Confirmation of Standards of Proof through Bayes Theorem

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.25162/arsp-2020-0026
Mirko Pečarič
{"title":"Confirmation of Standards of Proof through Bayes Theorem","authors":"Mirko Pečarič","doi":"10.25162/arsp-2020-0026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal reasoning on the requirements and application of law has been studied for centuries, but in this subject area the legal profession maintains predominantly the same stance it did in the time of the Ancient Greeks. There is a gap between the standards of proof, one which has been always demonstrated by percentages and in terms of the evaluation of these standards by percentages by mathematical or statistical methods. One method to fill the gap is Bayes theorem that describes an event’s probability based on conditions that might (or might not) be related to an event. Bayes theorem can help to establish or confirm a relation between facts and rules if there is sufficient other evidence (frequency of characteristics) that connect a party in a procedure with a considered legal action.","PeriodicalId":41477,"journal":{"name":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","volume":"28 1","pages":"532-553"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archiv fur Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/arsp-2020-0026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Legal reasoning on the requirements and application of law has been studied for centuries, but in this subject area the legal profession maintains predominantly the same stance it did in the time of the Ancient Greeks. There is a gap between the standards of proof, one which has been always demonstrated by percentages and in terms of the evaluation of these standards by percentages by mathematical or statistical methods. One method to fill the gap is Bayes theorem that describes an event’s probability based on conditions that might (or might not) be related to an event. Bayes theorem can help to establish or confirm a relation between facts and rules if there is sufficient other evidence (frequency of characteristics) that connect a party in a procedure with a considered legal action.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用贝叶斯定理确定证明标准
关于法律的要求和适用的法律推理已经研究了几个世纪,但在这个主题领域,法律职业主要保持着与古希腊时代相同的立场。证明标准之间存在差距,证明标准一向是用百分比来证明的,而证明标准是用数学或统计方法用百分比来评价这些标准的。填补这一空白的一种方法是贝叶斯定理,该定理基于可能(或可能不)与事件相关的条件来描述事件的概率。如果有足够的其他证据(特征的频率)将程序中的一方与考虑的法律行为联系起来,贝叶斯定理可以帮助建立或确认事实与规则之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Replacing the Persecution Condition for Refugeehood Hanfei: der politische Realismus in der chinesischen Philosophie Gewalt und Legitimation – Grundzüge eines unaufhebbaren Missverhältnisses Mit den Augen eines befangenen Chronisten Why Kelsen’s Basic Norm Does not Include a Transition from Is to Ought
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1