IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GALE-SHAPLEY ALGORITHM FOR AUTOMATING RECEPTION OF UNIVERSITY APPLICANTS

Konstantin E. Ryskin, Mokhannad Abdulsalam Yunus Al Askari, S. A. Fedosin
{"title":"IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GALE-SHAPLEY ALGORITHM FOR AUTOMATING RECEPTION OF UNIVERSITY APPLICANTS","authors":"Konstantin E. Ryskin, Mokhannad Abdulsalam Yunus Al Askari, S. A. Fedosin","doi":"10.15507/0236-2910.026.201604.462-474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article considers the realization of the algorithm enrollment of appli - cants to university on the basis of the Gale-Shapley algorithm with various parties initi -ating. The aim of this study is to analyze the performance and stability of the computer implementation of the algorithm. The qualitative and quantitative differences received on the same data sets are discussed. Results. The authors propose two options algorithm for admission entrant, which dif fer in side initiation of the “enrollee” or “university”. For the algorithm, with a side of initiation “enrollee”, allocation can be made on specialties in process entering data about entrants, thereby to maintain the latest information about placing, but it’s worth noting that if you delete or change data of entrants you must run the algorithm from the beginning using the already entered data about the applicants. And for the algorithm with the initiating party “university” is possible to prioritize enrollee in specialty in process filing their applications and run the algorithm if necessary. It is worth noting that the resulting placement will be more beneficial to initiating parties. Also discusses the characteristics of the average execution time when these values change: the num - ber of applicants, the quota in the specialty, the number of priorities in the entrant, the number of specialties. The authors point to the differences results of the algorithms with different parties initiating that is not only the qualitative difference of the results, but also quantitatively. The quantitative difference is due to “equality” of entrants a relatively some specialty. Discussion and Conclusions. Variants proposed by the authors can be used for automat - ing enrollment of university applicants. the the the a theoretical","PeriodicalId":53930,"journal":{"name":"Mordovia University Bulletin","volume":"358 1","pages":"462-474"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mordovia University Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/0236-2910.026.201604.462-474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article considers the realization of the algorithm enrollment of appli - cants to university on the basis of the Gale-Shapley algorithm with various parties initi -ating. The aim of this study is to analyze the performance and stability of the computer implementation of the algorithm. The qualitative and quantitative differences received on the same data sets are discussed. Results. The authors propose two options algorithm for admission entrant, which dif fer in side initiation of the “enrollee” or “university”. For the algorithm, with a side of initiation “enrollee”, allocation can be made on specialties in process entering data about entrants, thereby to maintain the latest information about placing, but it’s worth noting that if you delete or change data of entrants you must run the algorithm from the beginning using the already entered data about the applicants. And for the algorithm with the initiating party “university” is possible to prioritize enrollee in specialty in process filing their applications and run the algorithm if necessary. It is worth noting that the resulting placement will be more beneficial to initiating parties. Also discusses the characteristics of the average execution time when these values change: the num - ber of applicants, the quota in the specialty, the number of priorities in the entrant, the number of specialties. The authors point to the differences results of the algorithms with different parties initiating that is not only the qualitative difference of the results, but also quantitatively. The quantitative difference is due to “equality” of entrants a relatively some specialty. Discussion and Conclusions. Variants proposed by the authors can be used for automat - ing enrollment of university applicants. the the the a theoretical
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现自动接收大学申请者的gale-shapley算法
介绍。本文考虑在多方参与的情况下,以Gale-Shapley算法为基础实现大学招生算法。本研究的目的是分析该算法的计算机实现的性能和稳定性。讨论了在相同数据集上收到的定性和定量差异。结果。提出了两种不同于侧面发起“被录取者”和侧面发起“大学”的录取参与方选择算法。对于算法,有起始“enroll lee”的一面,可以对输入入选者数据的过程中的专业进行分配,从而保持最新的排位信息,但值得注意的是,如果您删除或更改了输入者数据,则必须使用已经输入的申请人数据从头运行算法。对于算法,发起方“大学”可以在提交申请的过程中优先考虑专业注册者,并在必要时运行算法。值得注意的是,最终的安置将更有利于发起方。还讨论了这些值变化时平均执行时间的特征:申请人数、专业配额、进入者优先级数量、专业数量。作者指出,不同发起方的算法结果的差异,不仅是结果的定性差异,而且是定量差异。数量上的差异是由于进入者在相对一些专业上的“平等”。讨论和结论。作者提出的变体可以用于大学申请者的自动招生。这个是理论上的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mordovia University Bulletin
Mordovia University Bulletin MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automated Unit for Magnetic-Pulse Processing of Plants in Horticulture The Resource of Movable Sealing Joints with the O-Ring Seal Modeling of Stress-Strain State in Connection Resource Defines of Volumetric Hydraulic Drive The Parametrization of the Cauchy Problem for Nonlinear Differential Equations with Contrast Structures The Installation for Processing of Parts with a Complex Profile of Working Surface
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1