Institutionalizing the United States Forest Service’s Shared Stewardship Strategy in the Western United States

Chad Kooistra, Courtney A. Schultz, J. Abrams, H. Huber-Stearns
{"title":"Institutionalizing the United States Forest Service’s Shared Stewardship Strategy in the Western United States","authors":"Chad Kooistra, Courtney A. Schultz, J. Abrams, H. Huber-Stearns","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvac010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The USDA Forest Service’s 2018 Shared Stewardship Strategy emphasizes partnerships with states, tribes, and other organizations or stakeholders to identify priority areas for forest management, coordinate across jurisdictions, and leverage capacities to expand forest restoration and wildfire mitigation. Through ninety-six interviews across nine western states with Forest Service and state agency staff and partners, we researched how the Shared Stewardship Strategy was being translated into practice. We found that, in most states, actors have relied on existing programs and partnerships to set the foundation for Shared Stewardship. Some states developed new positions or committees to support enhanced coordination, inclusive representation, and joint prioritization. Interviewees said that realizing shared accountability among partners and trying new approaches required training staff on existing mechanisms to work across jurisdictions and clear communication and support from leaders. Monitoring how efforts around the Shared Stewardship Strategy interact with other initiatives can inform future institutional changes to support multi-partner, landscape-level work.\n \n \n \n Federal and state agency staff and their partners supported increased state-level coordination to do more cross-boundary forest management in line with the Forest Service’s Shared Stewardship Strategy. They needed clear direction and support from agency and organizational leaders to share accountability and risks in trying new approaches. Existing and new coordinator positions and multi-partner advisory committees were essential for building partnerships and cross-jurisdictional work. Monitoring the social (e.g., trust among partners) and ecological (e.g., improved forest health) outcomes of partnerships and joint prioritization could indicate successful approaches and provide important context for future efforts across jurisdictions.\n","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvac010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The USDA Forest Service’s 2018 Shared Stewardship Strategy emphasizes partnerships with states, tribes, and other organizations or stakeholders to identify priority areas for forest management, coordinate across jurisdictions, and leverage capacities to expand forest restoration and wildfire mitigation. Through ninety-six interviews across nine western states with Forest Service and state agency staff and partners, we researched how the Shared Stewardship Strategy was being translated into practice. We found that, in most states, actors have relied on existing programs and partnerships to set the foundation for Shared Stewardship. Some states developed new positions or committees to support enhanced coordination, inclusive representation, and joint prioritization. Interviewees said that realizing shared accountability among partners and trying new approaches required training staff on existing mechanisms to work across jurisdictions and clear communication and support from leaders. Monitoring how efforts around the Shared Stewardship Strategy interact with other initiatives can inform future institutional changes to support multi-partner, landscape-level work. Federal and state agency staff and their partners supported increased state-level coordination to do more cross-boundary forest management in line with the Forest Service’s Shared Stewardship Strategy. They needed clear direction and support from agency and organizational leaders to share accountability and risks in trying new approaches. Existing and new coordinator positions and multi-partner advisory committees were essential for building partnerships and cross-jurisdictional work. Monitoring the social (e.g., trust among partners) and ecological (e.g., improved forest health) outcomes of partnerships and joint prioritization could indicate successful approaches and provide important context for future efforts across jurisdictions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国西部美国林务局共同管理战略的制度化
美国农业部林务局2018年共同管理战略强调与各州、部落和其他组织或利益相关者建立伙伴关系,以确定森林管理的优先领域,跨司法管辖区进行协调,并利用能力扩大森林恢复和野火缓解。通过对西部九个州的林务局和州机构工作人员和合作伙伴的96次采访,我们研究了“共享管理战略”是如何转化为实践的。我们发现,在大多数州,参与者都依靠现有的项目和伙伴关系来为共同管理奠定基础。一些州设立了新的职位或委员会,以支持加强协调、包容性代表权和共同优先事项。受访者表示,要实现合作伙伴之间的共同问责制并尝试新方法,需要对工作人员进行跨辖区工作的现有机制培训,并得到领导人的明确沟通和支持。监测围绕“共同管理战略”的努力如何与其他举措相互作用,可以为未来的制度变革提供信息,以支持多合作伙伴、景观层面的工作。联邦和州机构的工作人员及其合作伙伴支持加强州一级的协调,根据林务局的共同管理战略开展更多的跨界森林管理。他们需要机构和组织领导人的明确指导和支持,以便在尝试新办法时分担责任和风险。现有的和新的协调员职位以及多伙伴咨询委员会对于建立伙伴关系和跨管辖区工作至关重要。监测伙伴关系和共同确定优先次序的社会(例如,伙伴之间的信任)和生态(例如,改善森林健康)成果可以表明成功的做法,并为今后跨司法管辖区的努力提供重要背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi Kazdağı göknarı ormanlarında göknar ökseotu bulunma ve bulaşma durumu: Kökez Orman İşletme Şefliği örneği Hitit metinlerinde orman Almus yöresi doğal doğu kayını meşcerelerinin çap dağılımının Weibull dağılımı ile modellenmesi Türkiye’nin kuzeybatısındaki bir plantasyonda yerli ve egzotik çam türlerinin ibrelerinde görülen fungal endofitler Assessing Mid-rotation Loblolly Pine and Competing Vegetation Responses to Post-thin Fertilization and Herbicide Application in the Southeastern United States
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1