Change of routine coagulation parameters in plasma samples with different hematocrit values

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.2478/rrlm-2023-0014
I. Kucukcetin, Cahit Nacitarhan, S. Ozdem
{"title":"Change of routine coagulation parameters in plasma samples with different hematocrit values","authors":"I. Kucukcetin, Cahit Nacitarhan, S. Ozdem","doi":"10.2478/rrlm-2023-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Aim There are many preanalytical variables affecting routine coagulation tests. Increased hematocrit (Htc) levels are one of these variables. However, no study has been conducted to determine the effect of low Htc values on coagulation tests. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate whether low Htc values affect coagulation tests besides high Htc values. Methods Standard human plasma was injected into coagulation tubes containing 3.2% sodium citrate to reflect hematocrit rates of 5% to 75% and prothrombin time (PT), active partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT) and fibrinogen measurements were performed. Results Three groups were formed according to Htc levels: A (5-25%), B (30-50%) and C (55-75%). PT (s) were found 13.7±0.30 in group A, 14.88±0.57 s in group B, 20.16 ±4.66 s in group C respectively. aPTT (s) results were 35.79±1.39 s in group A, 42.48 ± 3.51 s in group B and 76.47 ± 31.55 in group C. TT (s) results were found to be 26.42 ± 0.77 s (group A), 28.24±1.17 s (group B) and 32.02±2.60 (group C). Fibrinogen levels (g/L) were measured as 2.30 ± 0,05, 2.21 ± 0,07 and 1.90 ± 0.20 in groups A, B, C, respectively. For all measured parameters, group A reflecting low Htc was significantly (P < 0 ,0001) different from the other groups. Conclusion Previous studies have reported that high Htc (> 55%) levels affected routine coagulation tests. In our study, low Htc (5-25%) values were also shown to cause errors in the test results.","PeriodicalId":49599,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","volume":"25 1","pages":"83 - 90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2023-0014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Aim There are many preanalytical variables affecting routine coagulation tests. Increased hematocrit (Htc) levels are one of these variables. However, no study has been conducted to determine the effect of low Htc values on coagulation tests. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate whether low Htc values affect coagulation tests besides high Htc values. Methods Standard human plasma was injected into coagulation tubes containing 3.2% sodium citrate to reflect hematocrit rates of 5% to 75% and prothrombin time (PT), active partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), thrombin time (TT) and fibrinogen measurements were performed. Results Three groups were formed according to Htc levels: A (5-25%), B (30-50%) and C (55-75%). PT (s) were found 13.7±0.30 in group A, 14.88±0.57 s in group B, 20.16 ±4.66 s in group C respectively. aPTT (s) results were 35.79±1.39 s in group A, 42.48 ± 3.51 s in group B and 76.47 ± 31.55 in group C. TT (s) results were found to be 26.42 ± 0.77 s (group A), 28.24±1.17 s (group B) and 32.02±2.60 (group C). Fibrinogen levels (g/L) were measured as 2.30 ± 0,05, 2.21 ± 0,07 and 1.90 ± 0.20 in groups A, B, C, respectively. For all measured parameters, group A reflecting low Htc was significantly (P < 0 ,0001) different from the other groups. Conclusion Previous studies have reported that high Htc (> 55%) levels affected routine coagulation tests. In our study, low Htc (5-25%) values were also shown to cause errors in the test results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同红细胞压积值血浆样品常规凝血参数的变化
目的影响凝血常规检查的分析前变量很多。红细胞压积(Htc)水平升高是这些变量之一。然而,目前还没有研究确定低Htc值对凝血试验的影响。因此,在本研究中,我们旨在评估除了高Htc值外,低Htc值是否会影响凝血试验。方法将标准人血浆注入含有3.2%柠檬酸钠的凝血管中,反映5% ~ 75%的红细胞压积率,测定凝血酶原时间(PT)、活性部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)、凝血酶时间(TT)和纤维蛋白原。结果按Htc水平分为A组(5 ~ 25%)、B组(30 ~ 50%)、C组(55 ~ 75%)。PT (s) A组为13.7±0.30 s, B组为14.88±0.57 s, C组为20.16±4.66 s。aPTT (s)结果A组为35.79±1.39 s, B组为42.48±3.51 s, C组为76.47±31.55 s。TT (s)结果分别为26.42±0.77 s (A组)、28.24±1.17 s (B组)和32.02±2.60 (C组),纤维蛋白原水平(g/L)分别为2.30±0.05、2.21±0.07和1.90±0.20。对于所有测量参数,反映低Htc的A组与其他组有显著差异(P < 0.0001)。结论既往研究报道高Htc(> 55%)水平影响常规凝血试验。在我们的研究中,低Htc(5-25%)值也会导致测试结果出现错误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
0.31
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to publish new information that would lead to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of production of human diseases, their prevention and diagnosis as early as possible and to monitor therapy and the development of the health of patients
期刊最新文献
Associations of levels of high-molecular-weight adiponectin, secreted frizzled-related protein 5 and vascular endothelial growth factor-165 with diabetic retinopathy The potential value of some adipokines and cytokines as diagnostic biomarkers for prostate cancer Correlations of special AT-rich sequence binding protein 2 and chitinase-3-like protein-1 with sensitivity to paclitaxel chemotherapy for gastric cancer Correlations of contrast-enhanced ultrasound parameters with free thyroxine, total thyroxine, thyroid peroxidase antibody and thyroglobulin antibody in patients with thyroid nodules Analyzing serum tryptophan metabolites in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1