IDENTIFICATION OF BASIC TECHNOLOGY DIFFICULT TOPICS AS PERCEIVED BY UPPER BASIC EDUCATION TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN IBADAN METROPOLIS

A. A. Abd-el-Aziz, J. A. Jimoh, Abdullahi Muhammad Hassan
{"title":"IDENTIFICATION OF BASIC TECHNOLOGY DIFFICULT TOPICS AS PERCEIVED BY UPPER BASIC EDUCATION TEACHERS AND STUDENTS IN IBADAN METROPOLIS","authors":"A. A. Abd-el-Aziz, J. A. Jimoh, Abdullahi Muhammad Hassan","doi":"10.24191/e-aj.v9i1.9519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study identified basic technology difficult topics in upper basic curriculum as perceived by teachers and students in Ibadan metropolis. A research question and one hypothesis guided the study. The study adopted a descriptive survey of the correlational research design using multi-stage sampling technique. “Questionnaire for Identification of Basic Technology Difficult Topics in Upper Basic Education” (QIBT-DTUBE) was the main instrument for data collection. Face and content validity of QIBT-DTUBE was established by three technology education experts. The reliability coefficient for QIBT-DTUBE yielded 0.91 using Cronbach Alpha reliability technique. Research questions were analyzed using Mean and Standard deviation while the null hypotheses were tested at .05 level of significance using t-test statistics. Result obtained indicated that teachers and students perceived ten topics as difficult to teach and learn while the students identified additional nine topics that are difficult to learn. More so, a significant difference exists between the mean ratings of upper basic education teachers and students on their perceived levels of difficulty of basic technology topics. Based on these findings, it was recommended among others that basic technology specialist teachers be supported with appropriate trainings and refresher courses on all the topics identified as difficult. \nKeywords: Difficult Topics, Basic Technology, Basic Education Curriculum, Teachers’ Perception, Students’ Perception","PeriodicalId":11454,"journal":{"name":"e-Academia Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"e-Academia Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24191/e-aj.v9i1.9519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The study identified basic technology difficult topics in upper basic curriculum as perceived by teachers and students in Ibadan metropolis. A research question and one hypothesis guided the study. The study adopted a descriptive survey of the correlational research design using multi-stage sampling technique. “Questionnaire for Identification of Basic Technology Difficult Topics in Upper Basic Education” (QIBT-DTUBE) was the main instrument for data collection. Face and content validity of QIBT-DTUBE was established by three technology education experts. The reliability coefficient for QIBT-DTUBE yielded 0.91 using Cronbach Alpha reliability technique. Research questions were analyzed using Mean and Standard deviation while the null hypotheses were tested at .05 level of significance using t-test statistics. Result obtained indicated that teachers and students perceived ten topics as difficult to teach and learn while the students identified additional nine topics that are difficult to learn. More so, a significant difference exists between the mean ratings of upper basic education teachers and students on their perceived levels of difficulty of basic technology topics. Based on these findings, it was recommended among others that basic technology specialist teachers be supported with appropriate trainings and refresher courses on all the topics identified as difficult. Keywords: Difficult Topics, Basic Technology, Basic Education Curriculum, Teachers’ Perception, Students’ Perception
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊巴丹市高等基础教育教师和学生对基础技术难题的认知
该研究确定了伊巴丹市教师和学生认为基础课程高年级的基础技术难题。一个研究问题和一个假设指导了这项研究。本研究采用描述性调查的相关研究设计,采用多阶段抽样技术。“高等基础教育基础技术难点识别问卷”(QIBT-DTUBE)是数据收集的主要工具。QIBT-DTUBE的面效度和内容效度是由三位技术教育专家共同制定的。采用Cronbach Alpha信度法,QIBT-DTUBE的信度系数为0.91。研究问题采用均值和标准差进行分析,零假设采用t检验统计量在0.05显著性水平上进行检验。结果表明,教师和学生认为有10个主题是难教难学的,而学生认为另外9个主题是难学的。更重要的是,高年级基础教育教师和学生对基础技术主题的难度感知水平的平均评分存在显著差异。根据这些调查结果,除其他外,建议对基本技术专家教师提供适当的培训和关于所有确定为困难的题目的进修课程。关键词:难点,基础技术,基础教育课程,教师感知,学生感知
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Determinants Affecting Entrepreneurial Intention Among Students at UC Makassar From Awareness To Action: Addressing The Underlying Factors Of The Glass Ceiling Effect For Women In Multiple Sectors DOMESTIC VISITORS’ TRAVEL INTENTION TO SABAH POST COVID-19 TRAVEL RESTRICTION Developing River Tourism Products and The Marketing Strategies: Observation and Focus Group Discussion Approach Exploring the Nexus between Healthcare Tourism Services and Tourists’ Behavioural Intentions in Penang: A Comprehensive Analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1