Young Australians Navigating the ‘Careers Information Ecology’

IF 0.5 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Youth Development Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.3390/youth3010020
Steven Roberts, B. Lyall, V. Trott, Elsie Foeken, Jonathan F. Smith, B. Robards, Anna Genat, Darren Graf, Callum Jones, P. Marple, Catherine Waite, Breanna Wright
{"title":"Young Australians Navigating the ‘Careers Information Ecology’","authors":"Steven Roberts, B. Lyall, V. Trott, Elsie Foeken, Jonathan F. Smith, B. Robards, Anna Genat, Darren Graf, Callum Jones, P. Marple, Catherine Waite, Breanna Wright","doi":"10.3390/youth3010020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The policy orientations of advanced neoliberal democracies situate young people as rational actors who are responsible for their own career outcomes. While career scholars have been critical of how this routinely ignores the unequal effects of structural constraints on personal agency, they have long suggested that young people should have access to the best available ‘roadmaps’ and advice to navigate the uncertainties baked into the contemporary economic landscape. Complementing the significant attention that is given to the (potentially emancipatory) experience of formal careers guidance, we present findings from a multi-method study. We explore young Australians’ (aged 15–24) navigation of careers information through a nationally representative survey (n = 1103), focus groups with 90 participants and an analysis of 15,227 social media comments. We suggest that the variety of formal and informal sources pursued and accessed by young people forms a relational ‘ecology’. This relationality is twofold. First, information is often sequential, and engagements with one source can inform the experience or pursuit of another. Second, navigation of the ecology is marked by a high level of intersubjectivity through interpersonal support networks including peers, family and formal service provision. These insights trouble a widespread, but perhaps simplistic, reading of young people having largely internalised a neoliberal sensibility of ‘entrepreneurial selfhood’ in their active pursuit of a range of career advice. Throughout our analysis, we attend to the ways that engagement in the career information ecology is shaped by social inequalities, further underscoring challenges facing careers guidance and social justice goals.","PeriodicalId":46087,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth Development","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/youth3010020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The policy orientations of advanced neoliberal democracies situate young people as rational actors who are responsible for their own career outcomes. While career scholars have been critical of how this routinely ignores the unequal effects of structural constraints on personal agency, they have long suggested that young people should have access to the best available ‘roadmaps’ and advice to navigate the uncertainties baked into the contemporary economic landscape. Complementing the significant attention that is given to the (potentially emancipatory) experience of formal careers guidance, we present findings from a multi-method study. We explore young Australians’ (aged 15–24) navigation of careers information through a nationally representative survey (n = 1103), focus groups with 90 participants and an analysis of 15,227 social media comments. We suggest that the variety of formal and informal sources pursued and accessed by young people forms a relational ‘ecology’. This relationality is twofold. First, information is often sequential, and engagements with one source can inform the experience or pursuit of another. Second, navigation of the ecology is marked by a high level of intersubjectivity through interpersonal support networks including peers, family and formal service provision. These insights trouble a widespread, but perhaps simplistic, reading of young people having largely internalised a neoliberal sensibility of ‘entrepreneurial selfhood’ in their active pursuit of a range of career advice. Throughout our analysis, we attend to the ways that engagement in the career information ecology is shaped by social inequalities, further underscoring challenges facing careers guidance and social justice goals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚年轻人驾驭“职业信息生态”
先进的新自由主义民主国家的政策取向将年轻人定位为理性的行为者,他们对自己的职业结果负责。尽管职业学者一直批评这种做法忽视了结构性约束对个人能力的不平等影响,但他们长期以来一直建议,年轻人应该有机会获得最好的“路线图”和建议,以应对当代经济格局中存在的不确定性。作为对正式职业指导(潜在的解放性)经验的重要关注的补充,我们提出了一项多方法研究的结果。我们通过一项具有全国代表性的调查(n = 1103)、90名参与者的焦点小组和对15,227条社交媒体评论的分析,探讨了澳大利亚年轻人(15-24岁)对职业信息的导航。我们认为,年轻人追求和获取的各种正式和非正式资源形成了一种关系“生态”。这种关系是双重的。首先,信息通常是连续的,与一个来源的接触可以告知另一个来源的经验或追求。其次,通过同伴、家庭和正式服务提供等人际支持网络,主体间性水平很高,这是生态导航的标志。这些见解困扰着一种普遍的,但可能过于简单化的解读,即年轻人在积极寻求一系列职业建议的过程中,在很大程度上内化了一种新自由主义的“企业家自我”敏感性。在整个分析过程中,我们关注了社会不平等塑造职业信息生态的方式,进一步强调了职业指导和社会公正目标所面临的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Youth Development
Journal of Youth Development PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
26
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Friendship: The ‘Achilles Heel’ of European Youth Work Policy “I Don’t Feel Like There’s Enough Awareness about the Damage That Social Media Does”: A Thematic Analysis of the Relationships between Social Media Use, Mental Wellbeing, and Care Experience “It Feels like You’re a Stranger in Your Own Skin”: Young People’s Accounts of Everyday Embodiment “Only Time Will Tell”: The Underexplored Impacts of Lead Poisoning and COVID-19 on Pre-Existing ACEs in New York Outcomes beyond Evaluation: The Impetus and Measure of Relationships within Alternative Provisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1