Sirolimus-based, calcineurin inhibitor- free regimen in kidney transplant patients: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial

A. El-Agroudy, S. A. Arrayed, Sumaya AlGhareeb, E. Farid, H. Alhelow, Sadiq Abdulla
{"title":"Sirolimus-based, calcineurin inhibitor- free regimen in kidney transplant patients: An open-label, randomized, controlled trial","authors":"A. El-Agroudy, S. A. Arrayed, Sumaya AlGhareeb, E. Farid, H. Alhelow, Sadiq Abdulla","doi":"10.29333/EJGM/81898","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:We report a prospective, open-label, randomized study to evaluate the safety and efcacy of converting patients with stable renal function from Tacrolimus (Tac)-based regimen to a Sirolimus (SRL)-based regimen after kidney transplantation.Methods:Fifty eight low risk renal allograft recipients who were eligible to the study, 6 months posttransplant and receiving Tac, were randomly assigned to continue Tac (n=29) or convert to SRL (n=29). We evaluated the 3-year outcomes including patient and graft survival, graft function and safety profle.Results:3-year patient and graft survival in SRL and Tac groups was 93.1% vs. 100% (P=0.04), and 89.7% vs. 100% (P=0.04), respectively. However, the SRL group had signifcantly better renal function, from the second year post-transplant until the last follow-up. Four (13.8%) patients in the SRL group and 3 (10.3%) in the Tac group (P=0.5) developed biopsy proven acute rejection. Mean urinary protein excretion increased signifcantly after SRL conversion. Diastolic blood pressure was signifcantly lower in patients who eliminated tacrolimus (80.4 vs. 75.6 mmHg) (P = 0.03). Mean hemoglobin concentrations decreased after SRL conversion and remained signifcantly lower from 12 months to 36 months (P=0.01). The mean serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased signifcantly in the SRL group, (P < 0.05).Conclusions:our experience demonstrates that conversion to sirolimus from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-based therapy may result in better renal function and blood pressure control in renal transplant recipients without an increased risk of acute rejection. However, these benefts have not resulted in a growing advantage in graft or patient survival.","PeriodicalId":12017,"journal":{"name":"European journal of general medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of general medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/EJGM/81898","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background:We report a prospective, open-label, randomized study to evaluate the safety and efcacy of converting patients with stable renal function from Tacrolimus (Tac)-based regimen to a Sirolimus (SRL)-based regimen after kidney transplantation.Methods:Fifty eight low risk renal allograft recipients who were eligible to the study, 6 months posttransplant and receiving Tac, were randomly assigned to continue Tac (n=29) or convert to SRL (n=29). We evaluated the 3-year outcomes including patient and graft survival, graft function and safety profle.Results:3-year patient and graft survival in SRL and Tac groups was 93.1% vs. 100% (P=0.04), and 89.7% vs. 100% (P=0.04), respectively. However, the SRL group had signifcantly better renal function, from the second year post-transplant until the last follow-up. Four (13.8%) patients in the SRL group and 3 (10.3%) in the Tac group (P=0.5) developed biopsy proven acute rejection. Mean urinary protein excretion increased signifcantly after SRL conversion. Diastolic blood pressure was signifcantly lower in patients who eliminated tacrolimus (80.4 vs. 75.6 mmHg) (P = 0.03). Mean hemoglobin concentrations decreased after SRL conversion and remained signifcantly lower from 12 months to 36 months (P=0.01). The mean serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels increased signifcantly in the SRL group, (P < 0.05).Conclusions:our experience demonstrates that conversion to sirolimus from calcineurin inhibitors (CNI)-based therapy may result in better renal function and blood pressure control in renal transplant recipients without an increased risk of acute rejection. However, these benefts have not resulted in a growing advantage in graft or patient survival.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于西罗莫司、无钙调磷酸酶抑制剂的肾移植患者方案:一项开放标签、随机对照试验
背景:我们报告了一项前瞻性、开放标签、随机研究,以评估肾移植后肾功能稳定的患者从他克莫司(Tac)方案转为西罗莫司(SRL)方案的安全性和有效性。方法:58名符合研究条件的低风险肾移植受者,在移植后6个月接受Tac,随机分配继续Tac (n=29)或转换为SRL (n=29)。我们评估了3年的结果,包括患者和移植物存活、移植物功能和安全性。结果:SRL组和Tac组患者3年生存率分别为93.1%∶100% (P=0.04)和89.7%∶100% (P=0.04)。然而,从移植后第二年到最后一次随访,SRL组的肾功能明显更好。SRL组4例(13.8%)患者和Tac组3例(10.3%)患者(P=0.5)发生活检证实的急性排斥反应。SRL转化后平均尿蛋白排泄量显著增加。停用他克莫司的患者舒张压明显降低(80.4比75.6 mmHg) (P = 0.03)。平均血红蛋白浓度在SRL转化后下降,并在12 ~ 36个月期间保持较低水平(P=0.01)。SRL组平均血清胆固醇和甘油三酯水平显著升高(P < 0.05)。结论:我们的经验表明,从钙调磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)为基础的治疗转向西罗莫司可能会改善肾移植受者的肾功能和血压控制,而不会增加急性排斥反应的风险。然而,这些益处并没有在移植物或患者生存方面带来越来越大的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recognizing Limitations: Overcoming Challenges in Enhancing Health and Preventing Disease Stimulation of Vagus By Phenylephrine Increases the Efficiency and Safety of Antidepressants and Anti-Epileptics A Rapidly Fatal Case of Lactobacillus Rhamnosus Sepsis Associated with Thyroid Storm in an Immunocompetent Patient The Value of Longitudinal Strain versus Coronary Angiography in Detection of Coronary Artery Disease Which one in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: Physical examination, laboratory or imaging? A retrospective analysis in the light of pathological results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1