Economic Losses From a Fire in a Dense-Packed U.S. Spent Fuel Pool

IF 0.7 Q3 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Science & Global Security Pub Date : 2017-05-04 DOI:10.1080/08929882.2017.1318561
F. V. von Hippel, M. Schoeppner
{"title":"Economic Losses From a Fire in a Dense-Packed U.S. Spent Fuel Pool","authors":"F. V. von Hippel, M. Schoeppner","doi":"10.1080/08929882.2017.1318561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In 2013, the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimated the reduction of the off-site economic losses from a fire in a drained U.S. spent fuel pool if fuel that had cooled for more than five years were transferred to dry cask storage—an option it called “expedited transfer.” In this article, it is shown that the savings would be much higher than the NRC estimated. Savings increase to about $2 trillion if: losses beyond 50 miles are included; the land-contamination threshold for long-term population relocation is changed to that used for the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents and recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and, based on the experience of Japan, decontamination of land areas to levels acceptable for population return is assumed to take at least four years. If expedited transfer were implemented, the off-site economic losses would be reduced by about 98%.","PeriodicalId":55952,"journal":{"name":"Science & Global Security","volume":"29 1","pages":"80 - 92"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Global Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2017.1318561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

ABSTRACT In 2013, the staff of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission estimated the reduction of the off-site economic losses from a fire in a drained U.S. spent fuel pool if fuel that had cooled for more than five years were transferred to dry cask storage—an option it called “expedited transfer.” In this article, it is shown that the savings would be much higher than the NRC estimated. Savings increase to about $2 trillion if: losses beyond 50 miles are included; the land-contamination threshold for long-term population relocation is changed to that used for the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents and recommended by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; and, based on the experience of Japan, decontamination of land areas to levels acceptable for population return is assumed to take at least four years. If expedited transfer were implemented, the off-site economic losses would be reduced by about 98%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国密集乏燃料池发生火灾造成的经济损失
2013年,美国核管理委员会的工作人员估计,如果将冷却超过五年的乏燃料转移到干桶储存,可以减少美国乏燃料池发生火灾造成的场外经济损失,这种选择被称为“快速转移”。在这篇文章中,它表明,节省将远远高于NRC估计。如果包括50英里以外的损失,节省的费用将增加到约2万亿美元;长期人口迁移的土地污染阈值改为美国环境保护署建议的切尔诺贝利和福岛事故中使用的阈值;而且,根据日本的经验,假定至少需要四年的时间才能使陆地地区的污染达到人口返回可接受的水平。如果实行加急转运,可减少约98%的场外经济损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Global Security
Science & Global Security INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
14.30%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
Utilizing a Virtual Sodium-Cooled Fast Reactor Digital Twin to Aid in Diversion Pathway Analysis for International Safeguards Applications Editors’ Note Plutonium Production under Uranium Constraint Hypersonic Weapons: Vulnerability to Missile Defenses and Comparison to MaRVs Ceci N’est Pas Une Bombe: Lessons from a Field Experiment Using Neutron and Gamma Measurements to Confirm the Absence of Nuclear Weapons
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1