Is the transition to formal leadership caused by trait extraversion? A counterfactual hazard analysis using two large panel datasets

IF 9.1 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Leadership Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101565
Andrew Spark , Peter J. O'Connor , Nerina L. Jimmieson , Cornelia Niessen
{"title":"Is the transition to formal leadership caused by trait extraversion? A counterfactual hazard analysis using two large panel datasets","authors":"Andrew Spark ,&nbsp;Peter J. O'Connor ,&nbsp;Nerina L. Jimmieson ,&nbsp;Cornelia Niessen","doi":"10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101565","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extraversion is a consistent predictor of informal leader emergence, however little is known about extraversion’s <em>causal effect</em> in terms of predicting the <em>transition to formal leadership</em>. Using two large household samples from Germany (Study 1, <em>n<sub>1</sub></em> = 6,709) and Australia (Study 2, <em>n<sub>2</sub></em><span><span> = 6,056), we test whether trait extraversion predicts the transition of employed persons into formal leadership positions. Using survival analysis with Cox </span>proportional hazards regression<span> within a non-linear generalised additive modelling (GAM) framework, we modelled the relationship between extraversion and the ‘hazard’ of transitioning into a formal leadership role. After controlling for sex, height, age, education and the other big five traits, we found that extraversion consistently predicted the hazard of transitioning into a formal leadership role over time. Given the importance of leadership to life outcomes, being more likely to transition into a formal leadership role may afford extraverts with considerable cumulative benefits over their career.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48434,"journal":{"name":"Leadership Quarterly","volume":"33 2","pages":"Article 101565"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1048984321000709","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Extraversion is a consistent predictor of informal leader emergence, however little is known about extraversion’s causal effect in terms of predicting the transition to formal leadership. Using two large household samples from Germany (Study 1, n1 = 6,709) and Australia (Study 2, n2 = 6,056), we test whether trait extraversion predicts the transition of employed persons into formal leadership positions. Using survival analysis with Cox proportional hazards regression within a non-linear generalised additive modelling (GAM) framework, we modelled the relationship between extraversion and the ‘hazard’ of transitioning into a formal leadership role. After controlling for sex, height, age, education and the other big five traits, we found that extraversion consistently predicted the hazard of transitioning into a formal leadership role over time. Given the importance of leadership to life outcomes, being more likely to transition into a formal leadership role may afford extraverts with considerable cumulative benefits over their career.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
向正式领导的转变是由性格外向性引起的吗?使用两个大型面板数据集的反事实危害分析
外向性是非正式领导出现的一致预测因素,然而,关于外向性在预测正式领导过渡方面的因果效应,我们所知甚少。利用德国(研究1,n1 = 6709)和澳大利亚(研究2,n2 = 6056)的两个大型家庭样本,我们检验了特质外向性是否能预测雇员向正式领导职位的转变。在非线性广义加性建模(GAM)框架内,我们使用Cox比例风险回归的生存分析,模拟了外向性与过渡到正式领导角色的“风险”之间的关系。在控制了性别、身高、年龄、受教育程度和其他五大特征之后,我们发现,随着时间的推移,外向性一致地预测了过渡到正式领导角色的风险。鉴于领导力对生活结果的重要性,更有可能转变为正式的领导角色,可能会给外向者的职业生涯带来可观的累积收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: The Leadership Quarterly is a social-science journal dedicated to advancing our understanding of leadership as a phenomenon, how to study it, as well as its practical implications. Leadership Quarterly seeks contributions from various disciplinary perspectives, including psychology broadly defined (i.e., industrial-organizational, social, evolutionary, biological, differential), management (i.e., organizational behavior, strategy, organizational theory), political science, sociology, economics (i.e., personnel, behavioral, labor), anthropology, history, and methodology.Equally desirable are contributions from multidisciplinary perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Exogenous shocks: Definitions, types, and causal identification issues Editorial Board Advancing Organizational Science With Computational Process Theories The research transparency index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1