Syntactic Spelling – Merged and/or Separate Writing. Cognitive Thoughts

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Chuzhdoezikovo Obuchenie-Foreign Language Teaching Pub Date : 2022-04-25 DOI:10.53656/for22.204sint
M. Georgievа
{"title":"Syntactic Spelling – Merged and/or Separate Writing. Cognitive Thoughts","authors":"M. Georgievа","doi":"10.53656/for22.204sint","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The explanation of merged and / or separate writing of words and phrases can only be achieved as a principled research position when the third axis in the coordinate system of language – the human consciousness, is taken into account. The syntactic orthographic principle explicitly introduces the cognitive approach, as the syntax expresses the cognitive need. This is a extremely sufficient justification for taking out of the vocabulary those supposedly complex words, but in fact word combinations, whose spelling is entirely and only syntactically justified – only separate writing.","PeriodicalId":41031,"journal":{"name":"Chuzhdoezikovo Obuchenie-Foreign Language Teaching","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chuzhdoezikovo Obuchenie-Foreign Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53656/for22.204sint","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The explanation of merged and / or separate writing of words and phrases can only be achieved as a principled research position when the third axis in the coordinate system of language – the human consciousness, is taken into account. The syntactic orthographic principle explicitly introduces the cognitive approach, as the syntax expresses the cognitive need. This is a extremely sufficient justification for taking out of the vocabulary those supposedly complex words, but in fact word combinations, whose spelling is entirely and only syntactically justified – only separate writing.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语法拼写-合并和/或分开书写。认知的想法
只有考虑到语言坐标系中的第三个轴——人的意识,对词语和短语的合并和/或分离写作的解释才能成为一个原则性的研究立场。句法正字法原则明确地引入了认知方法,因为句法表达了认知需要。这是一个非常充分的理由,可以从词汇表中删除那些被认为是复杂的单词,但实际上是单词组合,其拼写完全且仅在语法上合理-只是单独的写作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The Role of Digital Tools in Teaching of Slovak Phonetics at Sofia University "St. Kliment Ohridski" Confused in Time (Some Observations on the Latest Bulgarian Novels) Foreign Language Education – Towards Language and Culture through Literature Reflections on working for the Council of Europe The Cycle of the Arts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1