The Worth of Ionized Calcium Levels Calculated by Zeisler, Butler and Hanna Methods in Diagnosis of Hypocalcemia

Tuba Batur, Halil İbrahim Akbay, E. Çokluk
{"title":"The Worth of Ionized Calcium Levels Calculated by Zeisler, Butler and Hanna Methods in Diagnosis of Hypocalcemia","authors":"Tuba Batur, Halil İbrahim Akbay, E. Çokluk","doi":"10.5505/vtd.2022.42744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: It was aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of the ionized calcium levels calculated by the Zeisler, Butler and Hanna method on the evaluation of hypocalcemia. Materials and Methods: Whole blood ionized calcium and serum total calcium levels of 500 individuals aged between 20-60 years were retrospectively screened. Individuals were divided into hypoalbuminemia and normoalbuminemia groups according to their serum albumin concentrations. In these groups, the diagnostic performance of total calcium and ionized calcium concentrations calculated by Zeisler,Butler and Hanna methods in terms of hypocalcemia were examined. While determining hypocalcemia, ionized calcium level was accepted as a reference.The difference and correlation between directly measured ionized calcium and calculated ionized calcium were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed ranks and Spearman correlation analysis. Results: The ionized calcium levels calculated by the Zeisler,Butler, Hanna methods were higher than the directly measured ionized calcium level. The method with the highest sensitivity and accuracy in terms of hypocalcemia was the Zeisler method.However, the specificity and negative predictive values were low.There was no correlation between directly measured ionized calcium and calculated ionized calcium levels in the hypoalbuminemia group. A significant correlation was observed between ionized calcium and calcium levels calculated by the Zeisler and Hanna methods in the normoalbuminemia group,but this correlation was low. No correlation was observed between ionized calcium and calcium calculated by Butler's method. Conclusion : The results of the study limit the use of the Zeisler,Butler and Hanna methods in estimating ionized calcium. We believe that it would not be reliable to comment on the level of ionized calcium with these methods.","PeriodicalId":23509,"journal":{"name":"Van Medical Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Van Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/vtd.2022.42744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: It was aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of the ionized calcium levels calculated by the Zeisler, Butler and Hanna method on the evaluation of hypocalcemia. Materials and Methods: Whole blood ionized calcium and serum total calcium levels of 500 individuals aged between 20-60 years were retrospectively screened. Individuals were divided into hypoalbuminemia and normoalbuminemia groups according to their serum albumin concentrations. In these groups, the diagnostic performance of total calcium and ionized calcium concentrations calculated by Zeisler,Butler and Hanna methods in terms of hypocalcemia were examined. While determining hypocalcemia, ionized calcium level was accepted as a reference.The difference and correlation between directly measured ionized calcium and calculated ionized calcium were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed ranks and Spearman correlation analysis. Results: The ionized calcium levels calculated by the Zeisler,Butler, Hanna methods were higher than the directly measured ionized calcium level. The method with the highest sensitivity and accuracy in terms of hypocalcemia was the Zeisler method.However, the specificity and negative predictive values were low.There was no correlation between directly measured ionized calcium and calculated ionized calcium levels in the hypoalbuminemia group. A significant correlation was observed between ionized calcium and calcium levels calculated by the Zeisler and Hanna methods in the normoalbuminemia group,but this correlation was low. No correlation was observed between ionized calcium and calcium calculated by Butler's method. Conclusion : The results of the study limit the use of the Zeisler,Butler and Hanna methods in estimating ionized calcium. We believe that it would not be reliable to comment on the level of ionized calcium with these methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Zeisler、Butler和Hanna法计算的钙离子水平在低钙血症诊断中的价值
前言:本研究旨在探讨Zeisler, Butler和Hanna法计算的离子钙水平对低钙血症的诊断价值。材料与方法:回顾性筛选500例20 ~ 60岁人群的全血离子钙和血清总钙水平。根据血清白蛋白浓度分为低白蛋白血症组和正常白蛋白血症组。在这些组中,检查了Zeisler,Butler和Hanna方法计算的总钙和电离钙浓度在低钙血症方面的诊断性能。在测定低钙血症时,离子钙水平可作为参考。采用Wilcoxon符号秩和Spearman相关分析,分析直接测得的离子钙与计算得到的离子钙的差异和相关性。结果:Zeisler、Butler、Hanna法计算的离子钙水平高于直接测量的离子钙水平。Zeisler法是测定低血钙的灵敏度和准确度最高的方法。然而,特异性和阴性预测值较低。在低白蛋白血症组中,直接测量的电离钙和计算的电离钙水平之间没有相关性。在正常白蛋白血症组中,观察到离子钙与Zeisler和Hanna方法计算的钙水平之间存在显著相关性,但这种相关性较低。电离钙与巴特勒方法计算的钙之间没有相关性。结论:本研究结果限制了Zeisler、Butler和Hanna方法在估计电离钙方面的应用。我们认为,用这些方法评价电离钙的水平是不可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α and C-Reactive Protein Levels in the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Neonatal Sepsis Epiretinal Membrane Surgery on Youtube Does Sinapic Acid Provide Neuroprotection Against Cisplatin-Induced Toxicity in HT-22 Cells The Invisible Face of the Iceberg: The Psychosocial Effect of the Covid-19 Pandemic Process in Children Evaluation of Mean Platelet Volüme, Platelet Distribution Width And Red Cell Distribution Width İn Bipolar Disorder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1