A prospective study of response and toxicity of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation versus only concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locoregionally advanced unresectable head-and-neck cancer

T. Das, P. Das
{"title":"A prospective study of response and toxicity of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation versus only concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locoregionally advanced unresectable head-and-neck cancer","authors":"T. Das, P. Das","doi":"10.5455/ijmsph.2020.12349201910012020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The first-line treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head-and-neck cancer is concurrent chemoradiation, which is the standard of care. Concurrent chemoradiation improved locoregional control but little impact on distance metastases. Induction chemotherapy (IC) can reduce local disease and distance metastases. Objectives: The purpose of our study is to compare the outcome of disease and toxicity between IC followed by concurrent chemo-radiation and only concurrent chemoradiation in patients of locally advanced unresectable head-and-neck cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 37 patients were included in IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy group. IC was administered with injection paclitaxel, injection carboplatin, and injection 5-fluorouracil for three cycles. Thirty-six patients were included in Arm B, concurrent chemoradiation group. The total dose of radiation was given in both the Arms 66 Gy in 33 fractions, five fractions per week for 6.3 weeks with concurrent chemotherapy injection cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly. Results: Grade 4 skin reaction was 2 (7%) in Arm A and 1 (3.3%) in Arm B. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was 1 (3.4%) in Arm A and no Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was seen in Arm B. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was 1 (3.4%) in Arm A and 2 (6.6%) in Arm B. Complete response of disease after 6 months of completion of treatment was 19 (65.5%) in Arm A and 18 (60%) in Arm B. Conclusion: Our study showed no significant difference in disease response regarding locoregional disease control between two groups but distance recurrence can be reduced with IC with manageable toxicity.","PeriodicalId":14153,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health","volume":"6 1","pages":"199-203"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2020.12349201910012020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The first-line treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head-and-neck cancer is concurrent chemoradiation, which is the standard of care. Concurrent chemoradiation improved locoregional control but little impact on distance metastases. Induction chemotherapy (IC) can reduce local disease and distance metastases. Objectives: The purpose of our study is to compare the outcome of disease and toxicity between IC followed by concurrent chemo-radiation and only concurrent chemoradiation in patients of locally advanced unresectable head-and-neck cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 37 patients were included in IC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy group. IC was administered with injection paclitaxel, injection carboplatin, and injection 5-fluorouracil for three cycles. Thirty-six patients were included in Arm B, concurrent chemoradiation group. The total dose of radiation was given in both the Arms 66 Gy in 33 fractions, five fractions per week for 6.3 weeks with concurrent chemotherapy injection cisplatin 40 mg/m2 weekly. Results: Grade 4 skin reaction was 2 (7%) in Arm A and 1 (3.3%) in Arm B. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was 1 (3.4%) in Arm A and no Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was seen in Arm B. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia was 1 (3.4%) in Arm A and 2 (6.6%) in Arm B. Complete response of disease after 6 months of completion of treatment was 19 (65.5%) in Arm A and 18 (60%) in Arm B. Conclusion: Our study showed no significant difference in disease response regarding locoregional disease control between two groups but distance recurrence can be reduced with IC with manageable toxicity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
局部晚期不可切除头颈癌患者诱导化疗后同步放化疗与仅同步放化疗的反应和毒性的前瞻性研究
背景:局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌的一线治疗是同步放化疗,这是标准的治疗方法。同步放化疗改善了局部控制,但对远处转移影响不大。诱导化疗(IC)可以减少局部疾病和远处转移。目的:本研究的目的是比较局部晚期不可切除头颈癌患者同步放化疗和单纯同步放化疗的疾病结局和毒性。材料与方法:将37例患者纳入同步放化疗组。IC与注射紫杉醇、注射卡铂和注射5-氟尿嘧啶一起给予3个周期。B组36例患者为同步放化疗组。两组总放射剂量66 Gy,分为33次,5次/周,共6.3周,同时化疗注射顺铂40 mg/m2 /周。结果:A组4级皮肤反应2例(7%),b组1例(3.3%)。A组3级发热性中性粒细胞减少1例(3.4%),b组未见3级发热性中性粒细胞减少1例(3.4%),b组无3级发热性中性粒细胞减少2例(6.6%)。3级血小板减少1例(3.4%),b组2例(6.6%)。我们的研究显示,两组之间在局部疾病控制方面的疾病反应没有显著差异,但IC可以减少距离复发,并且毒性可控。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitude, and preventive behavior toward COVID-19 of high school students in Bangkok, Thailand: A study among students in harrow's international school Knowledge, attitude, and drug resistance preventive behaviors of high school students in Bangkok Effect of neurodynamic techniques on radiating symptoms and mechanosensitivity of neural tissue in subjects with lumbosacral radiculopathy: A double-blind randomized controlled trial Correlation of homocysteine and Vitamin B12 level as a surrogative marker for early detection of sensorineural hearing loss in children Mutations in genes onset the disease of cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1