Iron Bioavailability from Ferric Pyrophosphate in Extruded Rice Cofortified with Zinc Sulfate Is Greater than When Cofortified with Zinc Oxide in a Human Stable Isotope Study.

Laura S Hackl, M. Zimmermann, C. Zeder, Megan E. Parker, P. Johns, R. Hurrell, Diego Moretti
{"title":"Iron Bioavailability from Ferric Pyrophosphate in Extruded Rice Cofortified with Zinc Sulfate Is Greater than When Cofortified with Zinc Oxide in a Human Stable Isotope Study.","authors":"Laura S Hackl, M. Zimmermann, C. Zeder, Megan E. Parker, P. Johns, R. Hurrell, Diego Moretti","doi":"10.3945/jn.116.241778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extruded rice grains are often cofortified with iron and zinc. However, it is uncertain if the addition of zinc to iron-fortified rice affects iron absorption and whether this is zinc-compound specific.Objective: We investigated whether zinc, added as zinc oxide (ZnO) or zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), affects human iron absorption from extruded rice fortified with ferric pyrophosphate (FePP).Methods: In 19 iron-depleted Swiss women (plasma ferritin ≤16.5 μ/L) aged between 20 and 39 y with a normal body mass index (in kg/m2; 18.7-24.8), we compared iron absorption from 4 meals containing fortified extruded rice with 4 mg Fe and 3 mg Zn. Three of the meals contained extruded rice labeled with FePP (57FePP): 1) 1 meal without added zinc (57FePP-Zn), 2) 1 cofortified with ZnO (57FePP+ZnO), and 3) 1 cofortified with ZnSO4 (57FePP+ZnSO4). The fourth meal contained extruded rice without iron or zinc, extrinsically labeled with ferrous sulfate (58FeSO4) added as a solution after cooking. All 4 meals contained citric acid. Iron bioavailability was measured by isotopic iron ratios in red blood cells. We also measured relative in vitro iron solubility from 57FePP-Zn, 57FePP+ZnO, and 57FePP+ZnSO4 expressed as a fraction of FeSO4 solubility.Results: Geometric mean fractional iron absorption (95% CI) from 57FePP+ZnSO4 was 4.5% (3.4%, 5.8%) and differed from 57FePP+ZnO (2.7%; 1.8%, 4.1%) (P < 0.03); both did not differ from 57FePP-Zn: 4.0% (2.8%, 5.6%). Relative iron bioavailabilities compared with 58FeSO4 were 62%, 57%, and 38% from 57FePP+ZnSO4, 57FePP-Zn, and 57FePP+ZnO, respectively. In vitro solubility from 57FePP+ZnSO4 differed from that of 57FePP-Zn (14.3%; P < 0.02) but not from that of 57FePP+ZnO (10.2% compared with 13.1%; P = 0.08).Conclusions: In iron-depleted women, iron absorption from FePP-fortified extruded rice cofortified with ZnSO4 was 1.6-fold (95% CI: 1.4-, 1.9-fold) that of rice cofortified with ZnO. These findings suggest that ZnSO4 may be the preferable zinc cofortificant for optimal iron bioavailability of iron-fortified extruded rice. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02255942.","PeriodicalId":22788,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Nutrition Health and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3945/jn.116.241778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Extruded rice grains are often cofortified with iron and zinc. However, it is uncertain if the addition of zinc to iron-fortified rice affects iron absorption and whether this is zinc-compound specific.Objective: We investigated whether zinc, added as zinc oxide (ZnO) or zinc sulfate (ZnSO4), affects human iron absorption from extruded rice