review was also carried out based on a comparison of the effects of the ground motion and sine wave earthquake forces. This study used an experimental method of modelling an apartment building with a scale of 1: 50. The case study was located in Mantrijeron, Yogyakarta, which has a seismic category in the medium-size class. The analysis phase began with material definition, element dimension estimation, modelling by analysis software, loading estimation, structural analysis, and comparison of structural responses based on the deviation. The results indicate that the building model could withstand dynamic loads from harmonic waves up to a frequency of 5.5 Hz for one minute of vibration. The most significant deviation is shown at a frequency of 4.5 Hz with an x-axis direction of 0.110 and a y-direction of 0.160. The structural response resulting from ground motion loading shows that the highest deviation occurred due to the influence of the Kobe earthquake, with a deviation of 0.063 in the x-axis direction and 0.054 in the y-axis direction. Based on these results, the effect of harmonic sine waves is greater than the ground motion loading on the response of the building structure, so it is used as an experimental loading through a vibrating table with the actual residual deviation results showing a value of 0.9 mm in the y-axis direction. The difference in structural response results could be caused by the supports and connections modelling in planning through analysis software which could not precisely represent the actual implementation of the building model.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用线性时程分析方法比较地震动和地震力对结构行为反应的影响
本研究采用谐波正弦波法在1.5 Hz频率下计算设计地震;2.5赫兹;3.5赫兹;4;5赫兹,以及洛马普里塔,北岭和神户的地面运动。此外,基于地震动和正弦波地震力影响的比较,对结构的响应进行了回顾。本研究采用1:50比例的公寓建筑模型的实验方法。案例研究位于日惹的Mantrijeron,该地区具有中等规模的地震类别。分析阶段从材料定义、单元尺寸估算、分析软件建模、荷载估算、结构分析以及基于偏差的结构响应比较开始。结果表明,在1分钟的振动中,该建筑模型可以承受频率高达5.5 Hz的谐波动载荷。最显著的偏差显示在频率为4.5 Hz时,x轴方向为0.110,y轴方向为0.160。在地震动荷载作用下的结构响应中,受神户地震影响偏差最大,在x轴方向偏差为0.063,在y轴方向偏差为0.054。综上所述,谐波正弦波对建筑结构响应的影响大于地震动荷载,因此通过振动台将其作为实验荷载,实际残余偏差结果在y轴方向上为0.9 mm。结构响应结果的差异可能是由于规划中通过分析软件进行的支撑和连接建模不能准确地代表建筑模型的实际实施情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fatigue Analysis of Engine Blade Structure Considering Thermal Loads Feature Extraction Based Machine Learning Approach for Bone Cancer Detection Design of brake failure control on motorcycle disc brakes through an integrated cooling system Evaluation of capacity and number of gates for delays and fuel consumption in the FTSP UII parking area Energy balance of thermal and catalytic degradation processes of plastic waste for producing alternative fuel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1