fortified with ferric pyrophosphate (FePP).Methods: In 19 iron-depleted Swiss women (plasma ferritin ≤16.5 μ/L) aged between 20 and 39 y with a normal body mass index (in kg/m2; 18.7-24.8), we compared iron absorption from 4 meals containing fortified extruded rice with 4 mg Fe and 3 mg Zn. Three of the meals contained extruded rice labeled with FePP (57FePP): 1) 1 meal without added zinc (57FePP-Zn), 2) 1 cofortified with ZnO (57FePP+ZnO), and 3) 1 cofortified with ZnSO4 (57FePP+ZnSO4). The fourth meal contained extruded rice without iron or zinc, extrinsically labeled with ferrous sulfate (58FeSO4) added as a solution after cooking. All 4 meals contained citric acid. Iron bioavailability was measured by isotopic iron ratios in red blood cells. We also measured relative in vitro iron solubility from 57FePP-Zn, 57FePP+ZnO, and 57FePP+ZnSO4 expressed as a fraction of FeSO4 solubility.Results: Geometric mean fractional iron absorption (95% CI) from 57FePP+ZnSO4 was 4.5% (3.4%, 5.8%) and differed from 57FePP+ZnO (2.7%; 1.8%, 4.1%) (P < 0.03); both did not differ from 57FePP-Zn: 4.0% (2.8%, 5.6%). Relative iron bioavailabilities compared with 58FeSO4 were 62%, 57%, and 38% from 57FePP+ZnSO4, 57FePP-Zn, and 57FePP+ZnO, respectively. In vitro solubility from 57FePP+ZnSO4 differed from that of 57FePP-Zn (14.3%; P < 0.02) but not from that of 57FePP+ZnO (10.2% compared with 13.1%; P = 0.08).Conclusions: In iron-depleted women, iron absorption from FePP-fortified extruded rice cofortified with ZnSO4 was 1.6-fold (95% CI: 1.4-, 1.9-fold) that of rice cofortified with ZnO. These findings suggest that ZnSO4 may be the preferable zinc cofortificant for optimal iron bioavailability of iron-fortified extruded rice. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02255942.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在人体稳定同位素研究中,用硫酸锌强化的膨化大米中焦磷酸铁的铁的生物利用度比用氧化锌强化的高。
背景:膨化米粒通常含有铁和锌。然而,目前还不确定在铁强化大米中添加锌是否会影响铁的吸收,以及这是否是锌化合物特有的。目的:研究以氧化锌(ZnO)或硫酸锌(ZnSO4)形式添加的锌是否影响人体从焦磷酸铁(FePP)强化挤压大米中吸收铁。方法:19名年龄在20 ~ 39岁,身体质量指数(kg/m2;18.7-24.8),我们比较了4顿含4 mg铁和3 mg锌的强化挤压米的铁吸收量。3份添加FePP (57FePP)标记的膨化米饭:1)1份不添加锌(57FePP- zn), 2) 1份添加ZnO (57FePP+ZnO), 3) 1份添加ZnSO4 (57FePP+ZnSO4)。第四顿饭含有不含铁或锌的挤压大米,表面标记为煮熟后添加的硫酸亚铁(58FeSO4)溶液。四餐都含有柠檬酸。铁的生物利用度是通过红细胞中的同位素铁比来测定的。我们还测量了57FePP- zn, 57FePP+ZnO和57FePP+ZnSO4的相对体外铁溶解度,表达为FeSO4溶解度的一部分。结果:57FePP+ZnSO4的几何平均分数铁吸收率(95% CI)为4.5%(3.4%,5.8%),与57FePP+ZnO的几何平均分数铁吸收率(2.7%;1.8%, 4.1%) (p < 0.03);两者与57FePP-Zn: 4.0%(2.8%, 5.6%)无显著差异。57FePP+ZnSO4、57FePP- zn和57FePP+ZnO对铁的相对生物利用度分别为62%、57%和38%。57FePP+ZnSO4的体外溶解度不同于57FePP- zn (14.3%;P < 0.02),但与57FePP+ZnO相比差异不大(10.2%比13.1%;P = 0.08)。结论:在缺铁的女性中,强化氧化锌的fepp挤压大米的铁吸收量是强化氧化锌大米的1.6倍(95% CI: 1.4- 1.9倍)。上述结果提示,硫酸锌可能是提高膨化铁大米铁生物利用度的较优补锌剂。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov注册为NCT02255942。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relationship between adherence to the 2019 Canada's Food Guide recommendations on healthy food choices and nutrient intakes in older adults Comparison of Anemia Screening Methods Using Paired Venous Samples in Women of Reproductive Age in Southern India. Limitations of the Food Compass Nutrient Profiling System. Call for Emergency Action to Limit Global Temperature Increases, Restore Biodiversity, and Protect Health Child Autistic Traits, Food Selectivity, and Diet Quality: A Population-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1